TISAX
Automotive standard for trusted security assessments exchange
SOX
U.S. law mandating internal controls for financial reporting integrity
Quick Verdict
TISAX standardizes automotive supply chain info security via assessments for OEM trust, while SOX mandates US public company financial controls and certifications for investor protection. Automotive firms adopt TISAX contractually; publics comply with SOX legally.
TISAX
Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)
Key Features
- Centralized ENX portal shares assessments ecosystem-wide
- Prototype protection for parts, vehicles, and events
- Three risk-based levels: AL1 self-assess to AL3 onsite
- Maturity-scaled VDA ISA controls beyond ISO 27001
- Three-year labels reduce duplicate OEM audits
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- CEO/CFO personal certification of financial accuracy
- ICFR management assessment and auditor attestation
- PCAOB oversight of public company auditors
- Auditor independence and rotation requirements
- Whistleblower protections and anti-retaliation rules
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TISAX Details
What It Is
TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is an industry framework developed by ENX Association and VDA for automotive supply chain security. It standardizes assessments of information protection, using VDA ISA catalog v5.0.4 or later with risk-based methodology across CIA triad plus prototypes.
Key Components
- 70+ controls in 7 groups: policy, organization, personnel, physical security, access, cryptography, operations.
- Three levels: AL1 self-assessment, AL2 remote check, AL3 onsite audit.
- Modules for prototypes, data protection; maturity scale 0-5.
- Builds on ISO 27001; ENX portal for label exchange (3-year validity).
Why Organizations Use It
OEMs mandate for suppliers handling IP/prototypes; prevents contract loss, fines. Enables market access, cuts duplicate audits 70-90%, boosts resilience. Builds trust, ROI via risk mitigation (€4.5M breach avoidance).
Implementation Overview
Phased: scope/gap (1-3mo), remediate/tabletops (3-9mo), audit (2-4mo); 6-18 months total. For SMEs to globals in automotive; requires accredited auditors like DQS/TÜV.
SOX Details
What It Is
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute establishing corporate accountability standards. It mandates accurate financial disclosures and robust internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) for public companies. SOX employs a risk-based, control-oriented approach via SEC rules and PCAOB standards.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive accountability (Titles III–XI).
- Key sections: 302/906 (CEO/CFO certifications), 404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), 409 (real-time disclosures).
- Built on COSO framework; no fixed controls, focuses on key risks.
- Compliance model: annual management reports, auditor attestation for most filers.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate for U.S. public issuers; severe penalties for non-compliance.
- Enhances investor trust, reduces restatements, lowers capital costs.
- Improves governance, fraud deterrence, operational efficiency.
- Boosts M&A/IPO readiness and reputation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, documentation, testing, monitoring.
- Activities: risk assessment, control design, ITGC, continuous monitoring.
- Applies to public companies; scalable by size.
- Requires external audit for 404(b) filers. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | TISAX | SOX |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Automotive info security, prototypes, CIA triad | Financial reporting, ICFR, governance, disclosures |
| Industry | Automotive supply chain, global but Europe-focused | All US-listed public companies, financial reporting |
| Nature | Voluntary industry assessment, contractual via ENX | Mandatory US federal law, SEC/PCAOB enforced |
| Testing | AL1-AL3 self/audit, 3-year labels, ENX portal | Annual ICFR assessment/attestation, PCAOB standards |
| Penalties | Contract loss, no legal fines, OEM exclusion | Criminal fines/imprisonment, SEC fines, restatements |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TISAX and SOX
TISAX FAQ
SOX FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!
Discover why NIST CSF 2.0 is a life-saver for organizations. This flexible framework's 6 functions—Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—boost res
ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva
Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PIPL vs ISO 14001
PIPL vs ISO 14001: Compare China's data privacy powerhouse with global EMS standard. Unlock compliance risks, strategies & phased frameworks for resilient ops. Dive in now!
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs CIS Controls
Discover MLPS 2.0 vs CIS Controls: China's mandatory graded cybersecurity vs global best practices. Uncover gaps, alignments & strategies for China ops compliance now.
IFS Food vs ISO 19600
Compare IFS Food vs ISO 19600: Decode food safety audits, governance & compliance gaps for manufacturers. Pick the ideal standard for risk-based excellence. Dive in!