WCAG
Global standard for accessible web content design
WELL
Performance-based certification for occupant health and wellness
Quick Verdict
WCAG ensures web accessibility for people with disabilities through testable success criteria, while WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via performance verification. Companies adopt WCAG for legal compliance and UX; WELL for productivity, ESG, and talent retention.
WCAG
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2
Key Features
- Four POUR principles structuring accessibility requirements
- Testable success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels
- Technology-agnostic guidelines for all web content
- Backward-compatible additive version updates
- Normative criteria separated from informative techniques
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- 10 core concepts for health outcomes
- Mandatory preconditions and point-based optimizations
- On-site performance verification testing
- Certification tiers Bronze to Platinum
- Continuous monitoring compliance pathways
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WCAG Details
What It Is
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 is the W3C's technology-agnostic framework for making web content accessible to people with disabilities. Its primary purpose is to provide testable success criteria under four **POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust, ensuring broad usability across devices and assistive technologies.
Key Components
- 13 guidelines organized under POUR, with ~90 success criteria at Levels A, AA, AAA.
- Normative success criteria define conformance; informative techniques offer implementation guidance.
- Conformance model requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported technologies, non-interference.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets legal benchmarks (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA).
- Reduces litigation risk amid rising lawsuits.
- Improves UX, conversion rates, SEO, market reach.
- Builds stakeholder trust via inclusive design.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: policy setting, audits, design system integration, training, CI/CD tools, ongoing monitoring. Applies to all web-publishing organizations globally; no formal certification but VPAT/ACR reports common. Targets AA level for enterprise baseline.
WELL Details
What It Is
The WELL Building Standard v2, administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI), is a performance-based certification framework for designing, operating, and verifying buildings that advance human health and well-being. Its scope spans indoor environmental quality, operations, and policies across new and existing structures. It employs a preconditions-and-optimizations approach, mandating baseline health protections while rewarding enhancements through points.
Key Components
- **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
- 24 Preconditions (mandatory, pass/fail) and 102 Optimizations (point-earning).
- Built on evidence-based health science; certification tiers (Bronze 40pts, Silver 50pts, Gold 60pts, Platinum 80pts) with concept minimums.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives occupant productivity, retention, ESG reporting.
- Mitigates health risks, enhances reputation.
- Complements LEED for dual sustainability-health focus.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site verification, recertification every 3 years.
- Applies to offices, residential, portfolios; requires third-party testing.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WCAG | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Web content accessibility for disabilities | Building health, well-being, indoor environments |
| Industry | All digital/web industries worldwide | Real estate, facilities, corporate globally |
| Nature | Voluntary W3C technical standard | Voluntary IWBI performance certification |
| Testing | Automated/manual WCAG success criteria | On-site performance verification testing |
| Penalties | Litigation risk, no certification penalties | No legal penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WCAG and WELL
WCAG FAQ
WELL FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs LEED
CSL vs LEED: Compare China's Cybersecurity Law compliance vs LEED green building certification. Strategies, risks & implementation for MNCs mastering cyber & sustainability regs.
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs IFS Food
CSL vs IFS Food: China's Cybersecurity Law data rules vs global food safety standard. Master compliance risks, strategies, pillars & phased guides for MNCs. Comply smarter now!
PCI DSS vs ISO 19600
Discover PCI DSS vs ISO 19600: PCI's 12 strict payment security rules vs ISO's flexible CMS guidelines. Optimize compliance, cut risks—compare key diffs now!