What is the primary objective of **WCAG**?

**The primary objective of WCAG is to provide a technology-agnostic standard for making web content accessible to people with disabilities through testable success criteria organized under the POUR principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust.** WCAG, developed by the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative, structures 13 guidelines and success criteria at Levels A, AA, and AAA to ensure content meets diverse needs across visual, auditory, motor, cognitive, and other impairments while improving usability for all users.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **WCAG**?

**WCAG compliance is required for U.S. public-sector entities under DOJ Title II rules mandating WCAG 2.1 Level AA by 2026/2027 based on entity size, and is the de facto benchmark in ADA Title III litigation and Section 508 procurement.** Globally, EU entities face obligations via EN 301 549 and the European Accessibility Act (effective June 28, 2025); enterprises in healthcare, finance, e-commerce, and education adopt WCAG 2.1 AA for regulatory alignment, vendor contracts, and risk mitigation.

Does **WCAG** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**WCAG does not require external audits or third-party certification, as conformance is self-assessed against normative success criteria.** Organizations may pursue optional independent audits for VPAT/ACR reports in procurement, but W3C emphasizes internal validation via full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported technologies, and non-interference—using layered testing (automated, manual, AT, user).

How often should an assessment for **WCAG** be performed?

**WCAG assessments should be performed continuously via CI/CD integration, with quarterly manual audits and annual full evaluations to detect regressions.** W3C recommends ongoing monitoring for new content, releases, and technology changes, prioritizing high-impact processes like checkout flows alongside automated scans and assistive technology testing.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **WCAG**?

**Non-compliance with WCAG exposes organizations to ADA litigation (thousands of cases annually), settlements requiring remediation, fines up to €20k/day in EU under EAA, and contract disqualifications.** Courts reference WCAG as the benchmark; undemonstrated good-faith efforts amplify penalties, reputational damage, and operational costs exceeding proactive remediation budgets.

An **WCAG** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, WCAG success criteria are explicitly designed for mapping to frameworks like EN 301 549, which harmonizes with WCAG for EU obligations.** Its technology-agnostic, testable structure supports alignment in procurement and policy without version conflicts due to backward compatibility (e.g., WCAG 2.1 extends 2.0).

What is the first step to begin implementing **WCAG**?

**The first step to implement WCAG is to conduct a Preliminary Review: inventory digital assets, prioritize high-traffic/complete processes, and baseline conformance via automated scans and manual checks against success criteria up to Level AA.** This informs policy, remediation roadmap, and governance per W3C guidance.

What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with Security (CC1-CC9) mandatory. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, enabling SaaS and cloud providers to demonstrate robust risk mitigation.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations are professionally compelled by enterprise customer mandates.** It targets SaaS, cloud, fintech, and data processors storing or transmitting customer data, especially those pursuing deals with ACV $5K+. Enterprises embed SOC 2 in RFPs and MSAs, disqualifying non-compliant vendors during VRM.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm, resulting in an attestation report rather than certification.** Type 1 validates control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over 3-12 months via sampling, walkthroughs, and evidence review, producing sections like auditor opinion, management assertion, and test results.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture full control cycles, with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months.** The monitoring period is typically 3-12 months minimum, followed by audit fieldwork; recertification uses bridged periods (prior 9 months + new 3 months) for continuous assurance without full re-audits.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with SOC 2 results in lost enterprise deals, extended sales cycles by 3-6 months, and heightened breach liability, though no direct AICPA fines apply.** Vendors face RFP disqualification, custom audits, CAC increases of 20-50%, and reputational damage; in breaches, absent controls amplify damages under SLAs or laws like CCPA, exceeding $1M per incident.

An **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 controls map extensively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A (114 controls) and NIST Govern/Detect functions, enabling multi-framework efficiency; Security TSC reuses across GDPR privacy and HIPAA requirements without dual certifications.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis to select Trust Services Criteria and map existing controls to TSC.** Engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K), inventory assets/data flows, and prioritize Security (CC6.1-6.8); tools like Vanta automate mapping of 50-100 controls.

WCAG vs SOC 2 | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

WCAG

Voluntary

2023

Global standard for accessible web content

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for trust services criteria controls

Quick Verdict

WCAG ensures web accessibility for disabled users via testable criteria like POUR, adopted globally to meet legal/ethical mandates and improve UX. SOC 2 attests service organizations' data security controls, pursued voluntarily to win enterprise trust, shorten sales cycles, and reduce breach risks.

Web Accessibility

WCAG

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Four POUR principles structure accessibility requirements
Testable success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels
Technology-agnostic guidelines for all web content
Backward-compatible additive version updates
Normative criteria separated from informative techniques

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
Type 2 audits operational effectiveness over time
AICPA CPA independent attestation reports
Flexible scoping for service organizations
Automation tools for evidence collection

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

WCAG Details

What It Is

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 is the W3C's technology-agnostic framework for making web content accessible to people with disabilities. Its primary purpose is to provide testable success criteria covering visual, auditory, motor, cognitive, and other needs, applicable to websites, apps, and digital documents.

Key Components

**Four POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.
13 guidelines under POUR, with ~90 success criteria at Levels A, AA, AAA.
Informative techniques, understanding docs, and Quick Reference.
Conformance requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets legal benchmarks (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA); reduces litigation risk; expands market reach; improves UX/SEO; enables procurement wins.

Implementation Overview

Phased: policy, assessment, remediation, training, CI/CD integration, audits. Applies enterprise-wide; AA most common target; no formal certification but VPAT/ACR reports and audits recommended.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework by the AICPA evaluating service organizations' commitments to Trust Services Criteria (TSC). It assesses controls for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy using a risk-based, control-oriented methodology focused on design and operating effectiveness.

Key Components

Five **TSCSecurity (mandatory, CC1-CC9), Availability (A1), Confidentiality (C1), Processing Integrity (PI1), Privacy (P1-P11)
50-100 controls per scope, built on COSO principles
Type 1 (point-in-time design) and Type 2 (effectiveness over 3-12 months) CPA-attested reports

Why Organizations Use It

Drives enterprise sales by streamlining due diligence and boosting close rates 15-30%
Mitigates breach risks, liabilities, and reputational damage
Builds trust moat for SaaS/cloud providers; market-driven, not legally mandated
Enables partnerships, M&A readiness, and multi-framework overlap (ISO 27001, NIST)

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping/gap analysis (4-8 weeks), remediation/evidence (8-24 weeks), monitoring/audit (3-12 months)
Suits service orgs (SaaS, fintech) all sizes; automation (Vanta) cuts effort 70%
Annual Type 2 recertification via CPAs

Key Differences

Aspect	WCAG	SOC 2
Scope	Web content accessibility for disabilities	Data security and trust services criteria
Industry	All web-publishing organizations globally	Service organizations handling customer data
Nature	Voluntary W3C technical guidelines	Voluntary AICPA audit attestation framework
Testing	Automated/manual/user testing, no certification	CPA audits Type 1/2, annual recertification
Penalties	Litigation risk, no direct penalties	No penalties, lost business/deal blocks

Scope

WCAG

Web content accessibility for disabilities

SOC 2

Data security and trust services criteria

Industry

WCAG

All web-publishing organizations globally

SOC 2

Service organizations handling customer data

Nature

WCAG

Voluntary W3C technical guidelines

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA audit attestation framework

Testing

WCAG

Automated/manual/user testing, no certification

SOC 2

CPA audits Type 1/2, annual recertification

Penalties

WCAG

Litigation risk, no direct penalties

SOC 2

No penalties, lost business/deal blocks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about WCAG and SOC 2

WCAG FAQ

SOC 2 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!

Discover why NIST CSF 2.0 is a life-saver for organizations. This flexible framework's 6 functions—Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—boost res

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

SOC 2 vs ISO 56002

Compare SOC 2 vs ISO 56002: SOC 2 secures data via Trust Criteria; ISO 56002 drives innovation systems. Uncover differences, compliance paths & ROI to elevate trust & growth. Read now!

HITRUST CSF vs ISO 41001

Compare HITRUST CSF vs ISO 41001: Cybersecurity assurance powerhouse meets facility mgmt system. Key diffs, mappings & implementation guide for compliance wins. Choose wisely!

ISO 27001 vs RoHS

ISO 27001 vs RoHS: Compare ISO 27001's risk-based ISMS for data security mastery with RoHS restrictions on hazardous substances in electronics. Achieve compliance, resilience—explore key differences now!

WCAG

SOC 2

Quick Verdict

WCAG

Key Features

SOC 2

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

WCAG Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

WCAG FAQ

What is the primary objective of WCAG?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with WCAG?

Does WCAG require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for WCAG be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with WCAG?

An WCAG be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing WCAG?

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

An SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

SOC 2 vs ISO 56002

HITRUST CSF vs ISO 41001

ISO 27001 vs RoHS