UAE PDPL
UAE federal law regulating personal data protection
Australian Privacy Act
Australian federal law regulating personal information handling
Quick Verdict
UAE PDPL mandates risk-based privacy controls for onshore operations with DPO/DPIA requirements, while Australian Privacy Act enforces principles via OAIC oversight and NDB scheme. Multinationals adopt both for UAE/Australia compliance, aligning with GDPR-like standards to enable secure data flows.
UAE PDPL
Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on Personal Data Protection
Key Features
- Risk-based DPO/DPIA for high-risk processing
- Mandatory detailed records of processing activities
- Extraterritorial scope targeting UAE residents
- Exclusions for free zones and sectoral data
- Prescriptive encryption and pseudonymisation requirements
Australian Privacy Act
Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
Key Features
- 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
- Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme
- Cross-border disclosure accountability (APP 8)
- Reasonable steps for data security (APP 11)
- OAIC enforcement with high penalties
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
UAE PDPL Details
What It Is
UAE PDPL (Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 Concerning the Protection of Personal Data) is a comprehensive federal regulation establishing economy-wide personal data protection in onshore UAE. Effective January 2022, it adopts a risk-based approach with principles like fairness, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy, security, and accountability, applying to controllers/processors handling UAE residents' data, including extraterritorially.
Key Components
- Core processing controls (Articles 4-5), data subject rights (Articles 13-19)
- Mandatory Records of Processing Activities (RoPAs) for all (Articles 7-8)
- DPO appointment and DPIAs for high-risk activities (Articles 10-12, 21)
- Security measures, breach notification (Article 9), cross-border transfers (Articles 22-23)
- Compliance enforced by UAE Data Office via administrative penalties
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for private-sector onshore operations; builds digital trust, aligns with GDPR for multinationals, mitigates fines/reputational risks, enables secure data flows/innovation.
Implementation Overview
Phased: discovery/gap analysis, RoPA/DPIA buildout, security/privacy-by-design, rights workflows, vendor controls. Applies broadly (SMEs to enterprises, excluding free zones/government); no certification but audit-ready records required.
Australian Privacy Act Details
What It Is
The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's primary federal regulation for protecting individual privacy. It establishes baseline standards for handling personal information by government agencies and private sector organizations via the 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). Its principles-based, risk-calibrated approach balances information flows with privacy protections across the data lifecycle.
Key Components
- 13 APPs covering collection, use/disclosure, security (APP 11), cross-border (APP 8), and rights.
- Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme for serious harm incidents.
- OAIC enforcement with civil penalties up to AUD 50M.
- Sector codes (e.g., credit reporting) and exemptions (e.g., small businesses under $3M turnover).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for APP entities to avoid penalties and reputational damage.
- Enhances risk management, trust, and compliance in data-driven operations.
- Supports transborder flows while mitigating breaches.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policies, controls, training, audits. Applies to medium/large orgs, health/credit sectors; no certification but OAIC assessments.
Key Differences
| Aspect | UAE PDPL | Australian Privacy Act |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data processing onshore UAE, excludes free zones/govt/health/banking | Personal info handling by agencies/large orgs, includes NDB scheme |
| Industry | Onshore private sector all industries, UAE territorial with extraterritorial | All sectors >$3M turnover + health/credit/TFN, Australian link extraterritorial |
| Nature | Mandatory federal law with principles, risk-based DPO/DPIA, executive regs pending | Mandatory principles-based law, OAIC enforcement, NDB mandatory notification |
| Testing | DPIAs for high-risk, security testing per best practices, no formal certification | Reasonable steps security, no mandated testing, OAIC audits/assessments |
| Penalties | Administrative fines via Cabinet decision (details pending), criminal overlaps | Up to AUD 50M/30% turnover civil penalties, OAIC enforcement |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about UAE PDPL and Australian Privacy Act
UAE PDPL FAQ
Australian Privacy Act FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EN 1090 vs 23 NYCRR 500
EN 1090 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Compare EU steel/aluminum CE marking standards with NY cybersecurity regs. Master execution classes, FPC certification, risk assessments & compliance strategies now.
ISO 27032 vs BREEAM
ISO 27032 vs BREEAM: Cybersecurity guidelines for Internet threats meet sustainable building certification. Compare scopes, boost resilience, compliance & value—explore key differences now!
CSA vs AS9100
Compare CSA vs AS9100: Key differences in OHS (Z1000/Z1002) vs aerospace QMS standards. Ensure compliance, risk control & safety. Expert insights—choose wisely now!