What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to scale Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises to achieve Business Agility through alignment, collaboration, and value delivery among numerous teams.** SAFe integrates 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles, such as taking an economic view and organizing around value, with seven core competencies including Lean-Agile Leadership and Continuous Learning Culture. It structures delivery via Agile Release Trains (ARTs) of 50-125 people executing Program Increments (PIs) of 8-12 weeks, enabling faster time-to-market, improved quality, and employee engagement in software and IT operations.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility rather than a regulatory standard.** Professionally, large enterprises scaling Agile beyond single teams—particularly in software development, IT operations, and regulated sectors like finance or healthcare—adopt SAFe to coordinate hundreds of practitioners. Over 20,000 enterprises and 1 million certified professionals use its configurations from Essential SAFe (single ARTs) to Full SAFe (portfolio-level), driven by needs for PI alignment and value stream governance.

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification for implementation.** Success relies on internal practices like PI Planning, Inspect and Adapt workshops, and certifications such as SAFe Agilist, RTE, or SPC through Scaled Agile Academy training (2-4 days per module). Organizations self-assess maturity via roadmaps and metrics like velocity and flow, with tools like Jira Align supporting compliance in regulated environments through 'trust but verify' embedding.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed continuously via Inspect and Adapt workshops at the end of each 8-12 week Program Increment (PI).** PI Planning events (2-3 days) set objectives with confidence votes, while daily stand-ups, iteration reviews, and Program Board ROAM analysis enable ongoing impediment resolution. Maturity assessments occur pre-implementation and post-ART launch, with relentless improvement measured through metrics like ART flow and team velocity every PI.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**Non-compliance with SAFe carries no legal penalties, as it is not a mandated regulation, but results in enterprise risks like siloed teams, delayed value delivery, and failed agility transformations.** Common pitfalls include 30-70% failure rates from 'SAFe washing' (superficial adoption), dependency chaos, and resource gaps, leading to productivity losses, increased technical debt, and inability to achieve reported gains of 20-50% faster time-to-market or 30-75% productivity improvements.

An **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAFe can be mapped to other international frameworks through its flexible principles, roles, and configurations tailored to enterprise needs.** Its Lean-Agile foundation aligns with team-level practices like Scrum and Kanban, while ARTs and PIs integrate DevOps pipelines; tools like Atlassian Jira Align facilitate hybrid adaptations, enabling organizations to blend SAFe with existing methodologies for scaled execution without prescriptive conflicts.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is conducting a value stream assessment and training Lean-Agile Leaders via Leading SAFe (SAFe Agilist) certification.** Follow the Implementation Roadmap: identify value streams, form a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence (LACE), and launch with Essential SAFe for an initial ART, ensuring executive buy-in and RTE training to avoid pitfalls like over-customization.

What is the primary objective of **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM's primary objective is to establish sound technology risk governance and oversight while maintaining cyber resilience through defence-in-depth and continuous improvement of IT processes and controls to preserve confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of data and systems.** As per the January 2021 Guidelines (Preface 1.4), it promotes proportional practices for financial institutions (FIs) supervised by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), addressing rapid digitalisation and sophisticated cyber threats across governance, operations, and third-party risks.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM applies to all financial institutions (FIs) supervised by MAS, including banks, insurers, capital market intermediaries, payment service providers, and fintech entities.** Section 2.2 mandates proportional implementation commensurate with risk, complexity, and technologies used; while supervisory guidance rather than legislation, MAS considers observance of its spirit during inspections, with enforcement precedents like fines and license revocations for gaps.

Does **MAS TRM** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**MAS TRM requires an independent internal audit function to assess TRM controls, governance, and risk management effectiveness (Sections 3.1.7, 15), but does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** FIs must ensure board-approved independent assurance; external penetration testing or exercises are expected for high-risk systems (e.g., annual for Internet-facing, Section 13.2.4), with proportionality guiding scope.

How often should an assessment for **MAS TRM** be performed?

**TRM assessments must occur regularly, with frequency commensurate with system criticality and exposure, including annual penetration testing for Internet-accessible systems or post-major changes (Section 13.2.4).** Vulnerability assessments are ongoing (Section 13.1.1); DR plans reviewed annually (Section 8.2.2); policies and risk frameworks periodically updated for evolving threats (Sections 3.2.1, 4.1.5); cyber exercises and audits as risk dictates.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MAS TRM**?

**Non-compliance with MAS TRM exposes FIs to supervisory actions including fines, remediation orders, license conditions, revocations, and executive prohibitions.** MAS considers TRM observance in supervision (Section 2.2); precedents include S$27.45 million AML/CFT fines across nine FIs and CMS license revocation for governance failures, with personal liability for senior management via prohibition orders.

Can **MAS TRM** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MAS TRM can be mapped to frameworks like NIST CSF 2.0 and ISO 27001, as Section 3.2.1 encourages incorporating industry standards and best practices.** Its risk lifecycle (identification, assessment, treatment, monitoring; Section 4) aligns with NIST's Govern-Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover; controls like access management and resilience map to ISO Annex A, enabling hybrid implementations with exception processes (Section 3.2.2).

What is the first step to begin implementing **MAS TRM**?

