TISAX
Automotive framework for standardized information security assessments
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC regulation for cybersecurity incident and governance disclosures
Quick Verdict
TISAX certifies automotive supply chain security via audits for OEM trust, while U.S. SEC rules mandate public firms disclose material cyber incidents in 4 days and annual governance to protect investors.
TISAX
Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)
Key Features
- Standardized exchange of assessments via ENX portal
- Automotive-specific prototype protection controls
- Three-tiered assessment levels (AL1-AL3)
- VDA ISA catalog based on ISO 27001
- Three-year labels with mutual recognition
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day material incident disclosure on Form 8-K
- Annual risk management and governance in Item 106
- Board oversight and management role disclosures
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data
- Materiality determination without unreasonable delay
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TISAX Details
What It Is
TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is an industry-specific assessment framework for information security in the automotive supply chain. Developed by the ENX Association based on the VDA ISA catalog version 5.0.4, it verifies protection of sensitive data like prototypes and IP using risk-based assessments at three levels: Basic (AL1), Significant (AL2), and Very High (AL3).
Key Components
- 70+ controls across 7 groups: Policy, Organization, Personnel, Physical Security, Access Control, Cryptography, Operations.
- Automotive extensions for prototype protection, high availability, and data protection.
- Built on ISO 27001 with maturity scoring (0-3+).
- ENX portal for registration, audits, and result exchange; labels valid 3 years.
Why Organizations Use It
OEMs mandate TISAX contractually, preventing revenue loss (€10-50M) and access denial. It reduces duplicate audits (70-90% efficiency), enables market access, mitigates breaches (€4.5M avg), and builds trust in €2.5T supply chain.
Implementation Overview
Phased: Preparation (scope, gap analysis), Remediation (controls, table-tops), Audit (by accredited providers like DQS/TÜV), Sustainment. Targets automotive OEMs, Tier 1/2 suppliers, service providers; scalable for SMEs to enterprises; 6-18 months, €15K-€150K+.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) is a federal regulation mandating standardized disclosures for public companies under the Securities Exchange Act. It focuses on timely reporting of material cybersecurity incidents and annual descriptions of risk management, strategy, and governance, using a materiality-based approach aligned with securities law precedents like TSC Industries v. Northway.
Key Components
- **Incident disclosureForm 8-K Item 1.05 requires reporting material incidents within four business days of determination.
- **Periodic disclosuresRegulation S-K Item 106 covers risk processes, strategy impacts, board oversight, and management roles.
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data.
- Built on existing disclosure controls; no fixed controls but process descriptions; compliance via filings, no separate certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Public companies comply to meet legal obligations, protect investors, enhance market efficiency, and reduce enforcement risks like fines seen in Yahoo and Ashford cases. It integrates cyber risk into ERM, builds stakeholder trust, and supports competitive positioning through transparent governance.
Implementation Overview
Involves gap analysis, materiality playbooks, cross-functional committees, IRP updates, and XBRL readiness. Applies to all Exchange Act registrants (domestic, FPIs, SRCs, EGCs); phased compliance from Dec 2023. No external certification but SEC review and enforcement apply.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TISAX | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Automotive supply chain info sec & prototypes | Public company cyber incident & governance disclosure |
| Industry | Automotive OEMs, Tier 1-2 suppliers globally | All SEC registrants, financial reporting focus |
| Nature | Voluntary industry assessment & certification | Mandatory SEC regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | AL1-3 audits by ENX providers every 3 years | Materiality determination & 4-day 8-K filing |
| Penalties | Contract loss, no TISAX label, OEM exclusion | SEC fines, enforcement, shareholder litigation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TISAX and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
TISAX FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i
Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PCI DSS vs ISO 27001
PCI DSS vs ISO 27001: Compare PCI's 12 granular card data controls vs ISO's risk-based ISMS. Discover key differences, compliance paths & best fit for your security needs now.
ISO 14001 vs IEC 62443
Discover ISO 14001 vs IEC 62443: Compare EMS for sustainability with IACS cybersecurity standards. Enhance compliance, risk management & integration. Unlock expert insights now!
DORA vs PCI DSS
DORA vs PCI DSS: EU finance resilience regulation meets card data security standard. Compare scopes, ICT risks, reporting & third-party rules for 2025 compliance mastery.