Basel III
Global framework for bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC regulation for cybersecurity disclosures and governance.
Quick Verdict
Basel III strengthens bank capital, leverage, and liquidity globally, while U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules mandate rapid incident disclosures and governance transparency for public firms. Banks adopt Basel for prudential resilience; issuers comply with SEC for investor protection.
Basel III
Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Key Features
- Elevates CET1 minimum to 4.5% of RWA
- Introduces 3% non-risk-based leverage ratio
- Mandates 100% Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
- Implements 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer
- Establishes 100% Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day material incident disclosure on Form 8-K
- Annual risk management and governance in Regulation S-K Item 106
- Inline XBRL tagging for machine-readable disclosures
- Board oversight and management expertise requirements
- Third-party cybersecurity risk oversight processes
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the international regulatory framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-global financial crisis to enhance bank prudential standards. It focuses on improving the quantity and quality of capital, constraining leverage, and bolstering liquidity resilience. The framework employs a multi-metric "belts and suspenders" approach combining risk-weighted assets (RWA) with non-risk-based measures.
Key Components
- **Pillar 1Minimum capital ratios (CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, Total 8%), plus buffers (2.5% conservation, countercyclical, G-SIB/D-SIB); leverage ratio 3%; LCR 100%, NSFR 100%.
- **Pillar 2Supervisory review via ICAAP and stress testing.
- **Pillar 3Standardized disclosures for RWA comparability. No formal certification; relies on national supervisory compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks adopt Basel III for mandatory resilience against shocks, reduced model risk, and improved transparency. It mitigates systemic risks, enhances market discipline, and supports strategic balance-sheet management amid jurisdictional implementations.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data/system upgrades, governance setup. Targets internationally active banks globally via domestic laws; involves parallel runs, model validation, Pillar 3 reporting. Ongoing supervisory assessments required.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) are federal regulations mandating standardized disclosures for public companies. They focus on timely reporting of material cybersecurity incidents and periodic updates on risk management, strategy, and governance. The approach is materiality-based, aligned with securities law principles.
Key Components
- **Incident disclosureForm 8-K Item 1.05 requires reporting material incidents within four business days.
- **Annual disclosuresRegulation S-K Item 106 covers processes, impacts, board oversight, and management roles.
- Inline XBRL tagging for comparability.
- Built on existing securities materiality (TSC Industries test); no fixed controls. Compliance via filings, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances investor protection, reduces asymmetry, improves market efficiency. Mandatory for Exchange Act registrants; avoids enforcement like Yahoo penalties. Builds resilience, investor trust; integrates cyber into ERM.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, disclosure playbook, cross-functional committees, vendor updates, training. Applies to all public companies (domestic/FPIs); staggered dates (Dec 2023+). No external audit, but SEC reviews filings.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Basel III | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards | Cyber incident disclosure, governance |
| Industry | Global banking sector | U.S. public companies all sectors |
| Nature | Global prudential standards, national implementation | Mandatory SEC disclosure regulation |
| Testing | Pillar 2 supervisory stress tests, ICAAP | Materiality assessments, disclosure controls |
| Penalties | National supervisory enforcement, capital restrictions | SEC fines, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Basel III and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Basel III FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T
CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre
One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CCPA vs UAE PDPL
Discover CCPA vs UAE PDPL: Key differences in consumer rights, obligations, fines & enforcement. Expert strategies for seamless compliance across CA & UAE. Boost privacy resilience now!
COPPA vs HITRUST CSF
Compare COPPA vs HITRUST CSF: Kids' privacy law meets certifiable security standards. Avoid $170M fines, master compliance gaps. Secure your data now!
NIS2 vs SOX
NIS2 vs SOX: EU cyber directive expands to essential entities with 2% turnover fines vs US SOX's ICFR audits & exec certifications. Compare scopes—boost compliance now!