TOGAF
Vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework and methodology
HITRUST CSF
Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides enterprise architecture methodology for aligning business and IT globally, while HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable security controls for regulated industries like healthcare. Companies adopt TOGAF for strategic alignment and HITRUST for compliance assurance and market trust.
TOGAF
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative ADM lifecycle across Preliminary to Change Management phases
- Enterprise Continuum for classifying and reusing architecture assets
- Content Framework with metamodel, deliverables, artifacts, building blocks
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance, skills, maturity
- Reference models including TRM, SIB, III-RM for interoperability
HITRUST CSF
HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF)
Key Features
- Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into single control library
- Risk-based tailoring with organizational factors
- Five-level maturity scoring model
- Centralized HITRUST certification assurance
- MyCSF platform for scoping and evidence
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework developed by The Open Group. It provides a proven methodology for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change across business and IT. The primary approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), which supports tailoring to organizational context.
Key Components
- **ADM10-phase iterative lifecycle from Preliminary to Architecture Change Management, with ongoing Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts, building blocks, and Content Metamodel for core entities like actors, services, data.
- **Enterprise ContinuumClassifies reusable assets from generic reference models to organization-specific solutions.
- **Reference ModelsTRM, SIB, III-RM for standards and boundaryless information flow.
- **Architecture Capability FrameworkGovernance (Architecture Board), compliance, skills, maturity models. No formal certification required, but Open Group offers practitioner credentials.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives business-IT alignment, reduces duplication via reuse, improves ROI, avoids vendor lock-in, enhances governance and risk management. Strategic benefits include faster transformations, cost control, agility in regulated industries like finance, government.
Implementation Overview
Phased, iterative ADM application with tailoring; starts with maturity assessment, pilots high-value areas. Suited for large enterprises; requires repository, training, executive sponsorship. Voluntary adoption with ongoing change management.
HITRUST CSF Details
What It Is
HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing requirements from 60+ sources like HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It focuses on security and privacy for regulated sectors, using risk-based tailoring and a maturity scoring model to ensure operational effectiveness.
Key Components
- 19 assessment domains (e.g., Access Control, Risk Management, Incident Management)
- Hierarchical: 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications
- **Five-level maturityPolicy (15%), Procedure (20%), Implemented (40%), Measured (10%), Managed (15%)
- Tiered assurance: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year) via MyCSF platform
Why Organizations Use It
- Unified compliance: "assess once, report many"
- Credible third-party assurance reduces questionnaires/audits
- Improves risk management, breach reduction (99.4% breach-free)
- Market differentiation, insurance benefits in healthcare/finance
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment, monitoring
- For healthcare, finance; scalable by size/risk
- MyCSF tooling, external assessors required for certification; 6-18 months typical
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | HITRUST CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture design, planning, governance | Security/privacy controls, compliance assurance |
| Industry | All industries, global enterprise applicability | Healthcare primary, regulated sectors, expanding |
| Nature | Voluntary EA methodology/framework | Certifiable control framework with assurance |
| Testing | Internal governance reviews, maturity assessments | External assessor validation, centralized certification |
| Penalties | No formal penalties, loss of governance benefits | No legal penalties, certification revocation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and HITRUST CSF
TOGAF FAQ
HITRUST CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations
Unlock SOC excellence with our 5-step maturity roadmap. Compare SOC-CMM, NIST CSF, and CMMC frameworks to scale from ad-hoc to automated operations. Start your
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
Six Sigma vs CAA
Explore Six Sigma vs CAA: Data-driven defect reduction meets Clean Air Act compliance. Compare methodologies, benefits, and strategies for process excellence and regulatory mastery. Dive in now!
PIPL vs EMAS
Discover PIPL vs EMAS: China's rigorous data privacy law meets EU's premier environmental scheme. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & global insights. Master now!
SOC 2 vs GRI
Discover SOC 2 vs GRI: SOC 2 secures data via Trust Services Criteria; GRI reports ESG impacts. Compare frameworks, benefits & implementation for compliance wins.