What is the primary objective of **TOGAF**?

**TOGAF's primary objective is to provide a proven, vendor-neutral methodology and framework for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise architecture to improve business efficiency.** It establishes consistent standards, methods, and communication among architecture professionals through the **Architecture Development Method (ADM)**, **Content Framework**, **Enterprise Continuum**, and **Architecture Capability Framework**, enabling alignment of business strategy with IT execution while promoting reuse and avoiding proprietary lock-in.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **TOGAF**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with TOGAF, as it is a voluntary, vendor-neutral standard developed by The Open Group.** Professionally, it is adopted by leading enterprises, government agencies, and regulated industries (e.g., finance, defense) undertaking complex IT modernization or digital transformation, where architects and C-suites seek repeatable EA practices; certification is recommended for practitioners to ensure consistent application.

Does **TOGAF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**TOGAF does not require external audits or third-party certification for organizational compliance.** It emphasizes internal **Architecture Board** governance, compliance reviews, and **Architecture Contracts** during **Phase G (Implementation Governance)**; The Open Group offers practitioner certifications (e.g., TOGAF 9.2/10th Edition), but enterprise adoption relies on self-assessed maturity via the **Architecture Capability Maturity Model (ACMM)**.

How often should an assessment for **TOGAF** be performed?

**TOGAF assessments should be performed iteratively through ongoing ADM cycles, with formal maturity reviews quarterly via the Architecture Capability Maturity Model (ACMM).** **Phase H (Architecture Change Management)** mandates continuous monitoring of change triggers, while **Requirements Management** ensures perpetual alignment; organizations typically conduct full ACMM evaluations annually or upon major transformations to track progress across nine elements like governance and business linkage.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **TOGAF**?

**Non-compliance with TOGAF results in no legal penalties, as it is a voluntary framework, but leads to operational risks like fragmented architectures, duplicated efforts, vendor lock-in, and failed transformations.** Internally, it undermines **Architecture Board** enforcement, reduces ROI from poor reuse via the **Enterprise Continuum**, and exposes enterprises to higher costs, integration failures, and unaligned IT investments without governance traceability.

Can **TOGAF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, TOGAF is designed for integration and mapping to other frameworks through its modular structure and Content Metamodel.** The **Enterprise Continuum** and **ADM Techniques** support alignments (e.g., with ArchiMate for modeling), while **TOGAF 10th Edition Series Guides** provide explicit configuration guidance for hybrid models, enabling traceability of artifacts like deliverables and building blocks across governance and operational standards.

What is the first step to begin implementing **TOGAF**?

**The first step to implement TOGAF is the Preliminary Phase: establish the architecture capability by defining principles, tailoring the framework, selecting tools, and setting up the Architecture Repository.** This includes forming the **Architecture Board**, clarifying business drivers via a **Request for Architecture Work**, and conducting a maturity assessment to scope iterative ADM application effectively.

What is the primary objective of **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B establishes quality management system requirements for aerospace distributors that procure, store, split, and resell parts without altering characteristics.** Built on ISO 9001:2015’s 10-clause structure, it adds over 100 aerospace-specific controls targeting distribution risks like traceability loss, counterfeit parts infiltration, documentation errors, and external provider weaknesses. Core focus areas include chain-of-custody preservation (Clauses 8.5.2, 8.1), counterfeit/suspected unapproved parts prevention (Clauses 8.1.4-8.1.5), configuration management (Clause 8.1.2), and risk-based supplier controls (Clause 8.4), enabling auditable conformity from receipt to delivery.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B applies to aviation, space, and defense distributors performing purchase, storage, splitting, or resale without changing product characteristics.** It targets stockist distributors, pass-through distributors, and batch splitters, excluding value-added activities like machining or MRO. Certification is not legally mandatory but commercially essential: OEMs and primes often require it for supply chain approval, with 2,442 global certifications (836 in U.S.) as of May 2023 providing OASIS visibility and market access.

Does **AS9120B** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**AS9120B requires third-party certification through accredited bodies for formal recognition.** Organizations undergo Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (on-site effectiveness audit) per IAQG rules, leading to 3-year certification with annual surveillance audits and triennial recertification. Internal audits (Clause 9.2) are mandatory but insufficient alone; certification lists in OASIS, functioning as a de facto market entry criterion.

How often should an assessment for **AS9120B** be performed?

**AS9120B mandates internal audits at planned intervals to cover the full QMS annually (Clause 9.2).** Audits must ensure conformity and effectiveness using process-based methods like PEAR/Turtle diagrams. Management reviews occur at planned intervals (Clause 9.3), typically quarterly, evaluating performance trends, risks, and supplier data. Surveillance audits by certification bodies follow annually post-initial certification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9120B**?

**Non-compliance with AS9120B risks commercial exclusion, supply chain rejection, and operational liabilities.** Lacking certification bars access to OEM/Tier 1 contracts and OASIS listing. Audit failures yield major nonconformities in traceability, counterfeit controls, or supplier evaluation, potentially delaying certification 6-12 months. Safety incidents from poor chain-of-custody invite recalls, penalties, and reputational damage in ASD sectors.

Can **AS9120B** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**AS9120B aligns directly with ISO 9001:2015’s high-level structure, enabling seamless mapping of its 10 clauses.** It augments ISO requirements with aerospace additions (e.g., counterfeit prevention, traceability for split lots), allowing integrated QMS for dual-certified distributors. Clause-by-clause comparisons show full ISO compliance plus IAQG specifics, facilitating transitions without redesign.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9120B**?

