SOC 2
AICPA framework for service organizations' Trust Services Criteria
GRI
Global standards for sustainability impact reporting
Quick Verdict
SOC 2 provides audited security controls for service organizations handling data, while GRI enables impact materiality reporting on sustainability for all firms. Companies adopt SOC 2 for enterprise trust and sales acceleration; GRI for stakeholder accountability and regulatory alignment.
SOC 2
System and Organization Controls 2
Key Features
- Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security focus
- Type 2 reports prove operating effectiveness over time
- Flexible scoping of optional criteria like Privacy
- AICPA CPA-attested independent assurance reports
- Risk-based controls for service organization data handling
GRI
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards
Key Features
- Modular Universal, Sector, Topic Standards structure
- Impact-based materiality assessment process
- Mandatory GRI Content Index for verifiability
- Broad worker scope including contractors (GRI 403)
- Supply chain due diligence requirements (GRI 308)
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOC 2 Details
What It Is
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA for evaluating service organizations' controls. It focuses on Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—Security (mandatory), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy—using a risk-based, control-oriented approach to assure data handling security.
Key Components
- Five TSC domains, with Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) under Security as foundation.
- 50-100+ controls mapped to TSC, often with redundancy (2-3 per point).
- Built on AICPA principles; Type 1 (design at point-in-time) vs. Type 2 (design + operating effectiveness over 3-12 months).
- CPA-led audits yield attested reports.
Why Organizations Use It
- Accelerates enterprise sales, unlocks markets like SaaS/cloud.
- Builds stakeholder trust, reduces due diligence friction.
- Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience.
- Voluntary but market-mandated; ROI via higher ACVs, efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-8 weeks), deployment/monitoring (3-6 months), audit.
- Targets SaaS/fintech service orgs; scalable via tools like Vanta.
- Annual Type 2 recertification with continuous monitoring.
GRI Details
What It Is
GRI Standards (Global Reporting Initiative Standards) are a modular framework for sustainability reporting. They provide a global common language for disclosing significant economic, environmental, and social impacts. The impact-centric approach requires identifying material topics based on actual and potential effects on stakeholders, using a structured materiality process.
Key Components
- Universal Standards (GRI 1 Foundation, GRI 2 General Disclosures, GRI 3 Material Topics): baseline requirements.
- **Sector Standardssector-specific material topics (e.g., Oil & Gas, Mining).
- **Topic Standardsspecific disclosures (e.g., GRI 403 Occupational Health & Safety, GRI 308 Supplier Environmental Assessment). Built on principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability; includes mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability. Voluntary compliance model with omissions allowed if justified.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives accountability, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU CSRD), risk management, and benchmarking. Enhances stakeholder trust, investor appeal via interoperability (SASB, ISSB), and operational improvements in HES.
Implementation Overview
Phased: materiality assessment, data systems, disclosures, assurance. Applies to all sizes/industries globally; no certification but third-party assurance recommended. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOC 2 | GRI |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, processing integrity | Economic, environmental, social impacts via Universal/Topic/Sector Standards |
| Industry | Service orgs (SaaS, cloud, fintech); global | All sectors; high-impact industries prioritized; global |
| Nature | Voluntary AICPA audit framework | Voluntary sustainability reporting standards |
| Testing | Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPA firms | Self-reported with materiality process; optional assurance |
| Penalties | No legal penalties; lost business/trust | No legal penalties; reputational/regulatory risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOC 2 and GRI
SOC 2 FAQ
GRI FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe
Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37301 vs ISO 19600
ISO 37301 vs ISO 19600: Certifiable CMS requirements replace guidance-only standard. Discover leadership, risk-based planning, whistleblowing & integration benefits. Upgrade now!
PIPL vs WEEE
Compare PIPL vs WEEE: Decode China's strict data privacy law against EU e-waste rules. Master compliance strategies, risks, and global implementation for tech firms. Dive in now!
ISO 27001 vs AS9100
Discover ISO 27001 vs AS9100: Compare info security (ISO 27001) with aerospace quality (AS9100). Boost compliance, risk mgmt & excellence—find your fit today!