TISAX
Automotive framework for standardized information security assessments and exchange
BRC
Global standard for food safety in manufacturing
Quick Verdict
TISAX ensures information security for automotive suppliers via standardized assessments, while BRC mandates food safety management for manufacturers through HACCP and audits. Companies adopt TISAX for OEM contracts; BRC for retailer access and GFSI compliance.
TISAX
Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)
Key Features
- Enables sharing one assessment across multiple OEMs via ENX portal
- Tailored prototype protection controls for automotive IP and assets
- Three risk-based assessment levels matching protection needs
- Maturity evaluation of 70+ VDA ISA controls on 0-5 scale
- Three-year labels without annual surveillance audits
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9
Key Features
- Codex HACCP-based food safety plan
- Senior management commitment and culture
- Fundamental requirements for certification
- Environmental monitoring and risk zoning
- Unannounced audits with grading system
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TISAX Details
What It Is
TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is a certification framework by ENX Association, based on VDA ISA catalog. It standardizes security assessments for automotive supply chains, protecting IP, prototypes, and data via CIA triad extensions. Uses risk-based methodology with three levels: AL1 (self), AL2 (remote), AL3 (on-site).
Key Components
- 70+ controls in 7 groups: Policy, Access, Operations, etc.
- Modules: Information Security, Prototype Protection, Data Protection
- Maturity scale 0-5 (level 3+ required)
- Builds on ISO 27001; ENX portal exchanges results
- 3-year labels post-audit
Why Organizations Use It
- OEM contractual mandates (e.g., BMW, VW)
- Cuts duplicate audits 70-90%, saves costs
- Mitigates breaches, enables market access
- Builds supply chain trust, boosts revenue
- ESG/resilience advantages
Implementation Overview
Phased: scope/gap analysis, control remediation/tabletops, accredited audit (DQS/TÜV), monitoring. Suits OEMs/suppliers/services globally; scalable for SMEs/enterprises via self-assess to full audits.
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It assures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality via a structured system integrating senior management commitment, Codex HACCP-based plans, and GMP prerequisites. Scope includes processed foods, ingredients, primary products, and pet foods under site control.
Key Components
- Seven core clauses: senior management, food safety plan, FSQMS, site standards, product control, process control, personnel.
- Fundamental requirements (e.g., HACCP, traceability, allergens, internal audits).
- Risk-based hazard analysis including fraud, defence.
- Graded certification (AA/A/B/C/D) via annual audits, announced/unannounced.
Why Organizations Use It
- Retailer mandates for supply chain access.
- Reduces recalls, contamination risks.
- Demonstrates due diligence, builds trust.
- Drives efficiencies, continuous improvement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, mock audits.
- 6-12 months typical for mid-maturity sites.
- Global applicability for food manufacturers.
- Accredited body certification required.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TISAX | BRC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Information security, prototype protection | Food safety, quality, HACCP plans |
| Industry | Automotive supply chain, global | Food manufacturing, packaging, global |
| Nature | Voluntary certification, industry-driven | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification |
| Testing | AL1-3 assessments, 3-year validity | Annual on-site audits, grading system |
| Penalties | Contract loss, no legal fines | Certification withdrawal, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TISAX and BRC
TISAX FAQ
BRC FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass
Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
K-PIPA vs IFS Food
Compare K-PIPA vs IFS Food: Decode Korea's strict data privacy law against global food safety standards. Master compliance strategies, slash risks & fines. Read now!
AEO vs IEC 62443
Compare AEO vs IEC 62443: Customs trade security for faster clearance vs OT cybersecurity standards for resilient IACS. Discover differences, benefits & strategies to optimize compliance now.
Six Sigma vs NIST 800-53
Explore Six Sigma vs NIST 800-53: Quality DMAIC meets security baselines. Key diffs, synergies for compliance, risk reduction & ops excellence. Integrate now!