CCPA
California regulation for consumer personal data rights
ISO 31000
International standard for risk management guidelines
Quick Verdict
CCPA mandates California consumer privacy rights for qualifying businesses, enforcing data notices and requests with hefty fines. ISO 31000 offers voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations, integrating principles into strategy for resilience and value protection.
CCPA
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
Key Features
- Grants CA residents rights to know, delete, opt-out of PI sales
- Applies to businesses with $25M revenue or 100K+ CA consumers/devices
- Mandates notices at collection and Global Privacy Control honoring
- Imposes $2,500-$7,500 fines per violation by CPPA/AG
- Enables private right of action for data breaches
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Eight principles guiding integrated risk management
- Framework for leadership commitment and governance
- Iterative process for risk assessment and treatment
- Customizable to organizational context and culture
- Non-certifiable guidelines for continual improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CCPA Details
What It Is
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), is a comprehensive state regulation establishing consumer privacy rights for California residents. It targets for-profit businesses meeting thresholds like $25M revenue or handling 100K+ consumers' data, employing a rights-based, operational framework focused on transparency and control over personal information (PI), including sensitive categories.
Key Components
- Core consumer rights: know/access, delete, opt-out of sales/sharing, correct, limit sensitive PI use
- Obligations: notices at collection, privacy policies, DSAR handling within 45 days, vendor contracts, reasonable security
- Enforcement via CPPA and Attorney General with $2,500-$7,500 per-violation fines; private breach actions
- Built on data minimization, verification standards, Global Privacy Control (GPC) honoring
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for applicable businesses to avoid multimillion fines, litigation; enhances data governance, reduces breach risks, builds consumer trust, enables market differentiation, aligns with other privacy laws like GDPR for efficiency.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: scoping/gap analysis (0-3 months), policies/contracts (1-4 months), technical controls (2-6 months), operationalization/training, ongoing audits. Targets enterprises handling CA data across industries; no certification but requires demonstrable compliance via documentation, metrics.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard providing a principles-based framework for managing risk. It applies universally across sectors, focusing on systematic identification, assessment, treatment, monitoring, and communication of risks to create and protect value.
Key Components
- Eight core principles (integrated, structured, customized, inclusive, dynamic, best information, human factors, continual improvement)
- Framework (leadership, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement)
- Process (communication, context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting)
- Non-certifiable; no fixed controls
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances decision-making, resilience, and strategic advantage
- Meets regulatory benchmarks indirectly (e.g., Basel III)
- Drives operational efficiency, stakeholder trust, innovation
- Reduces losses, optimizes capital allocation
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: diagnose/design, build/deploy, operate/optimize, institutionalize
- Applicable to all sizes/industries; customize to context
- Involves policy, training, tools (e.g., risk registers), audits; no formal certification
Key Differences
| Aspect | CCPA | ISO 31000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer privacy rights and data obligations | Enterprise-wide risk management principles |
| Industry | All businesses meeting CA thresholds, global reach | All industries, sectors, organization sizes worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory state regulation with enforcement | Voluntary non-certifiable guidelines framework |
| Testing | Internal audits, consumer request handling tests | Internal reviews, monitoring, continual improvement |
| Penalties | $2,500-$7,500 per violation, private breach actions | No legal penalties, potential regulatory references |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CCPA and ISO 31000
CCPA FAQ
ISO 31000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation
Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20
ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
C-TPAT vs AS9110C
Compare C-TPAT vs AS9110C: CBP's trusted trader security for supply chains vs aerospace QMS for aviation maintenance. Key differences, benefits & strategies inside!
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs BREEAM
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 electronic records rules vs BREEAM sustainability standards. Key compliance insights for pharma & green buildings. Boost strategies—explore now!
HIPAA vs PRINCE2
Discover HIPAA vs PRINCE2: Contrast healthcare privacy/security rules with project governance principles. Master compliance, risk mgmt & tailored strategies for success. Compare now!