Standards Comparison

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's regulation for network security and data localization

    VS

    ISO 28000

    Voluntary
    2022

    International standard for supply chain security management systems

    Quick Verdict

    CSL mandates cybersecurity and data localization for China operations, enforcing compliance via fines. ISO 28000 provides voluntary supply chain security framework globally. Companies adopt CSL for legal survival in China; ISO 28000 for resilience and certification advantages.

    Standard

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates data localization for CII and important data
    • Requires technical safeguards and real-time network monitoring
    • Assigns senior executive cybersecurity responsibilities
    • Binds all network operators serving Chinese users
    • Imposes fines up to 5% of annual revenue
    Supply Chain Security

    ISO 28000

    ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems — Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based supply chain security assessment and treatment
    • PDCA cycle for continual improvement and resilience
    • Leadership commitment and cross-functional governance
    • Supplier interdependencies and third-party controls
    • Integration with ISO 27001, 22301 via High Level Structure

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

    What It Is

    The Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL), enacted June 1, 2017, is a nationwide statutory framework. It governs network operators, service providers, and data processors in Chinese jurisdiction to secure information systems. Comprising 69 articles, its primary purpose is protecting national security via three pillars: network security, data localization, and cybersecurity governance. It employs mandatory, risk-based requirements with technical and organizational controls.

    Key Components

    • **Network SecurityMandatory safeguards, periodic testing, real-time monitoring.
    • **Data Localization & PIPLocal storage for Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) and important data; assessments for cross-border transfers.
    • **Cybersecurity GovernanceExecutive responsibilities, incident reporting within 24 hours, authority cooperation. Applies baseline to all network operators, heightened for CII. Compliance via government assessments, no central certification but evaluations like SPCT.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for entities serving Chinese users to avoid fines up to 5% annual revenue, shutdowns, reputational harm. Drives trust, operational efficiency via modern architectures, innovation through local R&D, and competitive market advantages in China.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: pre-engagement, gap analysis, architectural redesign (localization, ZTA, SIEM), organizational governance, testing/certification. Targets MNCs, CII operators, all with Chinese footprint; requires ongoing monitoring, audits.

    ISO 28000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 28000:2022 is an international management system standard specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a security management system (SMS) focused on supply chain security and resilience. It uses a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach to protect people, assets, goods, infrastructure, and information.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
    • Emphasizes risk assessment, security strategies, incident response, supplier controls, and continual improvement.
    • Built on ISO High Level Structure (HLS) for integration with ISO 9001, 22301, 27001.
    • Optional third-party certification via accredited bodies per ISO 28003.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Reduces supply chain disruptions, theft, sabotage; lowers insurance costs.
    • Meets contractual, regulatory drivers like C-TPAT equivalents.
    • Enhances market access, trade facilitation, stakeholder trust.
    • Provides competitive edge in logistics, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, audits (6-36 months scalable by size).
    • Applies to all sizes/industries with supply chains; involves mapping, training, supplier engagement.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 28000
    Supply chain security management systems

    Industry

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 28000
    Logistics, manufacturing, any supply chain

    Nature

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 28000
    Voluntary international standard

    Testing

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 28000
    Internal audits, certification audits

    Penalties

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 28000
    Loss of certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) and ISO 28000

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) FAQ

    ISO 28000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages