FSSC 22000
GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management systems
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security capability.
Quick Verdict
FSSC 22000 delivers GFSI-recognized food safety certification for global food chains, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial entities. Food firms seek market access; banks ensure regulatory compliance and cyber defense.
FSSC 22000
Food Safety System Certification 22000 Version 6
Key Features
- GFSI-benchmarked FSMS certification across food chain
- Integrates ISO 22000, PRPs, and additional requirements
- Mandates food defense, fraud, and allergen plans
- Requires 50% operational audit time on PRPs
- Enforces food safety culture and quality objectives
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- Commensurate capability with threats and vulnerabilities
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
- Systematic independent testing and assurance
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FSSC 22000 Details
What It Is
FSSC 22000 (Food Safety System Certification 22000 Version 6) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to food chain categories from primary production to chemicals, using a risk-based PDCA approach integrating ISO 22000:2018 requirements.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsISO 22000 clauses 4-10, sector-specific PRPs (e.g., ISO/TS 22002 series), FSSC Additional Requirements (e.g., food defense, fraud, culture).
- Over 100 combined requirements with HACCP/OPRP/CCP controls.
- Built on PDCA cycle; certification via licensed bodies per ISO 22003-1:2022.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures market access via GFSI recognition and public register.
- Mitigates risks like recalls, fraud, adulteration.
- Builds supply-chain trust; supports SDGs like waste reduction.
- Enhances efficiency, quality integration, global trade competitiveness.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, audits (Stage 1/2).
- Applies to all sizes across food sectors worldwide.
- Requires CB certification, surveillance, recertification every 3 years.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. The approach is risk-based and proportionate, focusing on governance, controls, and assurance.
Key Components
- **GovernanceBoard ultimate accountability, defined roles.
- **Risk managementAsset classification by criticality/sensitivity, commensurate controls.
- **Incident responseDetection, response plans, annual testing.
- **AssuranceSystematic testing, internal audit, third-party evaluation. No fixed control count; 36 paragraphs outline requirements. Compliance via evidence, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, enforcement.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident impact, builds trust.
- Strategic benefits: operational continuity, better vendor terms, market differentiation.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset register, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes in APRA sectors (Australia). Requires Board oversight, APRA notifications; audited via internal/external reviews. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | FSSC 22000 | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Food safety management systems across food chain | Information security for financial institutions |
| Industry | Food manufacturing, packaging, logistics globally | Australian banks, insurers, superannuation funds |
| Nature | GFSI-benchmarked voluntary certification scheme | Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | CB audits, PRP verification, internal audits | Systematic independent testing, internal audit |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market access denial | Fines, supervisory actions, license restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FSSC 22000 and APRA CPS 234
FSSC 22000 FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic
First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CMMI vs ISO 30301
Compare CMMI vs ISO 30301: CMMI drives process maturity for agile delivery; ISO 30301 secures records as strategic assets. Boost compliance, efficiency—choose wisely!
COBIT vs ISO 31000
Discover COBIT vs ISO 31000: IT governance framework meets risk management gold standard. Align IT with business goals, optimize compliance & resilience. Compare now!
J-SOX vs CSA
Compare J-SOX vs CSA: Japan's principles-based ICFR for 3,800+ listed firms vs structured standards. Unlock key diffs, COSO alignment, IT focus & compliance strategies. Boost reliability now!