WELL
Certification for occupant health in buildings
Basel III
Global framework for bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards
Quick Verdict
WELL certifies healthy buildings via performance testing for occupant well-being, while Basel III mandates capital/liquidity rules for banks' financial stability. Organizations adopt WELL for ESG/tenant appeal; Basel III for regulatory compliance and crisis resilience.
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- Mandatory on-site performance verification testing
- 10 core concepts with Preconditions and Optimizations
- Point-based tiers from Bronze to Platinum
- People-first health and well-being outcomes
- Continuous monitoring compliance pathways
Basel III
Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Key Features
- CET1 minimum 4.5% plus conservation buffer
- Non-risk-based leverage ratio minimum 3%
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for structural resilience
- Output floor limits internal model benefits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
WELL Details
What It Is
WELL Building Standard v2 is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its approach combines mandatory Preconditions (pass/fail) with optional Optimizations (points-based) across 10 core concepts like Air, Water, and Mind.
Key Components
- **10 conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (+ Innovation).
- 24 Preconditions and 102 Optimizations.
- Built on public health research and building science.
- Certification model: Bronze (40 points), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80), with concept minimums at higher tiers.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances occupant health, productivity, and ESG reporting.
- Differentiates assets via verified performance.
- Mitigates risks like poor IEQ; boosts rents and retention.
- Builds stakeholder trust through third-party verification.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site testing, recertification every 3 years.
- Applies to new/existing buildings, various types.
- Requires cross-functional teams, continuous monitoring.
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the global regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-2007-2009 financial crisis. It comprises prudential standards for banks to address capital, leverage, and liquidity weaknesses. Primary purpose: enhance bank resilience through higher-quality capital, leverage constraints, and liquidity buffers. Key approach: multi-metric 'belts and suspenders' combining risk-weighted assets (RWA) with non-risk-based measures.
Key Components
- **Three PillarsPillar 1 (capital ratios: CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, Total 8% + buffers), Pillar 2 (supervisory review/ICAAP), Pillar 3 (disclosures).
- Buffers: 2.5% conservation, countercyclical (up to 2.5%), G-SIB/D-SIB surcharges.
- Leverage ratio ≥3%; LCR ≥100%; NSFR ≥100%.
- Built on revised RWA methods, output floor (72.5%). Compliance via national implementation, no global certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for internationally active banks via jurisdictional laws; mitigates systemic risk, improves comparability. Benefits: stronger funding costs, resilience in stress, strategic asset allocation. Builds investor/supervisor trust, reduces model risk.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise transformation: diagnostics, data/system upgrades, governance/PMO, parallel testing. Targets large banks globally; involves QIS, training, supervisory engagement. Ongoing via RCAP assessments.
Key Differences
| Aspect | WELL | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Occupant health across 10 concepts (air, water, mind) | Bank capital, leverage, liquidity resilience |
| Industry | Buildings across all sectors globally | Banking and financial institutions |
| Nature | Voluntary performance certification | Mandatory prudential regulation |
| Testing | On-site performance verification annually | Continuous supervisory review, stress tests |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal fines | Fines, asset caps, business restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about WELL and Basel III
WELL FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Uncovered: 2025 Podcast Deep Dive into Control Family Impact on $10M+ Breach Aversions
Uncover NIST 800-53 ROI in healthcare & finance: RA, SI, IR controls break even after 1-2 incidents ($100K-$10M savings). Podcast deep dive with CISO metrics fo

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 45001 vs WEEE
Discover ISO 45001 vs WEEE: Compare OH&S management standard with EU e-waste directive. Key differences, compliance strategies, and IMS integration for safer, sustainable ops. Act now!
Six Sigma vs ISO 14001
Discover Six Sigma vs ISO 14001: data-driven process excellence meets environmental management. Compare methodologies, unlock integration for compliance & gains. Read now!
PRINCE2 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
PRINCE2 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Project governance powerhouse meets AI risk framework. Compare 7 principles/practices vs PDCA controls, compliance & tailoring. Choose wisely now!