DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
WCAG
International standard for web content accessibility.
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance against disruptions, while WCAG provides testable guidelines for accessible web content globally. Financial firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; all organizations use WCAG to avoid ADA lawsuits and serve disabled users.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Mandatory comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
- 4-hour initial reporting for major ICT incidents
- Threat-led penetration testing every 3 years
- Oversight of critical third-party ICT providers
- Harmonized resilience rules across EU states
WCAG
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2
Key Features
- POUR principles organize accessibility requirements
- Testable success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels
- Technology-agnostic across web platforms and frameworks
- Backward-compatible additive version updates
- Informative techniques separate from normative criteria
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is a transformative EU regulation enhancing digital operational resilience for the financial sector. Enacted in 2022 and applying from January 17, 2025, it targets 20 financial entity types and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs). DORA adopts a risk-based, proportional approach to counter ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and system failures, harmonizing rules across 27 member states.
Key Components
- Core pillars: ICT Risk Management, Incident Reporting, Digital Operational Resilience Testing, and Third-Party Risk Oversight.
- Standardized incident reporting (4-hour initial notification for major events impacting >5% users or €100k+ losses).
- Annual basic tests and triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical entities.
- ESAs oversight of CTPPs with contractual standards and fees up to €1M. Built on proactive strategies, enforced via fines up to 2% global turnover.
Why Organizations Use It
DORA ensures legal compliance amid rising cyber threats (74% firms hit by ransomware). It mitigates systemic risks, boosts resilience, fosters information sharing, and builds stakeholder trust. Strategic benefits include harmonized operations and competitive edge in cybersecurity.
Implementation Overview
Conduct gap analyses, develop ICT frameworks, implement testing programs, and manage vendors. Applies EU-wide to ~22,000 entities, scaled by size/complexity. Involves ongoing reporting and remediation; no formal certification but authority audits. Typical timeline: 18-24 months preparation.
WCAG Details
What It Is
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), developed by the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative, is a globally recognized, technology-agnostic framework for making web content accessible to people with disabilities. Its scope covers websites, apps, and digital documents, using a layered structure of principles, guidelines, and testable success criteria organized by conformance levels (A, AA, AAA).
Key Components
- **POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust.
- 13 guidelines with ~80 success criteria across levels.
- Informative techniques, failures, and understanding documents.
- Conformance model requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported technologies, and non-interference.
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns with legal benchmarks (ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA).
- Mitigates litigation risks and procurement barriers.
- Enhances UX, SEO, conversion rates, and market reach.
- Builds stakeholder trust and reduces support costs.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: policy establishment, gap analysis, remediation via design systems/CI/CD, role-based training, hybrid testing (automated/manual/user), and ongoing monitoring. Applies universally; no mandatory certification but VPAT/ACR and audits common. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | WCAG |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Digital operational resilience in finance | Web content accessibility for disabilities |
| Industry | EU financial entities and CTPPs | All industries, global web content |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation | Voluntary W3C technical standard |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT | Automated scans, manual AT testing |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover fines | No direct penalties, litigation risk |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and WCAG
DORA FAQ
WCAG FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FISMA vs ISO 27018
Compare FISMA vs ISO 27018: US federal risk-based cybersecurity law (NIST RMF) meets global cloud PII privacy code. Master compliance differences, controls & strategies for secure federal data. Dive in now!
ISO 27001 vs ISO 20000
Discover ISO 27001 vs ISO 20000: security resilience vs service excellence. Uncover key differences, benefits, integration strategies & implementation for compliance success. Compare now!
Six Sigma vs AEO
Discover Six Sigma vs AEO: data-driven process mastery meets trusted trader compliance. Boost efficiency, cut defects, secure supply chains. Choose wisely—read now!