**The first step is board approval of a technology risk appetite/tolerance statement and establishment of a TRM framework with defined roles, including appointing a CIO/CTO and CISO approved by the CEO (Sections 3.1.3, 3.1.7).** Develop an information asset inventory with classification and ownership (Section 3.3) to enable proportional controls.

SAFe vs MAS TRM

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Framework for scaling Lean-Agile in large enterprises

MAS TRM

Mandatory

2021

Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management.

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software delivery, enabling business agility. MAS TRM mandates technology risk controls for Singapore FIs, ensuring cyber resilience. Enterprises adopt SAFe for speed; FIs use TRM to avoid fines and outages.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework SAFe 6.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Agile Release Trains synchronize 50-125 people across teams
Program Increments enable 8-12 week predictable value delivery
10 immutable Lean-Agile principles guide economic decision-making
Seven core competencies drive enterprise Business Agility
Scalable configurations from Essential to Full SAFe

Technology Risk Management

MAS TRM

MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board and senior management accountability
Proportional risk-based implementation
Third-party risk management integration
Annual penetration testing for internet systems
Defense-in-depth cyber resilience controls

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 is a comprehensive knowledge base of organizational patterns for scaling Lean-Agile practices across enterprises. It integrates Agile, Lean, and systems thinking to achieve Business Agility in software, IT operations, and complex product delivery, applicable from single ARTs to portfolio-level governance.

Key Components

**Agile Release Trains (ARTs)50-125 people delivering value in Program Increments (PIs) of 8-12 weeks.
**10 Lean-Agile PrinciplesImmutable foundation like economic view and value flow.
**7 Core CompetenciesIncluding Lean-Agile Leadership, Team Agility, and Continuous Learning Culture.
**ConfigurationsEssential, Large Solution, Portfolio, Full—tailored scalability without certification but supported by Scaled Agile Academy training.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives faster time-to-market (20-50%), quality improvements (27-50%), and engagement via alignment and flow. Addresses scaling pains in regulated industries (GDPR, SOC 2) with embedded compliance. Builds stakeholder trust through predictable delivery and dual operating system balancing hierarchy with agility.

Implementation Overview

Follow **Implementation RoadmapValue stream mapping, leadership training (SAFe Agilist), phased ART launches with RTEs. Suited for large enterprises in software/IT; tools like Jira Align, Vanta aid integration. No formal certification required, but SPC coaching recommended for success.

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions (FIs). They provide a principles-based framework for governing and controlling technology and cyber risks, emphasizing proportional implementation based on risk profile, complexity, and criticality to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA).

Key Components

15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT operations, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber defense, assessments, and audit.
Synthesized into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset management, third-party oversight, and layered defenses.
No fixed control count; focuses on outcomes via defense-in-depth and continuous improvement.
Compliance via supervisory review, not formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Regulatory expectation for MAS-supervised FIs to demonstrate observance.
Mitigates cyber threats, outages, and third-party risks amid digitalization.
Builds resilience, customer trust, and operational stability.
Enables secure innovation and avoids enforcement (fines, sanctions).

Implementation Overview

Risk-based rollout: asset inventory, governance setup, control mapping, testing.
Applies to all MAS FIs; scalable by size/complexity.
Involves board approval, training, audits; 12-24 months typical.

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	MAS TRM
Scope	Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT	Technology/cyber risk in financial services
Industry	Software, IT operations worldwide	Singapore financial institutions only
Nature	Voluntary framework, no enforcement	Supervisory guidelines with enforcement
Testing	PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops	Annual pen testing, vulnerability assessments
Penalties	None, implementation failure risks	Fines, license revocation, prohibitions

Scope

SAFe

Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT

MAS TRM

Technology/cyber risk in financial services

Industry

SAFe

Software, IT operations worldwide

MAS TRM

Singapore financial institutions only

Nature

SAFe

Voluntary framework, no enforcement

MAS TRM

Supervisory guidelines with enforcement

Testing

SAFe

PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops

MAS TRM

Annual pen testing, vulnerability assessments

Penalties

SAFe

None, implementation failure risks

MAS TRM

Fines, license revocation, prohibitions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SAFe and MAS TRM

SAFe FAQ

MAS TRM FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook

Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 50001 vs 23 NYCRR 500

Compare ISO 50001 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Energy mgmt mastery meets NYDFS cyber rules. Key diffs, synergies for compliance, efficiency & resilience. Optimize now!

FERPA vs ISO 17025

Compare FERPA vs ISO 17025: FERPA protects student privacy in education records; ISO 17025 ensures lab testing competence. Key differences, compliance guide. Discover now!

PIPL vs 23 NYCRR 500

Compare PIPL vs 23 NYCRR 500: China's strict privacy law meets NYDFS cybersecurity rules. Master compliance strategies, cross-border risks, and implementation frameworks for global success. Dive in now!

SAFe

MAS TRM

Quick Verdict

SAFe

Key Features

MAS TRM

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SAFe Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SAFe FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAFe?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAFe?

Does SAFe require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAFe be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAFe?

An SAFe be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAFe?

MAS TRM FAQ

What is the primary objective of MAS TRM?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with MAS TRM?

Does MAS TRM require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for MAS TRM be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with MAS TRM?

Can MAS TRM be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing MAS TRM?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 50001 vs 23 NYCRR 500

FERPA vs ISO 17025

PIPL vs 23 NYCRR 500