CMMC
DoD framework verifying cybersecurity maturity for FCI and CUI
WCAG
International standard for web content accessibility to disabled users
Quick Verdict
CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting sensitive data, while WCAG provides web accessibility guidelines for all organizations. Companies adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; WCAG reduces litigation risk and expands market reach.
CMMC
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC 2.0)
Key Features
- Three cumulative certification levels for tiered assurance
- Third-party C3PAO and DIBCAC assessments verify compliance
- Aligns 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 controls at Level 2
- Mandates flow-down requirements to DoD subcontractors
- Limits POA&Ms to 180-day closure timelines
WCAG
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2
Key Features
- POUR principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust
- Testable success criteria at A, AA, AAA levels
- Technology-agnostic, backward-compatible layered structure
- Full pages and complete processes conformance requirements
- Informative techniques, failures, and understanding guidance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CMMC Details
What It Is
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC 2.0) is a DoD certification program that verifies appropriate cybersecurity protections for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It consolidates FAR 52.204-21, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 (110 requirements), and NIST SP 800-172 (24 enhanced) into three tiered levels using a risk-based, maturity model approach with defined assessment pathways.
Key Components
- **Three cumulative levelsLevel 1 (17 basic FAR practices), Level 2 (110 NIST controls across 14 domains like Access Control and Incident Response), Level 3 (adds 24 APT-focused enhancements).
- Built on NIST frameworks with practices mapped to assessment objectives.
- Certification model includes self-assessments (Level 1/2), C3PAO (Level 2), DIBCAC (Level 3), SPRS/eMASS reporting, and limited POA&Ms.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for DoD contractors/subcontractors handling FCI/CUI to win contracts; mitigates supply chain risks, reduces breach costs, enables procurement differentiation, and builds trust with primes via verified compliance.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance, scoping/gap analysis, remediation, assessment prep, formal certification, sustainment. Targets all DIB sizes/industries; requires evidence-based audits every 3 years plus annual affirmations. (178 words)
WCAG Details
What It Is
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 is the W3C's global, technology-agnostic standard for accessible web content. It defines testable requirements to ensure content is perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for people with disabilities, using a layered model of principles, guidelines, and success criteria.
Key Components
- **POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.
- 13 guidelines with ~90 success criteria at Levels A (basic), AA (standard), AAA (advanced).
- Informative techniques, failures, and conformance rules (full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported tech, non-interference).
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns with laws like ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA reducing litigation.
- Boosts UX, SEO, market reach (1B+ disabled users), conversion rates.
- Enables procurement, builds trust/reputation.
Implementation Overview
Phased: policy/governance, audits, design systems, CI/CD tools, training, monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries globally; VPATs/audits for claims, no formal certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CMMC | WCAG |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI in DoD supply chain | Web content accessibility for people with disabilities |
| Industry | Defense contractors, DIB (US-focused) | All web-publishing organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory DoD certification program | Voluntary W3C technical standard |
| Testing | Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years | Automated/manual audits, user testing ongoing |
| Penalties | Contract ineligibility, debarment | Litigation under ADA, no direct penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CMMC and WCAG
CMMC FAQ
WCAG FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
OSHA vs ISO 31000
Compare OSHA vs ISO 31000: OSHA's strict safety regs vs ISO 31000's risk principles. Integrate for superior compliance, hazard control & resilience. Dive in now!
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs CIS Controls
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs CIS Controls: Align electronic records compliance with cybersecurity safeguards for data integrity, audit trails & access mgmt. Boost regulated ops—read now!
TISAX vs SOX
Discover TISAX vs SOX: Compare automotive cybersecurity (TISAX) with financial controls (SOX). Uncover compliance strategies, risks, benefits for supply chains & investors. Master both now!