SOC 2
AICPA framework for service organizations' security controls
ISO 56002
International guidance standard for innovation management systems
Quick Verdict
SOC 2 provides security controls assurance for service organizations via CPA audits, while ISO 56002 offers innovation management guidance. Enterprises adopt SOC 2 for trust and sales acceleration; all firms use ISO 56002 to systematize value-creating innovation.
SOC 2
System and Organization Controls 2
Key Features
- Five Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
- Type 2 audits operating effectiveness over 3-12 months
- Flexible scoping tailored to service organization risks
- Independent CPA attestation reports for vendor trust
- High overlap with ISO 27001 and NIST frameworks
ISO 56002
ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system guidance
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for IMS continual improvement
- Leadership commitment and governance requirements
- Portfolio management with stage-gates
- Balanced KPIs for performance evaluation
- Tailorable to all organization sizes
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOC 2 Details
What It Is
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework developed by the AICPA. It assesses service organizations' controls relevant to Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy—using a risk-based approach. Offers Type 1 (point-in-time design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) reports.
Key Components
- Five TSC: Security (mandatory, CC1-CC9 Common Criteria), plus optional Availability (A1), Confidentiality (C1), Processing Integrity (PI1), Privacy (P1)
- 50-100 controls per scope, with redundancy (2-3 per point)
- Built on COSO principles and 2017/2022/2023 TSC updates
- CPA-issued reports with auditor opinion and test results
Why Organizations Use It
- Market-driven for enterprise RFPs and sales acceleration (15-30% close rate boost)
- Voluntary but customer-mandated; reduces VRM friction
- Mitigates breach liabilities and operational risks
- Builds trust moat, investor appeal, and partnerships
- Overlaps 80% with ISO 27001, NIST for multi-framework efficiency
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-4 weeks), control deployment (4-8 weeks), monitoring (3-6 months), CPA audit
- Targets SaaS/cloud/fintech service providers, scalable from startups (10-50 employees) to enterprises
- Leverages automation (Vanta, Drata) for evidence; annual recertification
ISO 56002 Details
What It Is
ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). It provides a generic, non-prescriptive framework applicable to all organization sizes and sectors, focusing on transforming innovation into a strategic capability for value realization. Structured around the PDCA cycle and aligned with ISO's High-Level Structure.
Key Components
- Core clauses (4-10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement
- Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leaders, strategic direction, culture, uncertainty management
- No fixed controls; emphasizes tailoring and systems thinking
- Part of ISO 56000 family; pairs with ISO 56001 for certification
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns innovation with strategy for better ROI and resilience
- Enhances governance, reduces project failures, manages risks
- Builds competitive advantage and stakeholder trust
- Voluntary adoption for best practices, no legal mandate
Implementation Overview
- Phased: readiness assessment, pilot, scale-up (12-18 months typical)
- Key activities: diagnostics (e.g., PII), policy development, tooling, KPIs, audits
- Fits SMEs to enterprises globally; optional conformity assessments
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOC 2 | ISO 56002 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy controls | Innovation management system, PDCA framework |
| Industry | SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally | All sectors, sizes, innovation-focused organizations |
| Nature | Voluntary AICPA audit attestation | Voluntary ISO guidance standard |
| Testing | Type 2 audits over 3-12 months by CPAs | Internal audits, management reviews, no certification |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, lost business opportunities | No penalties, missed innovation opportunities |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOC 2 and ISO 56002
SOC 2 FAQ
ISO 56002 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the
Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GDPR vs SAMA CSF
Compare GDPR vs SAMA CSF: EU privacy gold standard meets Saudi financial cyber framework. Key differences, compliance strategies & global insights for secure data ops now.
PDPA vs CIS Controls
Compare PDPA vs CIS Controls: Decode Singapore/Thailand privacy laws & CIS cybersecurity safeguards. Align compliance, fortify data protection. Expert insights await!
ISO 26000 vs ISO 19600
Discover ISO 26000 vs ISO 19600: Non-certifiable SR guidance with 7 principles & core subjects vs risk-based compliance systems. Unlock strategic differences for governance excellence now!