COPPA
U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data
SOX
US federal law mandating internal controls over financial reporting
Quick Verdict
COPPA protects children under 13 from online data collection via parental consent, while SOX mandates public companies assess financial reporting controls. Organizations adopt COPPA for child privacy compliance and SOX for investor protection and governance.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Mandates verifiable parental consent before child data collection
- Protects children under 13 on commercial websites and apps
- Defines broad PII including persistent IDs and geolocation
- Grants parents data access review and deletion rights
- Imposes FTC penalties up to $43,792 per violation
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- CEO/CFO certification of financial reports (Section 302)
- ICFR management assessment and auditor attestation (Section 404)
- PCAOB oversight of public company auditors (Title I)
- Auditor independence and rotation requirements (Title II)
- Whistleblower protections and anti-retaliation (Section 806)
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998 and effective 2000, enforced by the FTC. It safeguards children under 13 from unauthorized personal data collection by commercial websites, apps, and services directed to kids or with actual knowledge of child users. Employs a strict consent-based approach with parental controls.
Key Components
- Verifiable parental consent (VPC) via 11+ methods like credit cards or video calls.
- Expansive personal information (PII) definition: names, addresses, persistent identifiers, geolocation, audio/video files.
- Requirements for privacy policies, data security, minimization, and parental access/review/deletion.
- Safe harbor self-regulatory programs (e.g., ESRB, iKeepSafe). No formal certification; compliance audited by FTC.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for covered operators to avoid civil penalties up to $43,792 per violation (e.g., YouTube's $170M fine). Mitigates legal risks, builds parental trust, enables safe child-directed services globally targeting U.S. kids. Enhances reputation in edtech, gaming, adtech.
Implementation Overview
Assess child-directed content or actual knowledge; post policies, deploy age gates/VPC, limit data collection. Applies to all sizes, especially commercial online services/IoT; extraterritorial for U.S. children. Key steps: audience analysis, consent mechanisms, audits. Ongoing: monitor FTC updates, data retention.
SOX Details
What It Is
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a US federal statute establishing corporate accountability standards. It mandates robust internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and accurate disclosures to protect investors post-scandals like Enron. SOX employs a risk-based, control-oriented approach via SEC rules and PCAOB standards.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive certifications and ICFR (Titles III-IV).
- Core sections: 302 (CEO/CFO certifications), 404 (ICFR assessment/attestation), 409 (real-time disclosures).
- Built on COSO framework; no fixed control count, focuses on key controls.
- Compliance via annual management reports and auditor opinions.
Why Organizations Use It
Public companies comply to avoid penalties, enhance governance, reduce fraud risk, build investor trust, and lower capital costs. It drives operational efficiency and M&A readiness.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping, documentation, testing, remediation using top-down risk assessment. Applies to US-listed firms; audit required for accelerated filers. Involves finance, IT, audit teams enterprise-wide. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | SOX |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Child privacy online data collection under 13 | Public company financial reporting controls |
| Industry | Online services, apps targeting children globally | U.S. public companies all sectors |
| Nature | Mandatory FTC regulation with consent rules | Mandatory SEC law with ICFR assessments |
| Testing | Parental consent verification, data security audits | Annual ICFR testing and auditor attestation |
| Penalties | $43,792 per violation, FTC fines | Criminal fines up to $5M, imprisonment |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and SOX
COPPA FAQ
SOX FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r
CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CCPA vs ISO 27701
Compare CCPA vs ISO 27701: CA's law mandates consumer rights & fines, while ISO 27701 certifies global PIMS for privacy risks. Key diffs, compliance tips & strategies inside. Boost your program now!
RoHS vs COBIT
Discover RoHS vs COBIT: Contrast EU's hazardous substances directive for EEE compliance with ISACA's IT governance framework. Unlock strategies for risk management, exemptions & audits. Compare now!
WCAG vs TOGAF
Discover WCAG vs TOGAF: Compare web accessibility standards with enterprise architecture frameworks for compliance, strategy & implementation. Boost digital governance now!