Standards Comparison

    SOC 2

    Voluntary
    2010

    AICPA framework for service organizations' trust controls

    VS

    ISO 30301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for records management systems

    Quick Verdict

    SOC 2 provides trust services attestation for service organizations' data security and operations, while ISO 30301 establishes certifiable records management systems for any entity. Companies adopt SOC 2 for enterprise sales enablement; ISO 30301 for governance, compliance, and evidentiary assurance.

    Cybersecurity / Trust

    SOC 2

    System and Organization Controls 2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
    • Type 2 audits operating effectiveness over time
    • Flexible scoping of optional criteria
    • Independent AICPA CPA firm attestation
    • Designed for service organizations data controls
    Records Management

    ISO 30301

    ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure for MSS integration
    • Normative Annex A operational controls
    • Explicit records requirements analysis (4.1.2)
    • Top management accountability and policy
    • Flexible conformity pathways options

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SOC 2 Details

    What It Is

    SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework by the AICPA evaluating service organizations' controls against **Trust Services Criteria (TSC)Security (mandatory, CC1-CC9), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. It employs a risk-based, principles-driven approach for systems handling customer data, especially in SaaS and cloud.

    Key Components

    • Five TSC with Security's common criteria foundational
    • 50-100 controls per scope, redundant for resilience
    • Built on COSO-integrated points of focus
    • Type 1 (point-in-time design) or Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) CPA reports

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Market-driven for enterprise deals, accelerates sales 15-30%
    • Voluntary yet essential for vendor risk management
    • Reduces breach liability, improves uptime to 99.99%
    • Competitive moat, overlaps 80% with ISO 27001/GDPR
    • Builds stakeholder trust via independent assurance

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis (2-4 weeks), remediation/monitoring (3-6 months), CPA audit
    • Suits startups to enterprises in tech/fintech
    • Automation (Vanta/Drata) cuts evidence work 70%
    • Annual Type 2 recertification with bridged periods

    ISO 30301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is a certifiable international standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It applies to any organization, using a High-Level Structure (HLS) for governance via Clauses 4–10, combined with records-specific operational controls in Clause 8 and Annex A (normative). The risk-based, PDCA approach ensures reliable evidence of business activities.

    Key Components

    • HLS clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • ~Operational controls in Annex A for lifecycle (creation to disposition).
    • Core principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability from ISO 15489.
    • Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances compliance, auditability, transparency; mitigates records risks (loss, alteration).
    • Improves efficiency, decision-making; supports business continuity.
    • Builds stakeholder trust; integrates with ISO 9001, 27001.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policy design, operational rollout, audits.
    • Scalable for any size/sector; 9–18 months typical; certification optional.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    SOC 2
    Security, availability, confidentiality, integrity, privacy via TSC
    ISO 30301
    Records management lifecycle, governance, operational controls

    Industry

    SOC 2
    SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally
    ISO 30301
    Any organization, all sectors, global applicability

    Nature

    SOC 2
    Voluntary AICPA attestation, Type 1/2 reports
    ISO 30301
    Voluntary ISO certification standard, management system

    Testing

    SOC 2
    CPA audits, Type 2 over 3-12 months operating effectiveness
    ISO 30301
    Internal audits, management review, certification body audits

    Penalties

    SOC 2
    No legal penalties, market exclusion, lost deals
    ISO 30301
    No legal penalties, certification loss, compliance risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SOC 2 and ISO 30301

    SOC 2 FAQ

    ISO 30301 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages