Standards Comparison

    SOC 2

    Voluntary
    2010

    AICPA framework for service organizations' Trust Services Criteria

    VS

    GRI

    Voluntary
    2021

    Global standards for sustainability impact reporting

    Quick Verdict

    SOC 2 provides audited security controls for service organizations handling data, while GRI enables impact materiality reporting on sustainability for all firms. Companies adopt SOC 2 for enterprise trust and sales acceleration; GRI for stakeholder accountability and regulatory alignment.

    Cybersecurity / Trust

    SOC 2

    System and Organization Controls 2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security focus
    • Type 2 reports prove operating effectiveness over time
    • Flexible scoping of optional criteria like Privacy
    • AICPA CPA-attested independent assurance reports
    • Risk-based controls for service organization data handling
    Sustainability Reporting

    GRI

    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Modular Universal, Sector, Topic Standards structure
    • Impact-based materiality assessment process
    • Mandatory GRI Content Index for verifiability
    • Broad worker scope including contractors (GRI 403)
    • Supply chain due diligence requirements (GRI 308)

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SOC 2 Details

    What It Is

    SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA for evaluating service organizations' controls. It focuses on Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—Security (mandatory), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy—using a risk-based, control-oriented approach to assure data handling security.

    Key Components

    • Five TSC domains, with Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) under Security as foundation.
    • 50-100+ controls mapped to TSC, often with redundancy (2-3 per point).
    • Built on AICPA principles; Type 1 (design at point-in-time) vs. Type 2 (design + operating effectiveness over 3-12 months).
    • CPA-led audits yield attested reports.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Accelerates enterprise sales, unlocks markets like SaaS/cloud.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, reduces due diligence friction.
    • Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience.
    • Voluntary but market-mandated; ROI via higher ACVs, efficiency.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-8 weeks), deployment/monitoring (3-6 months), audit.
    • Targets SaaS/fintech service orgs; scalable via tools like Vanta.
    • Annual Type 2 recertification with continuous monitoring.

    GRI Details

    What It Is

    GRI Standards (Global Reporting Initiative Standards) are a modular framework for sustainability reporting. They provide a global common language for disclosing significant economic, environmental, and social impacts. The impact-centric approach requires identifying material topics based on actual and potential effects on stakeholders, using a structured materiality process.

    Key Components

    • Universal Standards (GRI 1 Foundation, GRI 2 General Disclosures, GRI 3 Material Topics): baseline requirements.
    • **Sector Standardssector-specific material topics (e.g., Oil & Gas, Mining).
    • **Topic Standardsspecific disclosures (e.g., GRI 403 Occupational Health & Safety, GRI 308 Supplier Environmental Assessment). Built on principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability; includes mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability. Voluntary compliance model with omissions allowed if justified.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives accountability, regulatory alignment (e.g., EU CSRD), risk management, and benchmarking. Enhances stakeholder trust, investor appeal via interoperability (SASB, ISSB), and operational improvements in HES.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: materiality assessment, data systems, disclosures, assurance. Applies to all sizes/industries globally; no certification but third-party assurance recommended. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    SOC 2
    Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, processing integrity
    GRI
    Economic, environmental, social impacts via Universal/Topic/Sector Standards

    Industry

    SOC 2
    Service orgs (SaaS, cloud, fintech); global
    GRI
    All sectors; high-impact industries prioritized; global

    Nature

    SOC 2
    Voluntary AICPA audit framework
    GRI
    Voluntary sustainability reporting standards

    Testing

    SOC 2
    Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPA firms
    GRI
    Self-reported with materiality process; optional assurance

    Penalties

    SOC 2
    No legal penalties; lost business/trust
    GRI
    No legal penalties; reputational/regulatory risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SOC 2 and GRI

    SOC 2 FAQ

    GRI FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages