SOC 2
AICPA framework for Trust Services Criteria controls
EMAS
EU voluntary scheme for environmental management and audit
Quick Verdict
SOC 2 provides audited data security controls for tech firms globally, while EMAS mandates verified environmental performance reporting for EU organizations. Tech adopts SOC 2 for client trust; EU firms choose EMAS for compliance and sustainability leadership.
SOC 2
System and Organization Controls 2
Key Features
- Mandatory Security criterion with four optional TSC
- Type 2 reports verify operating effectiveness over time
- Flexible scoping for service organization systems
- Independent AICPA CPA firm attestations
- Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001 and HIPAA
EMAS
Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS III)
Key Features
- Mandatory verified public environmental statement
- Independent verifier for legal compliance
- Core performance indicators for comparability
- Initial Environmental Review with life-cycle aspects
- Continuous improvement via PDCA cycle
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOC 2 Details
What It Is
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework by the AICPA for service organizations. It assesses controls under Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy—using a risk-based, principles-driven approach via Type 1 (design) or Type 2 (operating effectiveness) reports.
Key Components
- **Five TSCSecurity (mandatory, CC1-CC9), plus four optionals.
- 50-100 controls per scope, with redundancy (2-3 per category).
- Built on COSO; CPA-issued reports with unqualified opinions ideal.
- Annual Type 2 recertification model.
Why Organizations Use It
- Unlocks enterprise deals, shortens sales cycles 15-30%.
- Builds trust moat, reduces CAC via due diligence efficiency.
- Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience (99.99% uptime).
- Market-driven for SaaS/cloud; overlaps ISO 27001/HIPAA.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping/gaps (2-8 weeks), deploy/monitor (3-12 months), CPA audit.
- Automation (Vanta/Drata) cuts evidence work 70-80%.
- Targets tech services any size, US-centric; $20-100K cost.
EMAS Details
What It Is
EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) is a voluntary EU regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009) for organizations to evaluate, manage, report, and improve environmental performance. It applies to any EU/EEA organization or participating third country, using a PDCA-based EMS with mandatory verification and public transparency.
Key Components
- **PillarsInitial Environmental Review, EMS (aligned with ISO 14001), legal compliance checks, internal audits, management review, annual environmental statement.
- **Core elements6 mandatory performance indicators (energy, materials, water, waste, biodiversity, emissions).
- Built on Annex I-IV requirements; independent verifier validation and Competent Body registration.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives cost savings via resource efficiency (5-15% energy reductions).
- Ensures verified legal compliance, reducing fines and risks.
- Boosts procurement advantages, market access, and ESG reporting (CSRD alignment).
- Builds stakeholder trust through transparent, audited performance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Prepare (1-3 months), Deploy (6-12 months), Verify (3 months); total 12-18 months.
- Cross-functional teams, data systems, training; suitable for all sizes/sectors.
- Requires accredited verifier and annual updates.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOC 2 | EMAS |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Data security, availability, confidentiality, privacy | Environmental performance, legal compliance, reporting |
| Industry | Tech, SaaS, cloud, service organizations globally | All sectors, manufacturing, services in EU/EEA |
| Nature | Voluntary AICPA audit framework | Voluntary EU Regulation with binding obligations |
| Testing | CPA audits Type 1/2 annually | Independent verifier validation, annual statements |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market exclusion | Registration suspension/deletion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOC 2 and EMAS
SOC 2 FAQ
EMAS FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight
Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa
Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SAFe vs MAS TRM
Compare SAFe vs MAS TRM: Agile scaling powerhouse meets Singapore's tech risk guidelines. Boost enterprise agility, compliance & ROI in regulated IT—explore now!
WEEE vs WCAG
Discover WEEE vs WCAG: EU e-waste Directive (2012/19/EU) meets web accessibility gold standard. Compare scopes, compliance & strategies for circular economy success. Dive in!
SAFe vs AS9100
SAFe vs AS9100: Agile scaling powerhouse meets aerospace QMS rigor. Compare principles, configs, compliance & benefits for enterprise agility + safety. Optimize now!