**The first step is conducting a formal gap analysis against AS9120B clauses using a tailored checklist.** Assemble a cross-functional team to map current processes to Clauses 4-10, prioritizing distributor risks like supplier controls (8.4) and traceability (8.5.2). Document scope (Clause 4.3), justify non-applicabilities (e.g., 8.3 design), and produce a prioritized risk register to inform the implementation backlog.

TOGAF vs AS9120B

Standards Comparison

TOGAF

Voluntary

2022

Vendor-neutral enterprise architecture methodology and framework

AS9120B

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for distributors of unaltered parts.

Quick Verdict

TOGAF provides a voluntary enterprise architecture framework for aligning business and IT across industries, while AS9120B is a mandatory certification standard for aerospace distributors ensuring traceability, counterfeit prevention, and supply chain quality.

Enterprise Architecture

TOGAF

TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

1. Iterative ADM lifecycle for architecture development
2. Content Metamodel ensuring traceability and consistency
3. Enterprise Continuum for reusable asset classification
4. Foundation Reference Models like TRM and III-RM
5. Architecture Capability Framework with governance board

Quality Management

AS9120B

AS9120B: Quality Management Systems for Distributors

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
Traceability and chain-of-custody controls for split lots
Risk-based external provider evaluation and monitoring
Configuration management via sales order records
Product preservation and shelf-life management

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

TOGAF Details

What It Is

TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. Its primary scope spans business, data, application, and technology domains using an iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM).

Key Components

**ADM phasesPreliminary to Change Management, plus continuous Requirements Management.
**Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts (catalogs, matrices, diagrams), building blocks.
Enterprise Continuum and Architecture Repository for reuse.
**Reference ModelsTRM, SIB, III-RM.
**Capability FrameworkGovernance, skills, maturity models. No fixed controls; voluntary certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns strategy with IT for efficiency, reuse, risk reduction; avoids vendor lock-in; enables governance and ROI. Strategic for large enterprises in regulated industries; builds stakeholder trust via traceability.

Implementation Overview

Tailored, iterative ADM cycles with pilots; key activities include maturity assessment, repository setup, board formation. Suits large organizations across industries; no mandatory audits, focuses on capability building.

AS9120B Details

What It Is

AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aerospace distributors, based on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure. It targets organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without altering characteristics, using a risk-based approach to address supply chain risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.

Key Components

Over 100 aerospace-specific requirements beyond ISO 9001.
Pillars: context analysis, leadership, risk planning, support, operations (traceability, counterfeit prevention, supplier controls), performance evaluation, improvement.
Built on PDCA cycle; requires documented information, not full manual.
Certification via accredited bodies, OASIS listing.

Why Organizations Use It

Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
Mitigates risks of nonconformities, counterfeits; builds trust.
Enhances efficiency, market access (2,442 global certifications).
Differentiates via rigorous chain-of-custody controls.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
Applies to aviation/space/defense distributors globally.
Involves cross-functional teams, internal audits, management reviews.

Key Differences

Aspect	TOGAF	AS9120B
Scope	Enterprise architecture lifecycle and governance	Aerospace distribution quality management system
Industry	All industries, enterprise-wide IT/business alignment	Aerospace distributors, aviation/space/defense supply chains
Nature	Voluntary methodology and framework	Certification standard based on ISO 9001:2015
Testing	Internal maturity assessments, no formal certification	Third-party audits, Stage 1/2 certification, surveillance
Penalties	No legal penalties, loss of framework benefits	Loss of certification, market exclusion, supply chain rejection

Scope

TOGAF

Enterprise architecture lifecycle and governance

AS9120B

Aerospace distribution quality management system

Industry

TOGAF

All industries, enterprise-wide IT/business alignment

AS9120B

Aerospace distributors, aviation/space/defense supply chains

Nature

TOGAF

Voluntary methodology and framework

AS9120B

Certification standard based on ISO 9001:2015

Testing

TOGAF

Internal maturity assessments, no formal certification

AS9120B

Third-party audits, Stage 1/2 certification, surveillance

Penalties

TOGAF

No legal penalties, loss of framework benefits

AS9120B

Loss of certification, market exclusion, supply chain rejection

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about TOGAF and AS9120B

TOGAF FAQ

AS9120B FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats

Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

AS9110C vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Compare AS9110C vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Key differences in aerospace QMS for MROs vs public disclosure mandates. Uncover gaps, synergies, compliance roadmap. Secure your edge now!

PCI DSS vs APPI

Compare PCI DSS vs APPI: Payment security meets Japan's privacy law. Unpack scopes, controls & compliance diffs for global ops. Safeguard data—read now!

OSHA vs ISO 37001

Compare OSHA vs ISO 37001: Vital standards for workplace safety & anti-bribery compliance. Uncover key differences, implementation strategies & risk mitigation to safeguard your business. Read now!

TOGAF

AS9120B

Quick Verdict

TOGAF

Key Features

AS9120B

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

TOGAF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9120B Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

TOGAF FAQ

What is the primary objective of TOGAF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with TOGAF?

Does TOGAF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for TOGAF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with TOGAF?

Can TOGAF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing TOGAF?

AS9120B FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9120B?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9120B?

Does AS9120B require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9120B be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9120B?

Can AS9120B be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9120B?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

AS9110C vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

PCI DSS vs APPI

OSHA vs ISO 37001