What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent attestation that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with Security (CC1-CC9) mandatory. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, delivering assurance to stakeholders via CPA audits.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations like SaaS, cloud, and data processors face professional mandates from enterprise clients.** Targeted at providers storing, processing, or transmitting customer data, it is demanded in RFPs, MSAs, and vendor risk assessments by Fortune 500 firms, especially for deals over $5K ACV.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 verifies control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, including evidence like logs, pen tests, and access reviews. No formal certification exists—reports provide the assurance.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually, covering a 3-12 month monitoring period, with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months.** This captures full control cycles like quarterly access reviews and annual pen tests. Post-audit, continuous monitoring sustains compliance until the next fieldwork.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles by 3-6 months, and heightened breach liability under SLAs or laws like CCPA.** No AICPA fines apply, but operational impacts include 20-50% higher CAC, reputational damage, and investor scrutiny, with breaches costing $1M+ per incident.

Can **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 controls map extensively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80%+ overlap on 114 controls), NIST CSF, GDPR (99 articles), and HIPAA.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A, enabling multi-compliance efficiency—e.g., CC6 access controls support GDPR data protection—reducing redundant audits via AICPA spreadsheets.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria, selecting Security (mandatory) plus relevant optionals.** Inventory assets, data flows, and vendors; engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K). Output: Prioritized remediation of 50-100 controls using tools like Vanta.

What is the primary objective of **FedRAMP**?

**FedRAMP standardizes the security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring of cloud service offerings (CSOs) used by U.S. federal agencies.** Its "assess once, use many times" model leverages **NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5** controls across **Low** (~156 controls), **Moderate** (~323 controls), and **High** (~410 controls) baselines, determined by **FIPS 199** impact levels, reducing agency duplication.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FedRAMP**?

**FedRAMP is mandatory for cloud service providers (CSPs) handling federal data, with agencies required to use authorized CSOs unless exceptions apply.** OMB policy mandates it for external cloud services under FISMA, targeting CSPs seeking federal contracts via the **FedRAMP Marketplace** (484 Authorized, 73 In Process as of recent data).

Does **FedRAMP** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, FedRAMP mandates independent assessments by accredited Third-Party Assessment Organizations (3PAOs).** **A2LA-accredited** 3PAOs produce the **Security Assessment Report (SAR)** and **Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M)** using **NIST SP 800-53A** procedures, ensuring objectivity separate from consulting roles.

How often should an assessment for **FedRAMP** be performed?

**FedRAMP requires continuous monitoring with monthly deliverables and annual 3PAO reassessments.** CSPs submit vulnerability scans, **POA&M** updates, and incident reports quarterly/annually per the **Rev 5 Continuous Monitoring Playbook**, sustaining **Authority to Operate (ATO)** status.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FedRAMP**?

**Non-compliance risks ATO revocation, Marketplace delisting, and contract loss.** Failure in **continuous monitoring** or unresolved **POA&M** items leads to agency risk withdrawal, potential legal exposure under FISMA, and exclusion from federal procurement.

Can **FedRAMP** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**FedRAMP baselines derive directly from NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, enabling mappings to aligned frameworks.** Control overlays support reuse with NIST CSF and similar U.S. standards, though international mappings require tailoring for cloud-specific parameters.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FedRAMP**?

**Conduct FIPS 199 categorization to select the impact baseline (Low, Moderate, High, or LI-SaaS).** Develop the **System Security Plan (SSP)** using PMO templates, followed by readiness assessment with a 3PAO.

SOC 2 vs FedRAMP

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for Trust Services Criteria compliance

FedRAMP

Mandatory

2011

U.S. framework standardizing federal cloud security authorization

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 offers voluntary Trust Services Criteria audits for SaaS providers seeking enterprise trust, while FedRAMP mandates NIST-based authorizations for cloud services handling federal data. Companies adopt SOC 2 for market access; FedRAMP unlocks government contracts.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Type 2 reports verify operating effectiveness over 3-12 months
Mandatory Security criterion with four optional TSC
Flexible scoping tailored to service offerings
Independent CPA attestation builds enterprise trust
80% control overlap with ISO 27001 HIPAA

Cloud Security

FedRAMP

Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 baselines at Low/Moderate/High impact levels
Third-party 3PAO independent security assessments
Continuous monitoring with monthly/quarterly deliverables
Assess once, use many times reusability across agencies
FedRAMP Marketplace for authorized CSP visibility

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary framework by the AICPA for auditing service organizations' commitments to Trust Services Criteria (TSC). It assures security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy of customer data via risk-based controls over systems handling sensitive information.

