Six Sigma
Data-driven methodology for defect reduction and process improvement
EN 1090
EU standard for execution of steel and aluminium structures.
Quick Verdict
Six Sigma drives voluntary process excellence across industries via DMAIC, while EN 1090 mandates structural steel/aluminium compliance in EU construction for CE marking. Companies adopt Six Sigma for cost savings and quality; EN 1090 for legal market access and liability control.
Six Sigma
ISO 13053:2011 Quantitative methods in Six Sigma
Key Features
- Structured DMAIC cycle for existing process improvements
- Professional belt hierarchy with governance roles
- Statistical measurement validation via Gage R&R
- Tollgate reviews linking to strategic objectives
- Sustainment using SPC and control plans
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
- Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
- CE marking and Declaration of Performance
- Welding quality management via ISO 3834
- Material traceability and NDT inspection
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
Six Sigma Details
What It Is
Six Sigma is a de facto industry standard and methodology (ISO 13053:2011 provides formal guidance) for data-driven process improvement. It focuses on reducing variation, preventing defects, and achieving near-perfect quality through statistical methods, targeting 3.4 defects per million opportunities.
Key Components
- DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) and DMADV for core methodology
- Belt roles: Champions, Master Black Belts, Black/Green Belts
- Tools: Gage R&R, SPC, FMEA, DOE, control plans
- Governance via tollgates, charters, and project alignment
- Certification via ASQ, IASSC with project/exam requirements
Why Organizations Use It
Delivers financial savings (e.g., GE $1B+), risk reduction, customer satisfaction. Voluntary but strategic for competitiveness; integrates with Lean/ISO for compliance. Builds data culture, stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: sponsorship, training, project selection, DMAIC execution, sustainment. Applies enterprise-wide across industries; requires 12-18 months initially, ongoing audits/training.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is a harmonized European standard family for the execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components and kits. It implements the EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR), enabling CE marking through a risk-based approach via Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4).
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC) certification, Declaration of Performance (DoP).
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium execution (welding, tolerances, corrosion protection, inspection).
- Core principles: ISO 3834 welding quality, material traceability, NDT inspection.
- Notified Body certification under AVCP systems.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for EU market access with CE marking.
- Reduces liability, ensures safety in high-risk structures.
- Builds trust, enables tenders for bridges/stadia.
- Drives process maturity, cuts rework via disciplined FPC.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC design, welding quals, NB audits. Targets fabricators in EU/UK; 6-12 months typical. Requires ongoing surveillance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Six Sigma | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Process improvement methodology (DMAIC, variation reduction) | Execution and conformity of steel/aluminium structures |
| Industry | All industries worldwide (manufacturing, services, healthcare) | Construction (steel/aluminium) in EU/EEA markets |
| Nature | Voluntary de facto standard, certification optional | Mandatory harmonized standard for CE marking |
| Testing | Internal projects, statistical validation, belt certification | FPC certification, NB audits, ITT/ITC, surveillance |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, program failure or lost savings | Market exclusion, fines, certificate suspension |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Six Sigma and EN 1090
Six Sigma FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FISMA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare FISMA vs U.S. SEC cybersecurity rules: Key compliance diffs, risk mgmt, reporting for feds vs public cos. Boost resilience—read now! (140 chars)
SAFe vs SOC 2
SAFe vs SOC 2: Scale agile with SAFe's Lean-Agile compliance embedding SOC 2 controls via ARTs & Vanta. Boost velocity, security, ROI in regulated IT. Compare now!
SAFe vs IEC 62443
Discover SAFe vs IEC 62443: Scale agile enterprises with SAFe frameworks or secure OT systems via IEC standards. Compare agility, compliance benefits. Optimize now!