AS9100
International standard for aerospace quality management systems
ISO 27701
International standard for privacy information management systems
Quick Verdict
AS9100 ensures aerospace quality with safety and configuration controls for aviation suppliers, while ISO 27701 establishes privacy management for PII handling across sectors. Organizations adopt AS9100 for OEM contracts and ISO 27701 for regulatory compliance and trust.
AS9100
AS9100D:2016 Aerospace Quality Management Systems
Key Features
- Explicit product safety controls across lifecycle
- Configuration management for design integrity
- Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
- Operational risk management in production
- Enhanced supplier approval and monitoring
ISO 27701
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy Information Management
Key Features
- Establishes Privacy Information Management System (PIMS)
- Controller and processor-specific privacy controls
- Risk-based assessments and DPIAs required
- Mappings to GDPR and ISO 27001
- PDCA cycle for continual improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
AS9100 Details
What It Is
AS9100D:2016 is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a risk-based, process-oriented approach to ensure product safety and supply chain integrity.
Key Components
- 10-clause Annex SL structure covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1).
- Enhanced supplier controls, human factors, and traceability.
- Certification via accredited third-party audits with surveillance cycles.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets OEM contractual mandates for market access.
- Reduces defects, improves delivery, lowers costs via risk mitigation.
- Builds stakeholder trust through OASIS visibility and safety assurance.
- Drives competitive edge in high-reliability sectors.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification.
- Applies to all sizes in ASD; 6-18 months typical.
- Requires documented evidence, leadership commitment, continual improvement.
ISO 27701 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is the international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It provides a risk-based framework for managing personally identifiable information (PII) lifecycle, extending ISO/IEC 27001:2022 with privacy-specific requirements for PII controllers and processors.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10 mirror management system structure: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Annex A (controllers): consent, data subject rights, DPIAs, retention.
- Annex B (processors): contracts, sub-processors, assistance obligations.
- Built on PDCA cycle; GDPR mappings in annexes; certification via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates accountability for global privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA).
- Mitigates regulatory fines, breach risks; enhances vendor trust.
- Competitive edge in procurement; operational efficiency via unified compliance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: discover/scope, design/plan, implement/operate, validate/improve.
- Involves PII inventory, gap analysis, training, audits.
- Suits all sizes/industries handling PII; 3-year certification with surveillance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | AS9100 | ISO 27701 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls | Privacy Information Management System for PII lifecycle |
| Industry | Aviation, space, defense organizations globally | Any sector handling PII worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary certification standard extending ISO 9001 | Voluntary PIMS standard extending ISO 27001 |
| Testing | Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recert every 3 years | Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recert every 3 years |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market access denial | Loss of certification, regulatory non-compliance risk |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about AS9100 and ISO 27701
AS9100 FAQ
ISO 27701 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
The SOC Maturity Roadmap: A 5-Step Blueprint for Scaling from Ad-Hoc to Optimized Operations
Unlock SOC excellence with our 5-step maturity roadmap. Compare SOC-CMM, NIST CSF, and CMMC frameworks to scale from ad-hoc to automated operations. Start your
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ITIL vs NIST 800-53
Compare ITIL vs NIST 800-53: ITIL masters ITSM with 34 practices & SVS, NIST excels in 20 security/privacy control families. Uncover diffs, benefits & choose wisely for resilient IT.
ISO 22000 vs ISO 14064
Compare ISO 22000 vs ISO 14064: Food safety FSMS with HACCP meets GHG inventories & verification. Uncover HLS/PDCA diffs, scopes & integration for compliance. Dive in now!
ISO 14001 vs WELL
ISO 14001 vs WELL: Compare EMS excellence for eco-compliance vs building health standards. Uncover differences, integration tips, benefits & certification paths for sustainable success. Dive in!