BRC
Global standard for food safety management systems
CMMI
Global framework for process maturity and improvement
Quick Verdict
BRC ensures food safety via HACCP and audits for manufacturers seeking retailer access, while CMMI builds process maturity through practice areas and appraisals for software/services firms aiming for predictable delivery and quality.
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9
Key Features
- GFSI-benchmarked certification for food manufacturers worldwide
- Senior management commitment and food safety culture plan
- Codex HACCP with integrated prerequisite programs
- Fundamental requirements ensuring traceability and allergens
- Risk-based environmental monitoring and high-care zoning
CMMI
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
Key Features
- Maturity Levels 0-5 for organizational progression
- 25 Practice Areas across 4 Category Areas
- Staged and continuous representations
- SCAMPI appraisals for benchmarking
- Generic practices for institutionalization
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a third-party certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior management commitment and a Codex HACCP-based food safety plan supported by prerequisite programs.
Key Components
- Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP, FSQMS, site standards, product/process control, personnel, high-risk zoning, traded products.
- Fundamental requirements (e.g., internal audits, traceability, allergen management) that are non-negotiable.
- Built on GFSI-benchmarked protocols with grading (AA/A/B/C/D).
- Certification via announced/unannounced audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Provides market access to retailers, reduces duplicative audits, demonstrates due diligence, mitigates recall risks (allergens, pathogens), builds trust. Strategic for supply chain compliance and operational resilience.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, HACCP development, training, internal audits, certification audit. Applies to manufacturers globally; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized sites, involving CAPEX for site upgrades and ongoing surveillance.
CMMI Details
What It Is
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) is a globally recognized process improvement framework for enhancing organizational performance in development, services, and acquisition. Its primary purpose is to institutionalize repeatable processes, making delivery predictable and measurable through maturity progression. CMMI employs a staged or continuous representation approach, focusing on practice areas and institutionalization.
Key Components
- 4 Category Areas (Doing, Managing, Enabling, Improving) with 12 Capability Areas and 25 Practice Areas in v2.0.
- Maturity Levels 0-5 (Incomplete to Optimizing) and Capability Levels 0-3 per area.
- Generic Practices for institutionalization (policy, planning, monitoring) and Specific Practices per area.
- SCAMPI appraisals (Classes A/B/C) for certification and benchmarking.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives predictability, quality, and ROI (e.g., reduced rework, 4:1 ROI).
- Meets contractual requirements (DoD, regulated industries).
- Mitigates risks via measurement and causal analysis.
- Builds competitive edge and stakeholder trust through published ratings.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: assessment, piloting, rollout, appraisal.
- Involves gap analysis, training, tooling integration.
- Suits mid-to-large orgs in IT, software, defense globally.
- Requires authorized SCAMPI A appraisal for official maturity rating.
Key Differences
| Aspect | BRC | CMMI |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Food safety manufacturing, HACCP, site standards | Process improvement across development, services, acquisition |
| Industry | Food, packaging, storage, global manufacturers | Software, IT, defense, services, multi-industry |
| Nature | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard | Voluntary process maturity improvement framework |
| Testing | Annual announced/unannounced third-party audits | SCAMPI A/B/C appraisals by certified lead appraisers |
| Penalties | Grade downgrade, certification loss, market exclusion | No formal penalties, lost contract eligibility |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about BRC and CMMI
BRC FAQ
CMMI FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre
NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates
Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FERPA vs NIST 800-171
Discover FERPA vs NIST 800-171: Compare student privacy rights, disclosures & exceptions in FERPA with CUI controls in NIST. Key compliance strategies for educators. Master both now!
PIPEDA vs ISO 22000
Discover PIPEDA vs ISO 22000 differences: Canada's privacy law (10 principles) vs global FSMS (HLS, PDCA). Master compliance strategies for food/privacy risks. Act now!
ISO 45001 vs PMBOK
ISO 45001 vs PMBOK: Compare OH&S leadership, PDCA cycles & risk controls with project governance. Unlock integration for safer, efficient delivery. Discover now!