Standards Comparison

    WCAG

    Voluntary
    2023

    W3C standard for accessible web content to all users

    VS

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for aerospace quality management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    WCAG ensures web accessibility for users with disabilities via testable criteria, while AS9100 mandates aerospace quality management with safety and traceability controls. Organizations adopt WCAG for legal compliance and inclusion; AS9100 for certification and supply chain access.

    Web Accessibility

    WCAG

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • POUR principles organize accessibility into perceivable, operable, understandable, robust
    • Testable success criteria at A, AA, AAA conformance levels
    • Technology-agnostic design applies to all web content and platforms
    • Backward-compatible additive updates preserve policy and tool continuity
    • Strict conformance requires full pages, complete processes, non-interference
    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100D: Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, Defense

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Configuration management for product integrity
    • Product safety planning across lifecycle
    • Counterfeit parts prevention controls
    • Operational risk management in processes
    • Enhanced supplier evaluation and controls

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WCAG Details

    What It Is

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 is a W3C recommendation and global technical standard for web accessibility. It provides technology-agnostic, testable requirements to make web content perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for people with disabilities. Its layered approach uses principles, guidelines, and success criteria for flexible conformance.

    Key Components

    • **POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust as foundational framework.
    • 13 guidelines under POUR with ~80 success criteria at A, AA, AAA levels.
    • Informative techniques, failures, and understanding documents support implementation.
    • Conformance model requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives legal compliance (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549), reduces litigation risk, expands market reach. Enhances UX, SEO, conversion rates; builds stakeholder trust via inclusive design.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased program: policy setting, audits, design systems, CI/CD tools, training, monitoring. Applies to all organizations with web content; no certification but VPAT/ACR for procurement. Involves automated/manual testing, user validation.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation, space, and defense organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a process-based, risk-oriented approach to ensure product safety and supply chain integrity.

    Key Components

    • 10-clause Annex SL structure covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
    • Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risk (8.1.1).
    • Built on PDCA cycle; requires certification via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for many OEM contracts; enhances market access via OASIS database.
    • Reduces defects, improves delivery, mitigates safety risks.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, lowers costs, boosts competitiveness in high-stakes industries.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-18 months).
    • Applies to all sizes in ASD; involves documentation, risk tools (FMEA), supplier controls.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WCAG
    Web content accessibility for disabilities
    AS9100
    Aerospace quality management and safety

    Industry

    WCAG
    All web content worldwide, all sectors
    AS9100
    Aviation, space, defense organizations

    Nature

    WCAG
    Voluntary W3C guidelines, policy benchmark
    AS9100
    Certification standard extending ISO 9001

    Testing

    WCAG
    Automated/manual, assistive tech, user testing
    AS9100
    Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance, recertification

    Penalties

    WCAG
    Litigation risk, no formal penalties
    AS9100
    Certification loss, contract disqualification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WCAG and AS9100

    WCAG FAQ

    AS9100 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages