Six Sigma
Data-driven framework for defect reduction and variation control
ISO 31000
International guidelines for enterprise risk management.
Quick Verdict
Six Sigma drives process excellence through DMAIC and defect reduction for operational gains, while ISO 31000 provides risk management guidelines for strategic resilience. Companies adopt Six Sigma for cost savings and quality; ISO 31000 for informed decisions and uncertainty navigation.
Six Sigma
ISO 13053:2011 Six Sigma Methodology
Key Features
- Structured DMAIC methodology for existing processes
- Professional belt hierarchy and roles
- Data-driven statistical root cause analysis
- Tollgate governance linking to strategy
- SPC control plans for sustainment
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Eight core principles for effective risk management
- Integrated framework with leadership commitment
- Iterative six-step risk management process
- Customizable to any organization or context
- Non-certifiable guidelines emphasizing continual improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
Six Sigma Details
What It Is
Six Sigma is a de facto management framework (ISO 13053:2011 provides formal guidance) focused on reducing process variation and defects to achieve near-perfect quality levels (3.4 DPMO). It employs a data-driven, statistical approach via DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) for existing processes and DMADV for new designs.
Key Components
- DMAIC/DMADV methodologies with phase deliverables and tollgates.
- Belt hierarchy: Champions, Master Black Belts, Black/Green Belts.
- Tools: MSA, SPC, DOE, FMEA, control plans.
- Governance model tying projects to financial returns; certification via ASQ/IASSC.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives cost savings (e.g., GE $1B+), customer satisfaction, risk reduction. Voluntary but strategic for competitiveness, compliance integration (ISO 9001). Builds data culture, stakeholder trust via proven ROI.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: sponsorship, training, project portfolio, DMAIC execution, sustainment. Suits all sizes/industries; enterprise-scale needs 12-18 months. No mandatory certification; internal audits ensure maturity.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is a non-certifiable international standard providing principles-based guidance for systematic risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations of any size or sector manage uncertainty affecting objectives, using an integrated, iterative approach focused on creating and protecting value.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsEight principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), a framework (leadership, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement), and a six-step process (communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting).
- Built on PDCA cycle; no fixed controls, emphasizing flexibility.
- Guidelines only, not for certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances decision-making, resilience, and opportunity capture.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supports governance, reduces losses.
- Aligns with regulations/standards like ISO 27001; voluntary but strategic for competitiveness.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: leadership alignment, gap analysis, pilot, rollout, monitoring.
- Tailored to context; involves policy, training, tools (e.g., GRC platforms).
- Applicable universally; no audits required, internal assurance suffices. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | Six Sigma | ISO 31000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Process improvement, defect reduction via DMAIC | Enterprise risk management principles and process |
| Industry | All industries, manufacturing to services | All organizations, any sector globally |
| Nature | De facto methodology, certification optional | Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary framework |
| Testing | Statistical validation, MSA, capability analysis | Risk assessment, monitoring, internal reviews |
| Penalties | No formal penalties, project failure risks | No penalties, poor risk decisions consequences |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Six Sigma and ISO 31000
Six Sigma FAQ
ISO 31000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026
Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the
You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization
Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes
CMMC Level 2 Implementation Guide for Small DIB Contractors: First 5 Steps to C3PAO Certification with Infographic
Actionable CMMC Level 2 guide for small DIB contractors: 5-step roadmap to C3PAO certification with infographic on timelines, costs & POA&Ms. Achieve DoD compli
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 17025 vs ISO 26000
ISO 17025 vs ISO 26000: Lab competence for testing/calibration meets SR guidance. Key diffs, benefits for accreditation, ethics & sustainability. Compare now!
NIST CSF vs EPA
NIST CSF vs EPA: Compare NIST's flexible cybersecurity framework 2.0—featuring Govern function & supply chain focus—with EPA standards. Boost risk mgmt & compliance now!
OSHA vs ISO 37301
Compare OSHA vs ISO 37301: US enforcement meets global CMS standards. Discover risks, hierarchies, and integration for peak compliance. Boost safety now!