Standards Comparison

    SOX

    Mandatory
    2002

    U.S. law mandating internal controls over financial reporting

    VS

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for aerospace quality management systems

    Quick Verdict

    SOX mandates financial controls and CEO/CFO certifications for US public firms to ensure reporting integrity, while AS9100 certifies aerospace suppliers' quality systems for product safety and traceability. Companies adopt SOX for legal compliance; AS9100 for market access.

    Financial Reporting

    SOX

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates ICFR assessment and auditor attestation (Section 404)
    • Establishes PCAOB for audit firm oversight and standards
    • Requires CEO/CFO personal certifications (Sections 302/906)
    • Enforces strict auditor independence rules (Title II)
    • Imposes criminal penalties for document tampering (Section 802)
    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100D: Quality Management Systems for ASD Organizations

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Configuration management for product integrity
    • Product safety processes across lifecycle
    • Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
    • Operational risk management in Clause 8
    • Enhanced supplier controls and traceability

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SOX Details

    What It Is

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute regulating corporate governance and financial disclosures for public companies. Its primary purpose is protecting investors through accurate financial reporting via internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR). SOX employs a risk-based, top-down approach aligned with frameworks like COSO.

    Key Components

    • 11 Titles covering PCAOB creation (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), certifications (Sections 302/906), ICFR assessments (Section 404), and penalties.
    • Core areas: entity-level controls, ITGCs, process controls, governance.
    • Built on PCAOB standards; no fixed control count, focuses on key controls.
    • Compliance model: annual management assertion, auditor attestation for most filers.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances investor trust, reduces fraud risk, improves governance. Mandatory for U.S. public issuers; drives operational efficiency, M&A readiness. Builds stakeholder confidence via transparency.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: scoping, documentation, testing, remediation, monitoring. Applies to public companies; scales by size. Requires external audits under PCAOB rules, continuous monitoring for maturity.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation, space, and defense (ASD) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a process-based, risk-oriented approach across 10 clauses aligned to Annex SL.

    Key Components

    • Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4), operational risk management (8.1.1).
    • Core structure: Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Built on ISO 9001; certification via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • OEM mandates for supply chain access via OASIS database.
    • Reduces defects, improves delivery, ensures safety/traceability.
    • Enhances risk management, supplier performance, market competitiveness.
    • Builds stakeholder trust in high-consequence industries.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-18 months).
    • Applies to ASD designers/manufacturers globally; cross-functional effort required.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    SOX
    Financial reporting, internal controls (ICFR)
    AS9100
    Aerospace quality management, product safety

    Industry

    SOX
    Public companies, all sectors (US-listed)
    AS9100
    Aviation, space, defense suppliers globally

    Nature

    SOX
    Mandatory US federal law, SEC/PCAOB enforced
    AS9100
    Voluntary certification standard (IAQG)

    Testing

    SOX
    Annual ICFR audits by external auditors
    AS9100
    Stage 1/2 certification, annual surveillance audits

    Penalties

    SOX
    Criminal fines, imprisonment for executives
    AS9100
    Loss of certification, market exclusion

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SOX and AS9100

    SOX FAQ

    AS9100 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages