What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with **Security (CC1-CC9)** mandatory. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, delivering evidence via penetration testing and vulnerability assessments for SaaS, cloud, and tech service organizations.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations are professionally mandated by enterprise clients.** It targets SaaS, cloud, fintech, and data processors storing or transmitting customer data, especially those pursuing deals with ACVs over $5,000. Enterprises embed SOC 2 Type 2 in RFPs and MSAs, disqualifying non-compliant vendors during vendor risk management.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm, resulting in an attestation report rather than certification.** Type 1 audits design at a point-in-time; Type 2 verifies operating effectiveness over a period via sampling, tests, and evidence like logs and access reviews. Reports include auditor opinion, management assertion, system description, and control test results.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually, covering a 3-12 month monitoring period with bridged continuity via management-issued bridge letters for gaps up to 3 months.** Post-audit, sustainment includes quarterly access reviews, monthly scans, and annual penetration tests, enabling recertification with 9 prior + 3 new months of evidence.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles by 3-6 months, and 20-50% higher CAC, with heightened breach liability exceeding $1M per incident.** Absent Type 2 reports, vendors face exhaustive questionnaires, custom indemnity, or abandonment in 70-80% of enterprise SaaS deals, plus reputational damage and delayed funding.

Can **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps effectively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% control overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets aligning CC1-CC9 to shared controls.** Security criteria reuse reduces duplication; for example, CC6 access controls align with ISO Annex A, enabling unified evidence for multi-framework compliance without dual audits.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and readiness assessment by engaging a CPA auditor to map existing controls against TSC.** Define in-scope systems, data flows, and criteria (Security mandatory), inventory assets, and produce a gap report prioritizing 50-100 controls like IAM and encryption.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27701**?

**ISO 27701 specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) to manage privacy risks associated with PII processing.** It extends ISO 27001 management system clauses (4–10) with privacy-specific controls in Annexes A (PII controllers) and B (PII processors), enabling demonstrable accountability through records like RoPA, DSAR procedures, and risk treatment plans.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27701**?

**ISO 27701 applies to any organization acting as a PII controller, PII processor, or both, regardless of size or sector.** Controllers determine processing purposes and must implement Annex A controls (e.g., lawful basis, transparency, data subject rights); processors follow controller instructions via Annex B controls (e.g., confidentiality, subprocessor management). It supports compliance with privacy laws like GDPR but is not legally mandatory itself.

Does **ISO 27701** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27701 certification is obtained through accredited third-party certification bodies via a two-stage audit process.** Stage 1 reviews documentation (e.g., scope, SoA, RoPA); Stage 2 verifies implementation via interviews and evidence sampling. Certification is valid for three years with annual surveillance audits and recertification at year three; it may integrate with ISO 27001 audits.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27701** be performed?

**ISO 27701 requires continual performance evaluation, including internal audits and management reviews at planned intervals.** Certification maintenance demands annual surveillance audits by certification bodies, plus ongoing monitoring, risk assessments, and internal audits to support PDCA improvement. Recertification occurs every three years.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27701**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27701 results in certification denial, suspension, or withdrawal by the certification body.** It undermines evidence of privacy governance, exposing organizations to regulatory fines under laws like GDPR (up to 4% of global turnover), contractual penalties, reputational damage, and supply-chain exclusion, as it fails to demonstrate PIMS effectiveness.

Can **ISO 27701** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27701 includes annexes for mapping to other frameworks.** Annex D maps to GDPR articles; Annex C to ISO/IEC 29100; Annex E to ISO/IEC 27018 and 29151; Annex F details relationships with ISO 27001 and 27002. These enable control crosswalks for integrated compliance without replacing legal obligations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27701**?

**The first step is defining PIMS context and scope per Clause 4, identifying PII processing activities, controller/processor roles, and interested parties.** Conduct a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 and Annexes A/B, using Annex F for existing ISO 27001 alignment, to produce an initial SoA and risk assessment.

SOC 2 vs ISO 27701

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organization security controls

ISO 27701

Voluntary

2019

International standard for privacy information management systems

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 provides flexible TSC-based security assurance for service organizations, while ISO 27701 establishes a structured PIMS for privacy governance. Companies adopt SOC 2 for enterprise trust and sales acceleration; ISO 27701 for global PII accountability and regulatory alignment.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
Type 2 reports prove operating effectiveness over time
Flexible scoping for service organizations' data controls
AICPA CPA attestation for independent assurance
Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001 and HIPAA

Privacy Management

ISO 27701

ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy Information Management System

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Establishes auditable Privacy Information Management System
Role-specific controls for PII controllers and processors
Integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS and PDCA cycle
Privacy risk assessments including data subject impacts
GDPR mappings and certifiable compliance evidence

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA to evaluate service organizations' controls over customer data. It uses Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—a risk-based, principles-focused approach emphasizing Security (mandatory) plus optional Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.

Key Components

Five TSC pillars, with Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) under Security covering control environment, risk assessment, access, monitoring, and vendors.
~50-100 controls mapped to TSC, requiring redundancy (2-3 per point).
Built on COSO principles; Type 1 (design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) reports issued by CPA auditors.

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates enterprise sales, shortens due diligence by 80-90%.
Mitigates breach risks, builds stakeholder trust for SaaS/cloud providers.
Voluntary but market-driven; overlaps with ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR for efficiency.
Competitive moat unlocking higher ACV deals, investor confidence.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping/gap analysis (4-8 weeks), deployment/monitoring (3-6 months), CPA audit.
Targets SaaS/fintech/HR tech; scalable via automation (Vanta, Drata).
Annual Type 2 recertification with bridge letters for continuity. (178 words)

ISO 27701 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is the international standard defining requirements for a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It guides organizations in managing privacy risks for processing personally identifiable information (PII) as controllers or processors. Employing a risk-based PDCA cycle, it aligns with ISO/IEC 27001 while enabling standalone implementation.

Key Components

Clauses 4–10: Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
**Annex AControls for PII controllers (e.g., consent, DSARs, retention).
**Annex BControls for PII processors (e.g., contracts, sub-processors).
Mappings to GDPR (Annex D), ISO 27001/27002. Certification via accredited bodies' two-stage audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates accountability for GDPR/POPIA/LGPD compliance.
Integrates privacy into security governance.
Reduces breach risks, fines; boosts procurement trust.
Enhances reputation, competitive differentiation.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scope/gap analysis, risk assessment, controls rollout, internal audits. Applies to all PII-processing organizations globally. Optional certification with 3-year validity, annual surveillance.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	ISO 27701
Scope	Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy via TSC	Privacy management system (PIMS) for PII controllers/processors
Industry	SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally	Any PII-processing sectors worldwide
Nature	Voluntary AICPA attestation framework	Voluntary ISO certification standard
Testing	Type 1/2 CPA audits over 3-12 months	Stage 1/2 certification audits, 3-year cycle with surveillance
Penalties	No legal penalties, market exclusion	No legal penalties, certification loss

Scope

SOC 2

Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy via TSC

ISO 27701

Privacy management system (PIMS) for PII controllers/processors

Industry

SOC 2

SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally

ISO 27701

Any PII-processing sectors worldwide

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA attestation framework

ISO 27701

Voluntary ISO certification standard

Testing

SOC 2

Type 1/2 CPA audits over 3-12 months

ISO 27701

Stage 1/2 certification audits, 3-year cycle with surveillance

Penalties

SOC 2

No legal penalties, market exclusion

ISO 27701

No legal penalties, certification loss

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and ISO 27701

SOC 2 FAQ

ISO 27701 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 50001 vs ISO 17025

Discover ISO 50001 vs ISO 17025: Energy mgmt for continual performance gains & cost savings vs lab competence for valid, impartial results. Align standards to your goals now!

C-TPAT vs ISO 56002

Discover C-TPAT vs ISO 56002: C-TPAT secures supply chains via trusted trader benefits; ISO 56002 builds innovation systems. Compare for compliance, security & growth edge.

COBIT vs GDPR UK

Compare COBIT vs GDPR UK: Align IT governance with UK GDPR using COBIT 2019's tailored framework for compliance, risk mgmt & strategy. Expert guide inside!

SOC 2

ISO 27701

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

ISO 27701

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27701 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

Can SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

ISO 27701 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27701?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27701?

Does ISO 27701 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27701 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27701?

Can ISO 27701 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27701?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 50001 vs ISO 17025

C-TPAT vs ISO 56002

COBIT vs GDPR UK