BRC
GFSI-benchmarked standard for food safety manufacturing
ISO 27701
International standard for privacy information management systems
Quick Verdict
BRC ensures food safety via HACCP and audits for manufacturers seeking retailer access, while ISO 27701 certifies privacy management for PII handlers to prove GDPR compliance. Companies adopt BRC for supply chain trust; ISO 27701 for data accountability.
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety
Key Features
- GFSI-benchmarked certification for food manufacturers
- Nine core clauses with fundamental requirements
- Senior management commitment and HACCP plan
- Risk-based environmental monitoring and zoning
- Unannounced audits for higher performance grades
ISO 27701
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy Information Management
Key Features
- Establishes Privacy Information Management System (PIMS)
- Role-specific controls for controllers and processors
- Extends and aligns with ISO 27001 ISMS
- GDPR mappings and risk-based DPIAs
- Auditable certification with PDCA continual improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is a third-party certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured, auditable management system combining senior management commitment and Codex HACCP-based food safety plans with prerequisite programs.
Key Components
- Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
- Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management, internal audits) critical for certification.
- Built on GFSI-benchmarked protocols with grading (AA/A/B/C/D) via announced/unannounced audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Provides market access to retailers, reduces duplicative audits, demonstrates due diligence, mitigates recall risks from allergens/pathogens/labelling. Enhances resilience, supports FSMA compliance, builds stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, CAPA. Applies to manufacturers globally; 6-12 months typical, requires annual certification audits by accredited bodies.
ISO 27701 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is the international standard defining requirements for a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It extends ISO/IEC 27001 with privacy-specific guidance for managing personally identifiable information (PII) lifecycles, emphasizing accountability for PII controllers and processors via a risk-based, PDCA approach.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: Management system structure with privacy extensions.
- Annex A: 39 controls for PII controllers (e.g., consent, data subject rights).
- Annex B: 24 controls for PII processors (e.g., contracts, sub-processors).
- Mappings to GDPR (Annex D) and ISO standards.
- Built on continual improvement and demonstrable evidence.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives GDPR/other law compliance, reduces PII risks/breaches, enables certification for procurement trust, harmonizes multi-jurisdictional governance, and boosts reputation via auditable accountability.
Implementation Overview
Phased PDCA: scope/PII inventory, design controls/policies, implement/operate, audit/improve. Suits all sizes/industries handling PII. Certification requires accredited audits (Stage 1/2), 3-year cycle.
Key Differences
| Aspect | BRC | ISO 27701 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Food safety, quality, HACCP in manufacturing | Privacy management system for PII processing |
| Industry | Food manufacturing, packaging, distribution globally | All sectors handling personal data worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard | Voluntary privacy management certification standard |
| Testing | Annual announced/unannounced third-party audits | 3-year certification with annual surveillance audits |
| Penalties | Certification loss, market access denial | Certification loss, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about BRC and ISO 27701
BRC FAQ
ISO 27701 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs
Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i
Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CMMC vs ISO 45001
Explore CMMC vs ISO 45001: DoD cybersecurity maturity for CUI protection vs global OH&S standard. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & implementation roadmap. Dive in now!
PDPA vs ISO 22301
Discover PDPA vs ISO 22301: Compare Asia's data privacy laws (Singapore/Thailand) with global BCM standards. Enhance compliance, resilience & risk mgmt. Dive in now!
ISO 37301 vs COBIT
Compare ISO 37301 vs COBIT: Certifiable CMS for compliance leadership & risks meets IT governance framework. Integrate for audits, culture & excellence. Optimize now!