What is the primary objective of **SQF**?

**The primary objective of SQF is to provide a rigorous, HACCP-based food safety management system that assures consistent production of safe food products across the supply chain.** Administered by the SQF Institute (SQFI), it combines universal **Module 2 System Elements** (management commitment, HACCP Food Safety Plan, verification, traceability) with sector-specific Good Practices modules (e.g., **Module 11** for food manufacturing GMPs). This GFSI-benchmarked framework ensures "say what you do, do what you say, prove it" through documented controls, PRPs, and continuous improvement, enabling global market access for retailers and brands.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SQF**?

**SQF compliance is voluntary but professionally required for suppliers to major retailers, brand owners, and foodservice providers worldwide.** It applies to food sector categories (FSCs) including manufacturing (**Module 2 + 11**), storage/distribution, packaging, primary production, pet food, and supplements. Over 14,000 sites in 40+ countries pursue certification as a de facto "license to trade," with senior management mandating an on-site, full-time **SQF Practitioner** (HACCP-trained) for implementation.

Does **SQF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SQF mandates annual third-party audits by SQFI-licensed Certification Bodies (CBs) accredited to ISO/IEC 17065.** Initial certification, surveillance, and recertification audits (with unannounced audits every 3 years) use graded nonconformities: minor (1 pt), major (5 pts), critical (50 pts). Passing scores: E (96–100), G (86–95), C (70–85), F (<70). Certificates are publicly listed, with auditor safeguards like 3-cycle rotation.

How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits, with internal audits performed at planned frequencies covering all elements.** **Management reviews** occur at least annually (with monthly SQF Practitioner updates), while verification/monitoring (2.5.2) and validation (2.5.1) are ongoing. Crisis/recall plans must be tested annually, aligning with Edition 9 effective May 2021 requirements for sustained compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and commercial exclusion from GFSI-recognized supply chains.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; majors require 30-day corrective action closure. Repeat failures lead to delisting, lost contracts, recalls, and heightened regulatory scrutiny, undermining market access.

An **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps directly to GFSI-benchmarked frameworks due to its alignment with Codex HACCP, NACMCF principles, and FSMA preventive controls.** **Module 2** elements (document control, CAPA, internal audits) share ISO-style structure, enabling layering of SQF Quality Code atop existing HACCP/ISO 22000 systems without full duplication.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is site registration in the SQFI assessment database and designation of a competent, full-time SQF Practitioner.** Conduct a gap analysis against **Edition 9** (Module 2 + relevant sector module), secure senior management commitment via a signed Food Safety Policy, and develop the HACCP-based plan.

What is the primary objective of **SAMA CSF**?

**The primary objective of SAMA CSF is to create a common approach for addressing cybersecurity across Member Organizations, achieve appropriate maturity levels of cybersecurity controls, and ensure cybersecurity risks are properly managed.** Version 1.0 (May 2017) prescribes principles, objectives, and control considerations across four domains—Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, and Third Party Cyber Security—using a six-level maturity model targeting at least Level 3 (Structured and Formalized).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAMA CSF**?

**SAMA CSF is mandatory for all SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia, including banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies, credit bureaus, and Financial Market Infrastructure providers.** All domains apply fully to banks; non-banks may exclude certain subdomains (e.g., Payment Systems) if not applicable. Boards, Senior Management, CISOs, Chief Risk Officers, IT leaders, and Third-Party Risk Managers bear direct accountability.

Does **SAMA CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, SAMA CSF does not require external audit or third-party certification; compliance is demonstrated through periodic self-assessments using SAMA-provided questionnaires and subject to SAMA supervisory review and audits.** Internal audits must align with the framework, with evidence including policies, maturity assessments, and control artifacts maintained in a GRC system.

How often should an assessment for **SAMA CSF** be performed?

**SAMA CSF requires periodic self-assessments using official questionnaires, with frequency determined by SAMA and typically aligned to annual cycles or triggered by material changes.** Assessments evaluate maturity across domains (Levels 0-5), with annual reviews of critical assets, penetration testing for customer-facing services, and ongoing monitoring via KPIs (Level 3) and KRIs (Level 4+).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAMA CSF**?

**Non-compliance with SAMA CSF triggers regulatory enforcement actions by SAMA, including supervisory interventions, remediation demands, heightened scrutiny, audit findings, and potential restrictions on operations.** As a mandated framework, violations invoke broader banking laws, leading to elevated risk profiles, operational impacts, financial liabilities from incidents, and reputational damage; SAMA expects minimum Level 3 maturity.

An **SAMA CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SAMA CSF can be mapped to international frameworks such as NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, and BASEL, as it is explicitly based on these standards.** Domains align with NIST functions (Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover), ISO 27001 ISMS, and PCI-DSS/SWIFT for payments; integrated implementations using GRC tools enable dual-compliance without duplication.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAMA CSF**?

**The first step to implement SAMA CSF is to secure Board and Senior Management sponsorship, establish a project charter, and conduct a control-level gap analysis against the framework's maturity model.** Phase 1 (Initiation & Gap Analysis) includes inventorying applicable domains/subdomains, baseline maturity assessment (targeting Level 3+), and forming governance with CISO oversight.

SQF vs SAMA CSF

Q: How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits, with internal audits performed at planned frequencies covering all elements.** **Management reviews** occur at least annually (with monthly SQF Practitioner updates), while verification/monitoring (2.5.2) and validation (2.5.1) are ongoing. Crisis/recall plans must be tested annually, aligning with Edition 9 effective May 2021 requirements for sustained compliance.

Q: What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and commercial exclusion from GFSI-recognized supply chains.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; majors require 30-day corrective action closure. Repeat failures lead to delisting, lost contracts, recalls, and heightened regulatory scrutiny, undermining market access.

Q: An **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps directly to GFSI-benchmarked frameworks due to its alignment with Codex HACCP, NACMCF principles, and FSMA preventive controls.** **Module 2** elements (document control, CAPA, internal audits) share ISO-style structure, enabling layering of SQF Quality Code atop existing HACCP/ISO 22000 systems without full duplication.

Q: What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is site registration in the SQFI assessment database and designation of a competent, full-time SQF Practitioner.** Conduct a gap analysis against **Edition 9** (Module 2 + relevant sector module), secure senior management commitment via a signed Food Safety Policy, and develop the HACCP-based plan.

Q: What is the primary objective of **SAMA CSF**?

**The primary objective of SAMA CSF is to create a common approach for addressing cybersecurity across Member Organizations, achieve appropriate maturity levels of cybersecurity controls, and ensure cybersecurity risks are properly managed.** Version 1.0 (May 2017) prescribes principles, objectives, and control considerations across four domains—Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, and Third Party Cyber Security—using a six-level maturity model targeting at least Level 3 (Structured and Formalized).

Q: Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAMA CSF**?

**SAMA CSF is mandatory for all SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia, including banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies, credit bureaus, and Financial Market Infrastructure providers.** All domains apply fully to banks; non-banks may exclude certain subdomains (e.g., Payment Systems) if not applicable. Boards, Senior Management, CISOs, Chief Risk Officers, IT leaders, and Third-Party Risk Managers bear direct accountability.

Q: Does **SAMA CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, SAMA CSF does not require external audit or third-party certification; compliance is demonstrated through periodic self-assessments using SAMA-provided questionnaires and subject to SAMA supervisory review and audits.** Internal audits must align with the framework, with evidence including policies, maturity assessments, and control artifacts maintained in a GRC system.

Standards Comparison

SQF

Voluntary

2023

GFSI-benchmarked food safety certification for supply chains

SAMA CSF

Mandatory

2017

Saudi framework for financial cybersecurity maturity and compliance

Quick Verdict

SQF ensures food safety certification for global supply chains via HACCP and audits, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi finance with governance and risk controls. Food firms adopt SQF for market access; banks use SAMA CSF for regulatory compliance.

