UL Certification
Third-party certification for product safety via testing and surveillance
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection framework.
Quick Verdict
UL Certification offers voluntary global product safety marks via testing and audits, enabling market access. MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China networks with PSB oversight. Companies pursue UL for trust and sales; MLPS to avoid fines and suspensions.
UL Certification
Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Certification Program
Key Features
- Dual role developing standards and certifying products
- Lifecycle with mandatory factory follow-up inspections
- Distinct marks: Listed for end-products, Recognized for components
- Enhanced/Smart marks bundling safety, security, energy attributes
- NRTL status ensures OSHA regulatory and market acceptance
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0
Key Features
- Five-level impact-based system classification
- Mandatory PSB registration for Level 2+ systems
- Graded technical and governance controls
- Third-party audits with 75/100 pass score
- Ongoing re-evaluations and inspections
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
UL Certification Details
What It Is
UL Certification is the Underwriters Laboratories conformity assessment program, a third-party certification framework evaluating products against UL-authored consensus standards. Its primary purpose is verifying safety, performance, and compliance across industries like electronics and energy. The risk-based approach covers hazards like fire, shock, and emerging risks via lab testing and surveillance.
Key Components
- Core elements: standard selection, representative testing, factory inspections, mark authorization.
- Mark types: UL Listed (end-products), Recognized (components), Classified (limited scope), Verified (claims).
- Attributes: safety, security, energy, health effects.
- Built on NRTL accreditation; ongoing Follow-Up Services ensure compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives market access, retailer acceptance, liability reduction despite voluntary nature. Provides trust signals, ESG alignment, and competitive edge via recognized marks. Mitigates risks in supply chains and high-hazard products.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, design adjustments, lab testing, factory audits, certification. Applies to all sizes across industries globally. Requires initial/ongoing audits; timelines 6-12 months with iterative testing.
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details
What It Is
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2016 Cybersecurity Law. It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, organizational, and governance controls.
Key Components
- Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, and governance.
- Standards like GB/T 22239-2019, GB/T 25070-2019 define baselines, extended for cloud, IoT, big data.
- Five-level model with common controls plus level-specific requirements.
- Compliance via third-party audits (75/100 score), PSB approval for Level 2+.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for China operations to avoid fines, suspensions.
- Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws.
- Builds regulator trust, enables market access.
Implementation Overview
Phased: classify systems, gap analysis, remediate, audit, ongoing re-evals. Applies to all network operators in China; complex for multinationals.
Key Differences
| Aspect | UL Certification | MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Product safety, performance, marks across industries | Graded cybersecurity for all networks, systems in China |
| Industry | All industries globally, any product type | All network operators, China-specific, critical infrastructure |
| Nature | Voluntary third-party certification, NRTL marks | Mandatory legal regulation, PSB enforcement |
| Testing | Lab testing, factory inspections, periodic surveillance | Third-party audits, PSB reviews, annual re-evaluations Level 3+ |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, mark withdrawal, no fines | Fines, operational suspension, license revocation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about UL Certification and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
UL Certification FAQ
MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UAE PDPL vs EU AI Act
Compare UAE PDPL vs EU AI Act: Key diffs in data privacy, high-risk rules, DPIAs/DPOs & transfers. Master compliance for UAE-EU success now!
APPI vs NIST 800-171
APPI vs NIST 800-171: Japan's privacy law meets US CUI safeguards. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & phased implementation for global data protection. Dive in!
ISO 19600 vs ISO 22301
Compare ISO 19600 vs ISO 22301: Compliance guidelines (withdrawn) meet BCM standards. Uncover governance, PDCA cycles, risk integration & ISO 37301 transition for resilient ops. Dive in now!