CCPA
California regulation granting residents rights over personal data
ISO 30301
International standard for records management systems
Quick Verdict
CCPA mandates consumer privacy rights for California businesses handling personal data, enforced by fines. ISO 30301 provides voluntary records management certification for any organization. Companies adopt CCPA for legal compliance, ISO 30301 for governance and auditability.
CCPA
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA)
Key Features
- Grants consumers rights to know, delete, opt-out of PI sales/sharing
- Threshold-based applicability: $25M revenue or 100K+ CA consumers/devices
- Requires notices at collection and 'Do Not Sell/Share' links
- Mandates honoring Global Privacy Control (GPC) opt-out signals
- Imposes fines up to $7,500 per violation plus breach lawsuits
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for MSS integration
- Normative Annex A operational controls
- Explicit records requirements analysis (4.1.2)
- Flexible conformity pathways (self-declare/certify)
- Risk-based planning and measurable objectives
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CCPA Details
What It Is
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), is a state regulation establishing consumer privacy rights for California residents. It targets for-profit businesses meeting thresholds like $25M revenue or handling data of 100K+ consumers/devices. Primary purpose: empower consumers with control over personal information (PI) via rights-based approach, including opt-outs and data minimization.
Key Components
- Core rights: know/access, delete, correct, opt-out of sales/sharing, limit sensitive PI use.
- Obligations: notices at collection, privacy policies, vendor contracts, GPC signal honoring.
- Enforcement by CPPA and Attorney General with $2,500-$7,500 per violation fines; private breach actions.
- No formal certification; compliance via audits, data mapping, DSAR handling.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for applicable businesses to avoid fines, litigation, reputational harm. Drives data governance efficiency, trust-building, market differentiation, GDPR alignment. Reduces breach risks, enables partnerships.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/gap analysis (0-3 months), policies/contracts (1-4 months), technical controls (2-6 months), operationalization/training, ongoing audits. Applies to tech/retail/finance globally if CA data involved; cross-functional effort with tools like OneTrust.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is a certifiable international standard specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, and improving a Management System for Records (MSR). It applies to any organization, using a risk-based, High-Level Structure (HLS) approach (Clauses 4–10) integrated with records-specific operational controls.
Key Components
- HLS clauses (4–10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 & Annex A (normative)records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Built on ISO 15489 principles (authenticity, reliability, usability); flexible conformity (self-declaration, certification).
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures reliable evidence for governance, compliance, audits.
- Mitigates risks (loss, alteration, non-compliance); boosts efficiency, transparency.
- Strategic asset for regulated sectors (finance, healthcare, public); builds stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits.
- Scalable for any size/industry; optional third-party certification via ISO/IEC 17065 bodies. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | CCPA | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer privacy rights and data handling | Records management system governance |
| Industry | All for-profit businesses meeting CA thresholds | Any organization, all sectors worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory California regulation with fines | Voluntary certifiable management standard |
| Testing | CPPA audits and enforcement actions | Internal audits, management reviews, certification |
| Penalties | $2,500-$7,500 per violation, breach lawsuits | No legal penalties, loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CCPA and ISO 30301
CCPA FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 20000 vs BRC
Discover ISO 20000 vs BRC: Compare IT service excellence with food safety standards. Gain key differences, benefits & implementation insights to choose wisely!
ISO 9001 vs ISO 13485
Discover ISO 9001 vs ISO 13485: versatile QMS standard meets medical device powerhouse. Uncover key differences, benefits & pick the best for compliance & growth. Compare now!
RoHS vs UAE PDPL
Compare RoHS hazardous substance bans vs UAE PDPL data privacy rules. Unlock compliance strategies for electronics firms in global markets. Navigate risks now!