EN 1090
European standards for steel and aluminium structural execution
GRI
Global framework for sustainability impact reporting
Quick Verdict
EN 1090 mandates CE marking for structural steel/aluminium via FPC certification in EU construction, while GRI enables voluntary sustainability impact reporting globally. Fabricators need EN 1090 for market access; all firms adopt GRI for stakeholder transparency and ESG credibility.
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4) scaling requirements
- Certified Factory Production Control (FPC) by Notified Body
- CE marking mandatory for EU market access
- Technical execution rules for welding and tolerances
- ISO 3834 integration for welding quality management
GRI
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards
Key Features
- Impact-based materiality via GRI 3 process
- Modular Universal, Sector, Topic Standards
- Mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability
- Broad worker scope including contractors (GRI 403)
- Transparent reasons for disclosure omissions
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is a harmonized European standard family (EN 1090-1/2/3) for execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR). It provides a risk-based framework enabling CE marking for load-bearing components in construction works.
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC) certification by Notified Body.
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical requirements for steel/aluminium (welding, tolerances, inspection, corrosion protection).
- **Execution Classes (EXC1-4)Scales controls by consequence, service, production categories.
- Integrates ISO 3834 for welding; requires traceability, NDT, personnel qualification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU market access; reduces liability, ensures safety. Drives capability in welding/traceability, unlocks high-risk projects, builds stakeholder trust via certified FPC/CE marking.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC build, welding quals, NB certification, surveillance. Targets fabricators; 6-12 months typical; involves training, digital traceability, ongoing audits.
GRI Details
What It Is
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards is a voluntary, modular framework for sustainability reporting. It provides a global common language for organizations to disclose significant economic, environmental, and social impacts. The impact-centric materiality approach requires identifying and prioritizing actual and potential impacts on stakeholders, using a structured four-step process.
Key Components
- Universal Standards (GRI 1, 2, 3): Foundation, general disclosures, material topics.
- **Sector StandardsSector-specific likely material topics (e.g., Oil & Gas, Mining).
- **Topic StandardsSpecific disclosures (e.g., GRI 403 Occupational Health & Safety, GRI 308 Supplier Environmental Assessment). Built on principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability; compliance via GRI Content Index; no certification, but "in accordance" claims.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives accountability, regulatory alignment (e.g., CSRD), risk management, benchmarking. Enhances stakeholder trust, investor appeal, supply-chain resilience.
Implementation Overview
Phased: materiality assessment, data systems, management approaches, content index. Applies universally; involves governance, stakeholder engagement, assurance readiness. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | EN 1090 | GRI |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Execution and conformity of steel/aluminium structures | Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people |
| Industry | Construction, steel/aluminium fabrication (EU/EEA) | All industries worldwide, any organization size |
| Nature | Harmonized mandatory standard for CE marking | Voluntary modular reporting framework |
| Testing | FPC certification, NB audits, surveillance | Self-reported disclosures, optional external assurance |
| Penalties | Market exclusion, no CE marking allowed | Reputational damage, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about EN 1090 and GRI
EN 1090 FAQ
GRI FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses
Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ITIL vs EPA
ITIL vs EPA: Compare ITIL 4's 34 practices (87% adoption) & SVS with EPA standards. Align ITSM for value, cut risks/downtime—boost compliance now!
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs LEED
Discover FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs LEED: Compare electronic records compliance with green building standards. Unlock strategies for pharma facilities to achieve dual regulatory excellence.
FERPA vs WCAG
Discover FERPA vs WCAG: Compare student privacy laws with web accessibility standards for education. Ensure compliant, inclusive sites. Unlock strategies now!