TISAX
Automotive standard for trusted information security assessments
MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management.
Quick Verdict
TISAX standardizes automotive supply chain security via assessments for prototype protection; MAS TRM mandates financial tech risk governance in Singapore. Automotive firms adopt TISAX for OEM contracts; FIs implement TRM to avoid fines and ensure resilience.
TISAX
Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)
Key Features
- Standardized exchange of assessments via ENX portal
- Automotive-specific prototype protection controls
- Risk-based three assessment levels (AL1-AL3)
- Extends ISO 27001 with VDA ISA catalog
- Three-year labels reduce duplicate OEM audits
MAS TRM
MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines
Key Features
- Board and senior management accountability
- Proportional implementation by risk profile
- Third-party services risk management
- Cyber resilience via defence-in-depth
- Annual penetration testing for internet systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TISAX Details
What It Is
TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is an industry framework for standardizing information security assessments in the automotive supply chain. Developed by the ENX Association based on VDA ISA catalog v5.0.4 or later, it verifies protection of sensitive data like prototypes and IP using a risk-based approach with three maturity levels: Basic, Significant, Very High.
Key Components
- 70+ controls across 7 groups: Policy, Organization, Personnel, Physical Security, Access, Cryptography, Operations.
- Modular objectives: Information Security, Prototype Protection, Data Protection.
- Builds on ISO 27001 with automotive specifics.
- ENX portal for secure result exchange; labels valid 3 years.
Why Organizations Use It
OEMs mandate it contractually for suppliers; non-compliance risks contract loss, fines. Provides efficiency (one audit for many partners), market access, risk mitigation, trust in global chains.
Implementation Overview
Phased: Preparation (gap analysis), Remediation (controls, table-tops), Audit (by accredited providers like DQS/TÜV), Sustainment. Suited for SMEs to enterprises in automotive; 6-18 months, scalable via self-assessments.
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidance issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide a principles-based, risk-proportional framework focused on governing technology and cyber risks to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data across governance, operations, and resilience.
Key Components
- 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT service management, resilience, access controls, cryptography, data security, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
- Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset classification, third-party oversight, and defence-in-depth.
- No fixed control count; emphasises outcomes via continuous monitoring, testing, and independent assurance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory supervisory consideration for Singapore FIs to avoid enforcement (fines, license actions).
- Enhances cyber resilience, operational stability, and customer trust amid digital threats.
- Supports proportional risk management, board oversight, and ecosystem-wide protection.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: asset inventory, risk assessment, control design, testing, third-party diligence.
- Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; scales by size/complexity.
- No formal certification; demonstrated via audits, metrics, and supervisory reviews. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | TISAX | MAS TRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Automotive info sec, prototypes, CIA triad | Financial tech risk, cyber resilience, CIA |
| Industry | Automotive supply chain, global | Singapore financial institutions only |
| Nature | Voluntary certification, ENX audits | Supervisory guidelines, enforcement actions |
| Testing | AL1-3 assessments, on-site AL3 audits | Annual PT internet systems, DR tests |
| Penalties | Contract loss, no TISAX label | Fines, license revocation, prohibitions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TISAX and MAS TRM
TISAX FAQ
MAS TRM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers
Slash CMMC costs 30-50% with top 10 hacks for small DIB suppliers. Enclave scoping, FedRAMP clouds, automation, POA&M tips & budgeting blueprints for Level 2 co

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y

CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PDPA vs MAS TRM
Unlock PDPA vs MAS TRM: Compare Singapore's data privacy laws with financial tech risk guidelines. Master compliance, governance & resilience strategies for seamless operations.
COPPA vs ISO 27032
Discover COPPA vs ISO 27032: U.S. child privacy law battles global Internet cybersecurity guidelines. Avoid $170M fines, master consent & secure kids' data online. Compare now!
ISO 19600 vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare ISO 19600 vs Australian Privacy Act: CMS guidelines for governance, risk & PDCA vs APPs, NDB scheme & OAIC enforcement. Align for scalable compliance. Dive in now.