SOX
U.S. law mandating financial reporting internal controls
ISO 30301
International standard for records management systems
Quick Verdict
SOX mandates financial reporting controls for U.S. public companies with severe penalties, while ISO 30301 offers voluntary records management certification for any organization. Companies adopt SOX for legal compliance; ISO 30301 for governance, efficiency, and global trust.
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- Mandates ICFR assessment and auditor attestation (Section 404)
- Requires CEO/CFO personal financial certifications (Sections 302/906)
- Establishes PCAOB for independent audit oversight
- Enforces auditor independence via service prohibitions (Title II)
- Imposes criminal penalties for document tampering (Section 802)
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
- Normative Annex A operational records controls
- Explicit records requirements analysis (Clause 4.1.2)
- Flexible conformity pathways (self-declaration to certification)
- Risk-based planning with measurable objectives
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOX Details
What It Is
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute for corporate governance and investor protection. Enacted post-Enron scandals, it mandates accurate financial disclosures through risk-based internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) assessments, primarily via COSO framework.
Key Components
- **11 TitlesPCAOB establishment (Title I), auditor independence (II), executive certifications (III), enhanced disclosures (IV), penalties (VIII-XI).
- Core sections: 404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), 302/906 (CEO/CFO certifications), 409 (real-time disclosures).
- Relies on PCAOB standards; compliance via annual 10-K reporting and auditor opinions.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for U.S. public companies and listed foreign issuers.
- Reduces fraud risk, builds investor trust, improves efficiency.
- Enables IPO/M&A readiness, lowers capital costs via strong governance.
Implementation Overview
- **Top-down, phased approachscoping, documentation, testing, remediation, monitoring.
- Targets public issuers; involves ITGC, key controls.
- 404(b) requires auditor attestation for accelerated filers; continuous monitoring essential.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 is the international standard titled Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements. It is a certifiable management system framework specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). Its primary purpose is to ensure organizations create, control, and manage authoritative records supporting business activities, using a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with the High-Level Structure (HLS).
Key Components
- **HLS clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 + Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Core principles: Authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- **Flexible conformitySelf-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances governance, compliance (legal/regulatory), and risk management (evidence loss, disputes).
- Drives efficiency, auditability, and strategic use of records as assets.
- Builds stakeholder trust via transparency and certification.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits.
- Applies to any organization/size/sector; integrates with ISO 9001/27001.
- Certification via accredited bodies (ISO/IEC 17065).
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOX | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Financial reporting internal controls (ICFR) | Records management system lifecycle controls |
| Industry | U.S. public companies, financial reporting | Any organization worldwide, all sectors |
| Nature | Mandatory U.S. federal law with SEC enforcement | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Annual ICFR audits by external PCAOB auditors | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Criminal fines up to $5M, 20 years imprisonment | No legal penalties, loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOX and ISO 30301
SOX FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AS9100 vs Basel III
Discover AS9100 vs Basel III: Aerospace QMS standards vs banking capital/liquidity rules. Compare compliance, risks, implementation—unlock expert insights for industry leaders now.
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ISO 31000
Discover CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs ISO 31000: Align compliance mandates with global risk principles for strategic edge in China. Expert comparison & roadmap awaits!
ITIL vs UAE PDPL
ITIL vs UAE PDPL: Align ITIL 4's SVS & practices with PDPL's data security mandates. Cut risks, boost compliance & ITSM efficiency—compare frameworks now!