What is the primary objective of **WEEE**?

**The primary objective of WEEE is to prevent the generation of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) and, in priority order, promote its preparation for re-use, recycling, and other recovery forms to minimize environmental and health impacts.** Established by Directive 2012/19/EU, it implements **Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)**, mandating separate collection at rates of **65%** of average EEE placed on the market (POM) over three prior years or **85%** of WEEE generated, alongside selective treatment per Annex II.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **WEEE**?

**Producers—defined as manufacturers, brand owners, importers, and distance sellers placing EEE on the EU market—are legally required to comply with WEEE.** This includes registration in each Member State's national register via the European WEEE Registers Network (EWRN), POM reporting per Commission Regulation 2017/699, and financing collection/treatment through collective **Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs)** or individual schemes. Distributors must provide free "one-for-one" take-back and accept very small WEEE (≤25 cm) if sales area ≥**400 m²**.

Does **WEEE** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**WEEE does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for producers.** Compliance relies on national enforcement, self-reported data in harmonized formats (Implementing Regulation 2019/290), and evidence retention for inspections. Treatment facilities require permits and adherence to Annex II depollution standards, with PROs and recyclers subject to regular operational audits.

How often should an assessment for **WEEE** be performed?

**WEEE assessments should be performed annually to align with mandatory POM reporting deadlines set by national registers.** Producers submit regular reports on EEE quantities by Annex III categories using standardized formats (Decision 2019/2193), with internal reviews recommended quarterly to verify data accuracy, category classification, and PRO performance against collection targets.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **WEEE**?

**Non-compliance with WEEE results in national penalties including financial fines, market access restrictions, and legal actions enforced by Member State authorities.** Breaches such as unreported POM, improper registration, or illegal WEEE shipments trigger audits, retroactive fees, and potential sales bans; specific fine schedules vary by country, with additional costs for inspections under Article 23.

An **WEEE** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**WEEE cannot be directly mapped to other international frameworks as it is a standalone EU Directive with country-specific transpositions.** Its EPR model, open-scope categories (Annex III from 15 August 2018), and targets are unique, though operational alignments may exist in EEA states; producers must comply via national laws without cross-standard equivalence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **WEEE**?

**The first step to implement WEEE is to register as a producer in each Member State where EEE is placed on the market, using national registers accessible via the EWRN.** Identify "producer" status (including non-EU distance sellers), classify products into six Annex III categories, and join a PRO or establish an individual scheme while compiling POM data for initial reporting.

What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources by translating stakeholder needs into actionable governance and management objectives.** COBIT 2019 defines a core model of **40 governance and management objectives** across five domains (**EDM**, **APO**, **BAI**, **DSS**, **MEA**), supported by **six governance system principles** and **seven components** (processes, structures, policies, information, culture, skills, infrastructure). It uses a **goals cascade** linking **13 enterprise goals** to **13 alignment goals** for tailored EGIT.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework maintained by ISACA, not a regulation.** Professionally, it is adopted by enterprises relying on I&T for value creation, particularly in regulated sectors like finance and utilities, where boards and executives use it for EGIT to meet internal controls, audit, and stakeholder expectations via **design factors** like risk profile and compliance requirements.

Oes **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it is a framework, not a certifiable standard.** Organizations may conduct internal **capability assessments** using the **CMMI-based performance management model** (levels 0-5) or **MEA04 Managed Assurance**. ISACA offers individual certificates (**COBIT 2019 Foundation**, **Design & Implementation**), but enterprise assurance relies on self-assessments, internal audits, or aligned external reviews.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed annually or upon significant changes in design factors, using the CMMI-aligned performance management scheme (levels 0-5).** The **MEA domain** drives ongoing monitoring, with capability appraisals for prioritized objectives tied to the **goals cascade**. ISACA recommends baseline assessments pre-implementation, then periodic reviews (e.g., quarterly for high-risk processes) to track improvements and adapt via the **governance system design workflow**.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**Non-compliance with COBIT carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a voluntary framework.** Indirect consequences include heightened enterprise risk, audit deficiencies, regulatory exposure (e.g., unaddressed I&T controls), and failure to demonstrate EGIT maturity to stakeholders. Weak **MEA** practices may lead to unoptimized resources, value shortfalls, or incidents, undermining board oversight per **EDM** principles.

An **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other international frameworks via its governance framework principles emphasizing alignment.** **Design factors** and the **core model** enable interoperability, with published ISACA resources providing crosswalks for standards, allowing COBIT to serve as an umbrella for tailored governance systems.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate enterprise context using design factors and conduct a current-state capability assessment.** Per **APO02 Managed Strategy**, understand stakeholder needs via the **goals cascade**, assess digital maturity (levels 0-5), and apply the **11 design factors** (e.g., strategy, risk profile) with ISACA's toolkit to define initial scope and roadmap.

WEEE vs COBIT | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

WEEE

Mandatory

2012

EU directive for waste electrical and electronic equipment management

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Framework for enterprise IT governance and management

Quick Verdict

WEEE mandates EU-wide e-waste management with producer responsibility, while COBIT is a voluntary framework for IT governance. Producers adopt WEEE for legal compliance; executives use COBIT to align IT with business strategy and manage risks effectively.

Waste Management

WEEE

Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandates Extended Producer Responsibility for EEE end-of-life
Open scope covers all electrical equipment since 2018
65% EEE placed-on-market or 85% generated collection targets
Requires selective depollution and Annex II treatment standards
Enforces national producer registration and harmonized reporting

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 (Control Objectives for Information Technologies)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
11 design factors for tailored governance systems
CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
Goals cascade aligning stakeholder needs to IT
Separation of governance from management responsibilities

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

WEEE Details

What It Is

Directive 2012/19/EU, the recast WEEE Directive, is a binding EU regulation establishing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for managing waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). It covers all EEE under open scope since 2018, prioritizing waste prevention, reuse, recycling, and recovery while minimizing environmental/health risks. Its EPR-based approach shifts end-of-life costs to producers via national transposition.

Key Components

Six open-scope categories in Annex III for EEE classification.
**Collection targets65% of average EEE placed on market (POM) or 85% of WEEE generated.
**Treatment standardsSelective depollution (Annex II), storage rules (Annex III).
**Producer obligationsRegistration, reporting, financing via PROs or individual schemes.
Compliance enforced nationally with harmonized formats (e.g., Regulations 2017/699, 2019/290).

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated for EU market access, it ensures legal compliance, reduces risks from illegal exports/penalties, recovers critical materials, and supports Green Deal goals. Benefits include supply security, cost recovery, and circular economy differentiation.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, multi-country registration, PRO joining, POM tracking, reverse logistics. Applies to producers/importers selling EEE in EU/EEA; no central certification but national audits/reporting required. Suits all sizes via collective schemes.

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019, developed by ISACA, is a comprehensive framework for enterprise governance and management of information and technology (EGIT). Its primary purpose is to help organizations create value from IT, manage risks, and optimize resources by translating stakeholder needs into actionable objectives via a tailored governance system and design workflow.

Key Components

40 governance and management objectives grouped into 5 domains: EDM (governance), APO (strategy), BAI (delivery), DSS (operations), MEA (assurance).
6 governance system principles and 11 design factors for customization.
7 components (e.g., processes, structures, culture, skills).
CMMI-based performance management with capability levels 0-5; no formal organizational certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns IT strategy with business goals through goals cascade.
Enhances compliance (e.g., SOX, GDPR) and audit readiness via MEA04.
Improves risk optimization and resource efficiency.
Builds board-level oversight and stakeholder trust for digital transformation.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: assess maturity, design via toolkit, pilot objectives, measure capabilities, continuous improvement.
Applicable to medium-large enterprises across industries; emphasizes training (Foundation, Design & Implementation certs).

Key Differences

Aspect	WEEE	COBIT
Scope	End-of-life management of electrical/electronic equipment	Enterprise IT governance and management objectives
Industry	All sectors placing EEE on EU markets	All industries with enterprise IT reliance
Nature	Binding EU directive via national transposition	Voluntary governance framework by ISACA
Testing	National audits of collection/recovery rates	Capability maturity assessments (0-5 levels)
Penalties	National fines, market restrictions	No legal penalties, certification loss

Scope

WEEE

End-of-life management of electrical/electronic equipment

COBIT

Enterprise IT governance and management objectives

Industry

WEEE

All sectors placing EEE on EU markets

COBIT

All industries with enterprise IT reliance

Nature

WEEE

Binding EU directive via national transposition

COBIT

Voluntary governance framework by ISACA

Testing

WEEE

National audits of collection/recovery rates

COBIT

Capability maturity assessments (0-5 levels)

Penalties

WEEE

National fines, market restrictions

COBIT

No legal penalties, certification loss

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about WEEE and COBIT

WEEE FAQ

COBIT FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples

Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs

Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

WELL vs GLBA

Explore WELL vs GLBA: Health-centric building certification meets financial privacy safeguards. Key differences, compliance tips & strategies for optimal wellness + data security. Dive in now!

AEO vs ISO 28000

Compare AEO vs ISO 28000: Discover key differences in supply chain security. AEO speeds customs clearance; ISO 28000 builds resilient management systems. Optimize compliance now.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs Six Sigma

CSL vs Six Sigma: Compare China's Cybersecurity Law with Six Sigma strategies for compliance mastery, risk mitigation, and turning regulations into strategic advantages now!

WEEE

COBIT

Quick Verdict

WEEE

Key Features

COBIT

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

WEEE Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

WEEE FAQ

What is the primary objective of WEEE?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with WEEE?

Does WEEE require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for WEEE be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with WEEE?

An WEEE be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing WEEE?

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Oes COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

An COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

WELL vs GLBA

AEO vs ISO 28000

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs Six Sigma