DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
NIST CSF
Voluntary framework for cybersecurity risk management
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance firms via risk frameworks, testing, and third-party oversight, enforced by fines. NIST CSF offers voluntary, flexible cybersecurity guidance globally across sectors for risk prioritization and communication.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
- Requires 4-hour initial major incident reporting
- Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing
- Oversees critical third-party ICT providers by ESAs
- Harmonizes resilience across 20 financial entity types
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)
Key Features
- Six core Functions led by new Govern
- Current/Target Profiles enable gap analysis
- Four Tiers assess risk management maturity
- 112 Subcategories with standard mappings
- Supply chain risk management category
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulatory framework enhancing financial sector resilience against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. Applicable from January 17, 2025, it covers 20 financial entity types and critical ICT providers (CTPPs), using a proportional, risk-based approach to shift from reactive to proactive strategies.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentify, mitigate risks with annual reviews.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour initial, 72-hour intermediate notifications for major events.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests; triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).
- **Third-Party OversightContractual due diligence, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Compliance enforced by authorities, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for ~22,000 EU entities to avoid 2% turnover fines, reduce systemic risks (74% cite cyberattacks top threat), foster trust, and support digital transformation amid incidents like 2024 CrowdStrike outage.
Implementation Overview
Conduct gap analyses, develop policies, implement testing/vendor monitoring. Tailored by size/complexity; EU-focused for financials. Preparation via 2024 RTS/ITS; ongoing authority oversight.
NIST CSF Details
What It Is
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a voluntary, risk-based framework from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). It provides organizations of all sizes and sectors with a flexible methodology to identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks, evolving from critical infrastructure focus to universal applicability in CSF 2.0 (2024).
Key Components
- **Six Core FunctionsGovern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover.
- **Structure22 Categories, 112 Subcategories with informative references to standards like ISO 27001.
- **Implementation TiersPartial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier 4).
- **ProfilesCurrent vs. Target for prioritization. No certification; self-attestation model.
Why Organizations Use It
- Establishes common risk language for executives and stakeholders.
- Enables prioritization, supply chain management, compliance support (e.g., federal agencies).
- Drives resilience, cost-effective improvements, and trust with partners.
Implementation Overview
- Assess posture via Profiles/Tiers, map gaps, implement outcomes.
- Quick starts for SMEs; scalable for enterprises. Global applicability, no formal audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | NIST CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Digital operational resilience in finance | Comprehensive cybersecurity risk management |
| Industry | EU financial entities and CTPPs | All sectors, global applicability |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation | Voluntary risk-based framework |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT | Self-assessed via Tiers and Profiles |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover fines | No legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and NIST CSF
DORA FAQ
NIST CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Why applying the NIST CSF Standard is a Life-Saver!
Discover why NIST CSF 2.0 is a life-saver for organizations. This flexible framework's 6 functions—Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—boost res
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
HITRUST CSF vs AS9100
Compare HITRUST CSF vs AS9100: Cybersecurity framework meets aerospace QMS. Uncover differences, mappings & implementation for compliance. Choose wisely now!
PDPA vs ISO 21001
PDPA vs ISO 21001: Compare Singapore's data privacy law with educational management standards. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & learner-focused best practices for secure excellence.
ISO 22000 vs SAMA CSF
Discover ISO 22000 vs SAMA CSF: Food safety FSMS meets Saudi financial cyber framework. Compare HLS/PDCA, maturity models & controls for resilient compliance. Explore now!