What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with Security (CC1-CC9) mandatory. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, enabling SaaS providers and cloud firms to demonstrate robust risk mitigation to stakeholders.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework driven by market demands from enterprise clients.** It professionally targets service organizations like SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, fintech, and HR tech firms that store, process, or transmit customer data. Enterprises mandate Type 2 reports in RFPs and MSAs for vendor risk assessments, disqualifying non-compliant vendors and stalling 70-80% of deals.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 verifies control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over 3-12 months via sampling, walkthroughs, and evidence review (e.g., logs, pen tests). No formal certification exists—reports provide the assurance.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture a full control cycle and maintain stakeholder trust.** The monitoring period is typically 3-12 months (minimum 3), with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months between audits. Annual recertification via CPA fieldwork ensures ongoing evidence of controls like access reviews and vulnerability scans.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with SOC 2 results in lost enterprise deals, extended sales cycles, and heightened breach liability, though no direct AICPA fines apply.** Clients reject vendors without Type 2 reports, inflating CAC by 20-50% and blocking RFPs. In breaches, absent controls amplify damages under SLAs or laws like CCPA, with reputational harm delaying funding.

An **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 controls map extensively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A controls, enabling reuse for multi-compliance. This reduces duplication for global SaaS firms pursuing GDPR or HIPAA paths without full dual audits.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria, starting with mandatory Security (CC1-CC9).** Define in-scope systems, data flows, and optional TSC (e.g., Availability), then engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K). Inventory assets and map ~50-100 controls using tools like Vanta.

What is the primary objective of **ISA 95**?

**ISA 95's primary objective is to define a technology-agnostic reference architecture for integrating enterprise business systems at **Level 4** (business planning and logistics, e.g., ERP) with manufacturing operations management at **Level 3** (MES/MOM, SCADA).** It organizes activities into the Purdue model hierarchy (**Levels 0-4**), standardizes object models for equipment, materials, personnel, and production, and specifies information exchanges via its eight parts to reduce integration risk, cost, and errors between manufacturing control and enterprise functions.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISA 95**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with ISA 95, as it is a voluntary international standard (ANSI/ISA-95, IEC 62264).** Professionally, manufacturing executives, IT/OT architects, system integrators, and MES/ERP vendors in discrete, batch, or continuous industries adopt it to standardize enterprise-control interfaces, ensure semantic consistency, and support scalable integrations across multi-site operations.

Does **ISA 95** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISA 95 does not require external audits or third-party product certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through internal architectural alignment with its models (e.g., equipment hierarchy, activity models in Parts 1-4) and consistent information exchanges (Parts 5-8); an optional ISA-95/IEC 62264 certificate program exists for individual training, not system validation.

How often should an assessment for **ISA 95** be performed?

**ISA 95 assessments should be performed during initial implementation, major system changes, and annually as part of governance reviews.** Align with equipment hierarchy updates, integration expansions, or standard revisions (e.g., Part 1-2025), ensuring canonical models, alias mappings (Part 7), and Level 3-4 interfaces remain consistent amid evolving technologies like MQTT or OPC UA.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISA 95**?

**Non-compliance with ISA 95 incurs no formal penalties, as it lacks regulatory enforcement.** Consequences include increased integration costs, data inconsistencies, error-prone ERP-MES exchanges, prolonged project timelines, and operational risks like poor OEE tracking or traceability gaps in regulated manufacturing environments.

An **ISA 95** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISA 95's Purdue levels and models map directly to Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture (PERA).** Its hierarchical structure (Levels 0-4), activity models (Part 3), and object attributes (Parts 2/4) align with cybersecurity segmentation in Purdue extensions, enabling boundary definitions for secure conduits between enterprise and control domains.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISA 95**?

**The first step is to map existing systems and processes to ISA 95's Levels 0-4 hierarchy and conduct a gap analysis against Parts 1-3 models.** Establish cross-functional governance, inventory equipment/assets, and define priority Level 3-4 exchanges (e.g., production schedules) to build a canonical data model before transactions (Part 5) or messaging (Part 6).

SOC 2 vs ISA 95

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organization security controls

ISA 95

Voluntary

2000

International standard for enterprise-manufacturing system integration.