Key Components

Five TSC: Security (mandatory, CC1-CC9 Common Criteria), Availability (A1), Confidentiality (C1), Processing Integrity (PI1), Privacy (P1)
50-100 controls per scope, with redundancy (2-3 per point)
Built on COSO principles
Type 1 (design) or Type 2 (operating effectiveness) CPA reports

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates sales, shortens due diligence by 80-90%
Market-driven for SaaS/cloud; unlocks enterprise deals
Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience
Builds trust moat, 15-30% close rate boost
Overlaps ISO 27001 (80%), HIPAA for efficiency

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-4w), deployment (4-8w), monitoring (3-12m), audit (1-2m)
Targets service orgs (SaaS, fintech); scalable startups-enterprises
Annual Type 2 recertification, automation (Vanta) for evidence

FedRAMP Details

What It Is

FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework that standardizes security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud-service offerings (CSOs) used by federal agencies. Its core purpose is the "assess once, use many times" model, leveraging risk-based NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls aligned to FIPS 199 impact levels.

Key Components

**BaselinesLow (~156 controls), Moderate (~323), High (~410), plus Low-Tailored/LI-SaaS (~70+).
Core artifacts: System Security Plan (SSP), Security Assessment Report (SAR), POA&M, continuous monitoring plans.
3PAO independent assessments; built on NIST standards.
Agency/Program Authorizations for compliance.

Why Organizations Use It

Unlocks federal contracts ($20M+ potential) and CMMC requirements.
Mandatory for federal cloud procurement; reduces agency duplication.
Enhances risk management, competitive differentiation, commercial trust.
Signals mature cloud security posture.

Implementation Overview

Phased: Sponsor/Preparation, 3PAO Assessment, Authorization, Continuous Monitoring.
Involves gap analysis, documentation, remediation; 12-18 months typical.
Applies to CSPs targeting U.S. federal/state markets.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	FedRAMP
Scope	Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, others	NIST 800-53 controls for federal cloud services
Industry	SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally	Cloud providers serving U.S. federal agencies
Nature	Voluntary AICPA audit standard	Mandatory U.S. government authorization program
Testing	Type 2 audits by CPA over 3-12 months	3PAO assessments plus continuous monitoring
Penalties	Lost business, no legal fines	Revocation, contract ineligibility

Scope

SOC 2

Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, others

FedRAMP

NIST 800-53 controls for federal cloud services

Industry

SOC 2

SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally

FedRAMP

Cloud providers serving U.S. federal agencies

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit standard

FedRAMP

Mandatory U.S. government authorization program

Testing

SOC 2

Type 2 audits by CPA over 3-12 months

FedRAMP

3PAO assessments plus continuous monitoring

Penalties

SOC 2

Lost business, no legal fines

FedRAMP

Revocation, contract ineligibility

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and FedRAMP

SOC 2 FAQ

FedRAMP FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)

Master TISAX 'Very High' tabletop exercises for ADAS suppliers with 2024 breach simulations like CAD leaks and ransomware. Get scripts, AAR templates, hybrid ti

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PMBOK vs ISO 27017

Compare PMBOK vs ISO 27017: PMBOK's governance & tailoring powers ISO 27017 cloud security controls. Align projects for compliance, risk reduction & value delivery—explore now!

Six Sigma vs ISO 27018

Six Sigma vs ISO 27018: DMAIC-driven defect reduction meets cloud PII privacy controls. Compare belts, governance & 3.4 DPMO vs consent, transparency & GDPR alignment. Optimize ops now!

OSHA vs CCPA

Compare OSHA safety standards vs CCPA privacy laws: Key differences, compliance tips, penalties & strategies. Safeguard your workplace & data—expert guide inside!

SOC 2

FedRAMP

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

FedRAMP

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

FedRAMP Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

Can SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

FedRAMP FAQ

What is the primary objective of FedRAMP?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FedRAMP?

Does FedRAMP require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FedRAMP be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FedRAMP?

Can FedRAMP be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FedRAMP?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PMBOK vs ISO 27017

Six Sigma vs ISO 27018

OSHA vs CCPA