Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    ISO 14001

    Voluntary
    2015

    International standard for environmental management systems

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates digital resilience for EU financial firms against ICT risks, while ISO 14001 is a voluntary global standard for environmental management. Firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; ISO 14001 for sustainability, efficiency, and market advantage.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks overseen by management
    • Requires 4-hour initial reporting for major incidents
    • Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical entities
    • Directly oversees critical third-party ICT providers via ESAs
    • Harmonizes resilience standards across 27 EU member states
    Environmental Management

    ISO 14001

    ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based planning for environmental aspects and opportunities
    • Lifecycle perspective including supply chain impacts
    • Annex SL alignment for integrated management systems
    • Top management leadership and commitment requirements
    • PDCA cycle for continual improvement

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation enhancing digital operational resilience of financial entities against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. It targets 20 financial entity types and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), applying from January 17, 2025. Employs a risk-based, proportional approach integrating ICT risks into business strategies.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, annual reviews.
    • **Incident Reporting4/72-hour notifications, root-cause analysis.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT.
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, ESAs supervision.
    • Information sharing mechanisms. No fixed control count; management body oversight, aligned with RTS/ITS standards. Compliance via authority reporting and audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for EU financials to avoid 2% turnover fines, counters 74% ransomware prevalence, builds post-CrowdStrike resilience. Drives systemic risk reduction, stakeholder trust, innovation in cybersecurity tools.

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses per ESAs RTS, deploy tools for monitoring/testing, tailor by size/complexity. Targets EU financial sector; involves training, multi-vendor strategies, ongoing ESAs oversight. Proportional for SMEs.

    ISO 14001 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 14001:2015 is the international standard specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Environmental Management System (EMS). It offers a flexible, process-based framework applicable to any organization, emphasizing risk-based thinking, lifecycle perspectives, and continual improvement over prescriptive targets.

    Key Components

    • 10 clauses (4-10) aligned with Annex SL High-Level Structure.
    • Core elements: context analysis, leadership, planning (risks/opportunities), support, operations, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Built on PDCA cycle; requires documented information, not fixed procedures.
    • Certification via accredited external audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Ensures compliance with obligations, enhances performance.
    • Drives cost savings, risk reduction, efficiency.
    • Boosts reputation, stakeholder trust, procurement advantages.
    • Supports ESG goals, supply chain sustainability.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, controls/training, monitoring/audits, certification.
    • Scalable for all sizes/sectors; 6-18 months typical.
    • Involves leadership commitment, internal audits, management reviews.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance
    ISO 14001
    Environmental management systems

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities and ICT providers
    ISO 14001
    All industries worldwide

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation
    ISO 14001
    Voluntary certification standard

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic, triennial TLPT
    ISO 14001
    Internal audits, management reviews

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    ISO 14001
    Loss of certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and ISO 14001

    DORA FAQ

    ISO 14001 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages