Standards Comparison

    Six Sigma

    Voluntary
    1986

    Data-driven methodology for variation reduction and defect prevention

    VS

    ISO 13485

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for medical device quality management systems

    Quick Verdict

    Six Sigma drives data-driven process improvement across industries via DMAIC for defect reduction, while ISO 13485 mandates a QMS for medical devices ensuring regulatory compliance and traceability. Companies adopt Six Sigma for efficiency gains; ISO 13485 for market access and safety.

    Process Improvement

    Six Sigma

    ISO 13053:2011 Six Sigma process improvement

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Structured DMAIC methodology for existing processes
    • Professional belt hierarchy and governance roles
    • Statistical measurement validation via Gage R&R
    • Tollgate reviews linking to strategic objectives
    • SPC control plans for sustained improvements
    Quality Management

    ISO 13485

    ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based controls for device lifecycle processes
    • Regulatory requirements integration into QMS
    • Strict documentation and record retention rules
    • Process validation and traceability mandates
    • Post-market surveillance and CAPA systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Six Sigma Details

    What It Is

    Six Sigma is a de facto industry framework for process improvement, anchored by ISO 13053:2011 defining quantitative methods. It focuses on reducing variation and defects to achieve near-perfect quality (3.4 DPMO benchmark), using data-driven, statistical approaches like DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) for existing processes and DMADV for new designs.

    Key Components

    • DMAIC/DMADV structured phases with mandatory deliverables (charters, SIPOC, FMEA, control plans)
    • **Belt hierarchyChampions, Master Black Belts, Black/Green Belts
    • Statistical tools: MSA (Gage R&R), hypothesis testing, DOE, SPC
    • Governance: tollgates, project selection tied to strategy Certification via bodies like ASQ (experience + projects required).

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives financial savings (e.g., GE $1B+), customer satisfaction, risk reduction. Voluntary but strategic for competitiveness; integrates with Lean/ISO 9001. Builds data culture, stakeholder trust via proven ROI.

    Implementation Overview

    Enterprise deployment: executive sponsorship, training, project portfolio. Applies to all sizes/industries (manufacturing to services). Phased rollout (readiness, pilots, scale); audits/sustainment ongoing. No universal certification but ASQ/IASSC benchmarks competence.

    ISO 13485 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 13485:2016 is an international standard specifying requirements for quality management systems (QMS) in medical devices, designed for regulatory purposes. It applies to organizations across the device lifecycle, from design to post-market activities, using a risk-based process approach to ensure consistent safety, performance, and compliance.

    Key Components

    • Organized into Clauses 4–8 covering QMS, management responsibility, resources, product realization, and measurement/improvement.
    • Emphasizes documented procedures, records, validation, traceability, and risk management (linked to ISO 14971).
    • Requires quality manual, medical device files, and controls for outsourcing, software validation.
    • Certification via accredited bodies through staged audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access (e.g., EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026).
    • Mitigates risks like recalls via robust CAPA, complaints handling.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, reduces costs through process efficiency.
    • Provides competitive edge in supply chains and partnerships.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
    • Suits all sizes in medical devices globally.
    • Involves cross-functional teams, eQMS tools; 9–18 months typical.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Six Sigma
    Process improvement methodology (DMAIC, variation reduction)
    ISO 13485
    QMS for medical device lifecycle (design to post-market)

    Industry

    Six Sigma
    All industries (manufacturing, healthcare, finance)
    ISO 13485
    Medical devices and related services only

    Nature

    Six Sigma
    Voluntary de facto standard, certification bodies vary
    ISO 13485
    Formal ISO certification standard for regulatory compliance

    Testing

    Six Sigma
    Tollgate reviews, statistical validation, no mandatory audits
    ISO 13485
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

    Penalties

    Six Sigma
    No legal penalties, project failure or certification loss
    ISO 13485
    Regulatory enforcement, market bans, fines for non-compliance

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Six Sigma and ISO 13485

    Six Sigma FAQ

    ISO 13485 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages