AS9100 vs ISO 27017
AS9100
Aerospace quality management system extending ISO 9001
ISO 27017
International code of practice for cloud security controls
Quick Verdict
AS9100 delivers aerospace quality management with safety and configuration controls for aviation suppliers, while ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific security guidance extending ISO 27001. Organizations adopt AS9100 for OEM contracts; ISO 27017 for cloud risk assurance.
AS9100
AS9100D:2016 Quality Management Systems - Requirements
Key Features
- Configuration management ensuring product integrity (8.1.2)
- Product safety controls across lifecycle (8.1.3)
- Counterfeit parts prevention processes (8.1.4)
- Operational risk management in operations (8.1.1)
- Enhanced supplier controls and traceability (8.4)
ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud controls
Key Features
- Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
- Adds 7 cloud-specific controls for multi-tenancy risks
- Provides guidance on 37 ISO 27002 controls for cloud
- Addresses VM hardening and segregation in virtual environments
- Enables customer monitoring of cloud service activities
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
AS9100 Details
What It Is
AS9100D:2016 is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements. Primary purpose: ensure product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability in high-risk sectors. Employs a risk-based, process-oriented approach across 10 clauses aligned with Annex SL structure.
Key Components
- Core pillars: operational planning (Clause 8), risk management (Clauses 6, 8.1), support resources (Clause 7).
- Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), human factors.
- Built on PDCA cycle; requires documented processes, KPIs, audits.
- Certification via accredited third-party audits: Stage 1/2, annual surveillance, triennial recertification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Contractual mandates from OEMs for market access.
- Reduces defects, improves delivery, lowers costs.
- Mitigates safety risks, enhances traceability.
- Builds stakeholder trust via OASIS database visibility.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification.
- Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, MRO; all sizes.
- 6-18 months typical; evidence-driven audits essential.
ISO 27017 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific guidance. It provides implementation advice for information security controls in cloud services, focusing on public, private, and hybrid models across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS. Its risk-based approach integrates into ISO 27001 ISMS, clarifying shared responsibilities between cloud service providers (CSPs) and customers (CSCs).
Key Components
- Guidance on 37 ISO 27002 controls adapted for cloud.
- 7 additional cloud-specific CLD controls (e.g., segregation, VM hardening, asset removal).
- Domains mirror 27002: access control, operations, supplier relationships.
- Assessed within ISO 27001 certification, no standalone cert.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances cloud risk management, meets procurement demands, supports GDPR/CCPA alignment. Builds trust, differentiates CSPs, reduces incidents from misconfigurations.
Implementation Overview
Integrate into existing ISO 27001 ISMS via risk assessment, control mapping. Key steps: define responsibilities, configure logging/monitoring, audit cloud setups. Suits CSPs/CSCs globally; joint audits take 9-12 months.
Key Differences
| Aspect | AS9100 | ISO 27017 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls | Cloud-specific info sec controls extending ISO 27002 |
| Industry | Aviation, space, defense organizations globally | Cloud service providers and customers worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary QMS certification standard | Guidance code of practice, not standalone certifiable |
| Testing | Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, 3-year recert | Assessed within ISO 27001 audits by cert bodies |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market access denial | No direct penalties, impacts ISO 27001 conformity |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about AS9100 and ISO 27017
AS9100 FAQ
ISO 27017 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs
Master SOC 2 Type 2 audits with our guide: 10 red flags like incomplete logs/vendor gaps, model walkthrough answers, psychology tips. Pass first-time with <5% e
Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how AS9100 and ISO 27017 compare against other standards