Standards Comparison

    WCAG

    Voluntary
    2023

    Global standard for accessible web content for disabilities

    VS

    HITRUST CSF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

    Quick Verdict

    WCAG ensures web accessibility for disabled users via testable criteria, adopted globally for compliance and UX. HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable security for regulated sectors like healthcare, harmonizing 60+ standards for assurance and risk management.

    Web Accessibility

    WCAG

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • POUR principles organize accessibility into perceivable, operable, understandable, robust
    • Testable success criteria at conformance levels A, AA, AAA
    • Technology-agnostic requirements with stable normative core
    • Backward-compatible additive updates preserve policy continuity
    • Conformance mandates full pages, complete processes, non-interference
    Information Security

    HITRUST CSF

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes 60+ frameworks for assess once, report many
    • Risk-based tailoring with organizational/system factors
    • Maturity model scoring across five levels
    • Certifiable via centralized HITRUST QA and assessors
    • MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence, remediation

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WCAG Details

    What It Is

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 is a W3C recommendation, technology-agnostic framework for making web content accessible to people with disabilities. Its primary purpose is to provide testable success criteria covering visual, auditory, motor, cognitive needs. Key approach: layered model separating stable normative requirements from evolvable techniques.

    Key Components

    • **POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.
    • 13 guidelines, ~80 success criteria at levels A, AA, AAA.
    • Informative techniques, failures, understanding docs.
    • Conformance model requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Reduces legal risks (ADA, Section 508, EAA); enables procurement; improves UX, conversion, SEO. Builds stakeholder trust, expands market to 1B+ disabled users, avoids litigation costs.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: policy, assessment, remediation via design systems, CI/CD tools, training. Applies to all web-publishing orgs globally; no certification but VPAT/ACR for claims, audits recommended.

    HITRUST CSF Details

    What It Is

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework consolidating requirements from 60+ regulations and standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It employs a risk-based approach with structured tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors.

    Key Components

    • 19 assessment domains (e.g., Access Control, Risk Management, Incident Management)
    • Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications
    • Five-level maturity model (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed)
    • Tiered certifications: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year)

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Harmonizes compliance for "assess once, report many"
    • Provides credible third-party assurance via validated reports
    • Reduces breach risk (99.4% breach-free certified environments)
    • Enables market access in healthcare/finance; lowers insurance premiums

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment via MyCSF platform
    • Involves policies, evidence collection, assessor testing
    • Suited for regulated industries; any size with tailoring
    • Requires Authorized External Assessors for certification (180 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WCAG
    Web content accessibility for disabilities
    HITRUST CSF
    Security/privacy controls across 19 domains

    Industry

    WCAG
    All industries, global web content
    HITRUST CSF
    Healthcare primary, regulated sectors

    Nature

    WCAG
    Voluntary W3C guidelines, conformance claims
    HITRUST CSF
    Certifiable framework with assessments

    Testing

    WCAG
    Automated/manual, user testing, no certification
    HITRUST CSF
    Validated assessments by external assessors

    Penalties

    WCAG
    Litigation risk, no direct penalties
    HITRUST CSF
    Certification loss, contract/reputation impact

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WCAG and HITRUST CSF

    WCAG FAQ

    HITRUST CSF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages