SOC 2
AICPA framework evaluating service organization controls
23 NYCRR 500
New York regulation for financial services cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
SOC 2 offers voluntary trust assurance for service providers via AICPA audits, accelerating enterprise sales. 23 NYCRR 500 mandates prescriptive cybersecurity for NY financial entities with fines for noncompliance, enforced by NYDFS.
SOC 2
System and Organization Controls 2
Key Features
- Mandatory Security criterion with CC1-CC9 controls
- Type 2 reports test operating effectiveness over 3-12 months
- Flexible scoping of optional TSC (Availability, Privacy)
- Independent CPA attestation builds customer trust
- Supports automation for continuous evidence collection
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- Annual CISO/CEO dual-signature compliance certification
- 72-hour notification for material cybersecurity incidents
- Phishing-resistant MFA for high-risk access
- Comprehensive TPSP risk management and contracts
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOC 2 Details
What It Is
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is an AICPA-developed attestation framework assessing service organizations' controls over customer data. It uses Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—a principles-based, risk-focused approach emphasizing design and operating effectiveness.
Key Components
- Five TSC: Security (mandatory, CC1-CC9), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy.
- Typically 50-100+ controls mapped to criteria.
- Built on COSO principles; Type 1 (point-in-time design), Type 2 (effectiveness over 3-12 months).
- Independent CPA audit issues unqualified/qualified opinions.
Why Organizations Use It
- Accelerates enterprise sales, unlocks markets like SaaS/fintech.
- Voluntary but market-mandated; mitigates breach liability.
- Builds trust via evidence of resilient controls; ROI via faster deals.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-4 weeks), deployment (4-8 weeks), monitoring/audit (3-6 months).
- Targets SaaS/cloud providers; scalable for startups-enterprises.
- Annual Type 2 recertification by AICPA-accredited CPA.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a state-level mandate effective March 2017 with 2023 amendments. It establishes prescriptive, risk-based cybersecurity requirements for financial entities to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and system integrity. The approach emphasizes governance, evidence-based outcomes, and continuous monitoring.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO oversight, MFA, encryption, asset inventories, third-party management, penetration testing, and 72-hour incident reporting.
- Risk Assessment as foundational element; annual CISO/CEO certification with five-year record retention.
- Built on NIST-aligned methodologies; Class A companies face enhanced audits and controls.
- Compliance via annual April 15 filing, no third-party certification required.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for NY-licensed financial firms (banks, insurers, etc.) to avoid multimillion-dollar fines.
- Enhances resilience against threats, improves vendor oversight, builds stakeholder trust.
- Strategic benefits: reduced incident risk, competitive edge in financial services.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment (MFA, PAM), testing.
- Applies to Covered Entities in NY financial sector; scalable by size/complexity.
- Involves board governance, evidence repositories; DFS provides templates and guidance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOC 2 | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Confidentiality, etc. | Financial services cybersecurity program, governance, controls |
| Industry | Service organizations (SaaS, cloud) all industries | NYDFS-regulated financial entities only |
| Nature | Voluntary AICPA audit framework | Mandatory state regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | Type 1/2 audits by CPA, annual recertification | Annual pen testing, vulnerability assessments, risk assessments |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market exclusion | Fines, consent orders, license revocation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOC 2 and 23 NYCRR 500
SOC 2 FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience
Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST 800-171 vs EU AI Act
Compare NIST 800-171 vs EU AI Act: Decode US CUI safeguards & EU high-risk AI rules. Gain insights on controls, compliance gaps & strategies to thrive globally. Read now!
K-PIPA vs NIST 800-171
Discover K-PIPA vs NIST 800-171: Compare Korea's strict privacy law with US CUI cybersecurity standards. Unlock differences, compliance strategies, and global tips to protect data effectively.
APPI vs SAMA CSF
APPI vs SAMA CSF: Japan's privacy law meets Saudi financial cyber framework. Unpack differences, compliance strategies & pitfalls for global success. Master now!