Agile Scaling

SQF

SQF Food Safety Code Edition 9

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular structure: universal Module 2 plus sector GMPs
HACCP-based Food Safety Plan with validation
Mandates full-time onsite SQF Practitioner
GFSI-benchmarked for global supply chain acceptance
Graded audits with unannounced verification

Cybersecurity

SAMA CSF

SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
Four domains with detailed financial controls
Board-level governance and CISO requirements
Third-party risk management mandates
Self-assessment and SAMA audit compliance

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SQF Details

What It Is

SQF Food Safety Code Edition 9 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program administered by SQFI. It provides a HACCP-based management system for food safety across supply chains, from farm to fork, using modular architecture for sector-specific application.

Key Components

**Module 2Universal system elements including management commitment, HACCP plans, verification, traceability, food defense, allergens, training.
Sector modules (e.g., Module 11 for manufacturing GMPs).
Built on Codex HACCP principles; over 20 mandatory elements.
Third-party audits with graded scoring (E/G/C/F) and unannounced checks.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets retailer mandates for market access.
Reduces recalls, audit duplication, enhances resilience.
Builds food safety culture via leadership accountability.
Aligns with FSMA, EU regulations for due diligence.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification.
Applies to manufacturers, storage, distributors; scalable by size.
Requires SQF Practitioner, annual audits by accredited bodies.

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

SAMA Cyber Security Framework (CSF) Version 1.0 is a mandatory regulatory framework issued by the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority in May 2017. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented blueprint for cybersecurity in SAMA-regulated financial institutions, including banks, insurers, and financing companies. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, controls, and a maturity model to detect, resist, respond, and recover from threats.

Key Components

Four domains: Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Security.
Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
Six-level Cyber Security Maturity Model (Level 3 minimum: structured policies, standards, procedures).
Aligned with NIST, ISO 27001; self-assessment and SAMA audits for compliance.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, audits, fines.
Enhances resilience, reduces incidents, supports strategic partnerships.
Builds trust, efficiency, competitive edge in Saudi's digital finance sector.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, control roadmap, deployment, monitoring, audits.
Targets financial sector in Saudi Arabia; scalable by size.
Requires self-assessments, evidence portfolios; no external certification but SAMA review.

Key Differences

Aspect	SQF	SAMA CSF
Scope	Food safety management, HACCP, GMPs, traceability	Cybersecurity governance, risk mgmt, operations, third-party
Industry	Global food supply chain, manufacturing to retail	Saudi financial sector: banks, insurance, fintech
Nature	Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification	Mandatory regulatory framework for compliance
Testing	Annual third-party audits, unannounced, scoring	Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits, maturity model
Penalties	Certification loss, market access denial	Fines, supervisory actions, license risks

Scope

SQF

Food safety management, HACCP, GMPs, traceability

SAMA CSF

Cybersecurity governance, risk mgmt, operations, third-party

Industry

SQF

Global food supply chain, manufacturing to retail

SAMA CSF

Saudi financial sector: banks, insurance, fintech

Nature

SQF

Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification

SAMA CSF

Mandatory regulatory framework for compliance

Testing

SQF

Annual third-party audits, unannounced, scoring

SAMA CSF

Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits, maturity model

Penalties

SQF

Certification loss, market access denial

SAMA CSF

Fines, supervisory actions, license risks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SQF and SAMA CSF

SQF FAQ

SAMA CSF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UL Certification vs WCAG

UL Certification vs WCAG: Compare safety marks (Listed/Recognized), NRTL testing & audits with POUR principles, AA conformance for web accessibility. Ensure compliance, cut risks—explore now!

NIST 800-53 vs FSSC 22000

Compare NIST 800-53 vs FSSC 22000: Cyber controls meet food safety standards. Key differences in families, baselines, RMF integration & PRPs. Boost compliance—read now!

COPPA vs FSSC 22000

Discover COPPA vs FSSC 22000: Compare child privacy rules (fines up to $43K) with food safety standards (GFSI-benchmarked). Master compliance—expert guide now!

SQF

SAMA CSF

Quick Verdict

SQF

Key Features

SAMA CSF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SQF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SAMA CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SQF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SQF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SQF?

Does SQF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SQF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SQF?

An SQF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SQF?

SAMA CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SAMA CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SAMA CSF?

Does SAMA CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SAMA CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SAMA CSF?

An SAMA CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SAMA CSF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UL Certification vs WCAG

NIST 800-53 vs FSSC 22000

COPPA vs FSSC 22000