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 provides audited trust in data security for SaaS providers, while ISA 95 models enterprise-manufacturing integration for factories. Companies adopt SOC 2 to win enterprise clients; ISA 95 to streamline IT/OT data flows and reduce integration costs.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Type 2 audits operating effectiveness over 3-12 months
Mandatory Security TSC plus optional Availability, Confidentiality, others
Tailored scoping for service organizations' data handling
AICPA-accredited CPA independent assurance reports
High overlap with ISO 27001 and GDPR frameworks

Enterprise-Control Integration

ISA 95

ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Purdue levels 0-4 hierarchical model for boundaries
Activity models for manufacturing operations management
Object models for equipment, materials, personnel
Standardized transactions between Levels 3-4
Alias services for identifier mapping

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA for service organizations handling customer data. It evaluates controls using Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—security (mandatory), availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Employs a risk-based, control-focused approach with Type 1 (point-in-time design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) reports.

Key Components

Five TSC led by Security (CC1-CC9); optional criteria added per services.
Typically 50-100 controls covering access, monitoring, incident response.
Built on COSO principles with points-of-focus.
Requires independent CPA audit attestation; annual Type 2 renewal.

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates sales by streamlining vendor due diligence (80-90% questionnaires answered).
Mitigates breach risks, enhances resilience; market-driven for SaaS/cloud.
Builds stakeholder trust, unlocks enterprise deals ($5K+ ACV).
Competitive moat with overlaps to ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-4 weeks), control deployment (4-8 weeks), monitoring/audit (3-6 months).
Targets SaaS, fintech, cloud providers; scalable via automation (Vanta, Drata).
CPA-led audits essential; suits startups to enterprises.

ISA 95 Details

What It Is

ISA-95 (ANSI/ISA-95, IEC 62264) is an international framework for integrating enterprise business systems like ERP with manufacturing operations management (MES/MOM) and control systems. Its primary purpose is to standardize information exchange across the Purdue levels (0-4), focusing on the Level 3-4 interface. It uses hierarchical models, activity models, and object models for semantic consistency.

Key Components

Eight parts covering models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging (Part 6), aliases (Part 7), and profiles (Part 8).
Core Purdue hierarchy and equipment models.
No formal certification; compliance via alignment and training programs.

Why Organizations Use It

Reduces integration risks, costs, errors; enables data governance.
Supports Industry 4.0, cybersecurity segmentation.
Improves OEE, traceability; builds stakeholder collaboration.

Implementation Overview

Phased: assessment, modeling, pilot, rollout.
Applies to manufacturing industries globally; requires governance, canonical models.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	ISA 95
Scope	Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, privacy for data handling	Enterprise-control integration models for manufacturing operations and business systems
Industry	SaaS, cloud, tech service providers worldwide	Manufacturing (discrete, process, batch) globally
Nature	Voluntary AICPA audit framework	Voluntary ISA reference architecture standard
Testing	Type 1/2 CPA audits, annual Type 2 over 3-12 months	No formal certification; self-assessed model alignment
Penalties	No legal penalties; lost business/deals	No penalties; integration risks/costs

Scope

SOC 2

Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, confidentiality, privacy for data handling

ISA 95

Enterprise-control integration models for manufacturing operations and business systems

Industry

SOC 2

SaaS, cloud, tech service providers worldwide

ISA 95

Manufacturing (discrete, process, batch) globally

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit framework

ISA 95

Voluntary ISA reference architecture standard

Testing

SOC 2

Type 1/2 CPA audits, annual Type 2 over 3-12 months

ISA 95

No formal certification; self-assessed model alignment

Penalties

SOC 2

No legal penalties; lost business/deals

ISA 95

No penalties; integration risks/costs

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and ISA 95

SOC 2 FAQ

ISA 95 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

SAFe vs AS9100

SAFe vs AS9100: Agile scaling powerhouse meets aerospace QMS rigor. Compare principles, configs, compliance & benefits for enterprise agility + safety. Optimize now!

APPI vs ISO 37001

Compare APPI vs ISO 37001: Japan's data privacy law vs global anti-bribery standard. Unlock compliance frameworks, risks & phased implementation for ethical ops. (152)

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs 23 NYCRR 500

Discover MLPS 2.0 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Compare China's graded cyber regime with NYDFS financial rules. Key insights on compliance, governance & global risk mgmt. Align strategies today!

SOC 2

ISA 95

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

ISA 95

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISA 95 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

An SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

ISA 95 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISA 95?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISA 95?

Does ISA 95 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISA 95 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISA 95?

An ISA 95 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISA 95?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

SAFe vs AS9100

APPI vs ISO 37001

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs 23 NYCRR 500