Standards Comparison

    Six Sigma

    Voluntary
    1986

    Data-driven framework for defect reduction and variation minimization

    VS

    WELL

    Voluntary
    2014

    Performance-based certification for occupant health in buildings.

    Quick Verdict

    Six Sigma drives process excellence through DMAIC and defect reduction across industries, while WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via air, light, and wellness features. Companies adopt Six Sigma for efficiency gains; WELL for talent retention and ESG credibility.

    Process Improvement

    Six Sigma

    ISO 13053:2011 Six Sigma process improvement

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • DMAIC structured methodology with tollgate reviews
    • Belt hierarchy of trained practitioners and champions
    • Data-driven statistical analysis and MSA validation
    • 3.4 DPMO benchmark tied to sigma levels
    • SPC control plans for improvement sustainment
    Building Health & Wellness

    WELL

    WELL Building Standard v2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 10 concept-based framework with preconditions and optimizations
    • Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
    • Certification tiers from Bronze to Platinum via points
    • Continuous monitoring pathways for compliance
    • Crosswalks with LEED for dual certification

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Six Sigma Details

    What It Is

    Six Sigma is a de facto management framework and methodology (ISO 13053:2011 provides formal guidance) focused on reducing process variation, preventing defects, and driving data-based improvements. It employs a disciplined DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) cycle or DMADV for new processes, emphasizing statistical rigor over assumptions.

    Key Components

    • DMAIC/DMADV phases with mandatory deliverables like charters, SIPOC, FMEA.
    • **Belt hierarchyChampions, Master Black Belts, Black/Green Belts.
    • Statistical tools: MSA (Gage R&R), hypothesis testing, DOE, SPC.
    • Governance via tollgates, control plans; no single certification but ASQ CSSBB benchmark.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Delivers financial savings (e.g., GE $1B+), quality gains, risk reduction. Voluntary but strategic for competitiveness, customer satisfaction, compliance integration (ISO 9001). Builds data culture, scales across industries.

    Implementation Overview

    Enterprise deployment: executive sponsorship, training, project portfolio, phased rollout (3-18 months per project). Applies to all sizes/industries; requires cultural change, no mandatory audits but internal sustainment.

    WELL Details

    What It Is

    The WELL Building Standard (WELL v2) is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being, emphasizing indoor environmental quality, nourishment, movement, and equity through evidence-based strategies.

    Key Components

    • **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
    • 24 Preconditions (mandatory pass/fail) and 102 Optimizations (point-earning).
    • Built on public health research; certification via Bronze (40 pts), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80) with concept minimums.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives productivity, retention, ESG reporting; higher rents and asset values.
    • Mitigates health risks; complements LEED for holistic sustainability.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via verified outcomes.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site verification, recertification every 3 years.
    • Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries; requires cross-functional teams and testing agents. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Six Sigma
    Process improvement, defect reduction, variation control
    WELL
    Building health, indoor environmental quality, occupant well-being

    Industry

    Six Sigma
    All industries worldwide, any size
    WELL
    Real estate, construction, facilities management globally

    Nature

    Six Sigma
    Voluntary methodology and certification
    WELL
    Voluntary performance-based certification

    Testing

    Six Sigma
    Internal tollgates, statistical validation, no mandatory external
    WELL
    Mandatory on-site performance verification, third-party testing

    Penalties

    Six Sigma
    No legal penalties, loss of certification or gains
    WELL
    No legal penalties, loss of certification status

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Six Sigma and WELL

    Six Sigma FAQ

    WELL FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages