What is the primary objective of **EMAS**?

**The primary objective of EMAS is to promote continuous improvement in environmental performance through structured environmental management systems, systematic evaluation, public information provision, stakeholder dialogue, and active employee involvement.** As defined in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 (EMAS III), it requires organizations to implement an EMS, conduct periodic performance evaluations, produce validated environmental statements per Annex IV, and demonstrate verifiable progress in core indicators like energy, emissions, water, waste, materials, and biodiversity.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **EMAS**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with EMAS, as it is a voluntary scheme under EU Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009.** Participation is open to any organization—public or private, any size or sector, inside or outside the EU—with 4,141 registered organizations and 16,154 sites as of September 2025. Professionals such as environmental verifiers and Competent Bodies in each Member State manage registration, but uptake is driven by strategic needs like procurement advantages or regulatory relief.

Does **EMAS** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, EMAS mandates independent verification and validation by accredited or licensed environmental verifiers, but not traditional certification.** Verifiers confirm EMS conformity (Annex II), legal compliance, internal audits (Annex III), and validate the public environmental statement (Annex IV), issuing a declaration (Annex VII). Competent Bodies then register organizations, enabling EMAS logo use; full verification occurs every three years (four for small organizations under Article 7).

How often should an assessment for **EMAS** be performed?

**EMAS requires internal audits at least annually, with full coverage of activities over a three-year cycle (extendable to four for small organizations), and external verification every three years.** Annual validated updates to the environmental statement are mandatory (biennial publication for qualifying small organizations per Article 7), alongside management reviews. Substantial changes trigger reviews within six months (Article 8).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **EMAS**?

**Non-compliance with EMAS results in suspension or deletion from the register by the Competent Body, loss of EMAS logo use, and potential reputational damage.** Per Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009, failure to submit validated statements, demonstrate legal compliance (Article 13), or maintain EMS leads to deregistration; no direct fines apply due to its voluntary nature, but verified breaches block renewal.

An **EMAS** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, EMAS fully incorporates ISO 14001 EMS requirements in Annex II, enabling seamless mapping and combined audits.** Organizations with ISO 14001 can upgrade to EMAS by adding verified legal compliance, public statements (Annex IV), and performance indicators; Article 45 allows Competent Bodies to recognize equivalent national schemes like Norway’s Eco-Lighthouse for partial equivalence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **EMAS**?

**The first step to implement EMAS is conducting an initial environmental review per Article 4 and Annex I.** This baseline analysis identifies direct/indirect aspects, legal obligations, and significance criteria, forming the foundation for the EMS, policy, and statement; it must precede EMS development and verification.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 28000**?

**ISO 28000 specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving a security management system (SMS) for supply chain security.** The 2022 edition provides a risk-based framework using the PDCA cycle to identify threats, vulnerabilities, and interdependencies across supply chains, protecting people, assets, goods, infrastructure, and information. It emphasizes leadership commitment, risk assessment per ISO 31000 principles, operational controls, performance evaluation via audits and metrics, and continual improvement.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 28000**?

**ISO 28000 is voluntary with no universal legal mandate but becomes professionally required via contracts, tenders, or programs like customs facilitation.** It applies scalably to all organization sizes in logistics, manufacturing, retail, pharmaceuticals, energy, ports, and 3PL/4PL providers. C-suite executives, supply-chain directors, security managers, risk officers, and procurement leads must address it when driven by commercial obligations, insurance demands, or public-sector supplier conditions.

Does **ISO 28000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 28000 conformity can be verified internally or externally but third-party certification follows ISO 28003 requirements via accredited bodies.** Certification involves Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (implementation audit), with 3-year validity and annual surveillance. While optional, it demonstrates assurance to stakeholders; internal audits per Clause 9.2 are mandatory for all.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 28000** be performed?

**ISO 28000 requires risk assessments to be maintained continuously, with formal reviews at planned intervals or upon changes.** Internal audits occur via a risk-based program (Clause 9.2), management reviews at least annually (Clause 9.3), and security risk reassessments yearly or triggered by incidents, supply-chain changes, or external factors. Corrective actions follow nonconformities immediately.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 28000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 28000 risks operational disruptions, financial losses, reputational damage, and contractual penalties.** Unmanaged supply-chain vulnerabilities lead to theft, sabotage, or incidents causing outages, insurance hikes, lost tenders, and litigation. Without certification or evidence, organizations forfeit market access, trade facilitation, and partner trust.

An **ISO 28000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 28000:2022 aligns with the High Level Structure for integration with ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22301, and ISO/IEC 27001.** It shares PDCA, risk-based planning (ISO 31000), leadership, and audit clauses, enabling unified risk registers, documentation, internal audits, and management reviews for efficiency.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 28000**?

**The first step is executive commitment via a project charter defining scope, boundaries, and resources.** Conduct supply-chain mapping and gap analysis against Clauses 4-10, appointing a Senior Responsible Owner to baseline context, risks, and interested parties.

EMAS vs ISO 28000

Standards Comparison

EMAS

Voluntary

1993

EU voluntary scheme for environmental management and audit

ISO 28000

Voluntary

2022

International standard for supply chain security management systems.

Quick Verdict

EMAS drives verified environmental performance via EU-regulated public reporting, while ISO 28000 builds risk-based supply chain security systems. Organizations adopt EMAS for EU credibility and efficiency; ISO 28000 for global resilience and partner trust.

Environmental Management

EMAS

Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 Eco-Management and Audit Scheme

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Verified legal compliance with environmental laws
Mandatory validated public environmental statement
Independent third-party verifier validation
Core environmental performance indicators required
Continuous improvement in actual performance

Supply Chain Security

ISO 28000

ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems — Requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based supply chain security management framework
PDCA cycle for continual improvement and audits
Supplier and third-party risk governance requirements
Integration with ISO 27001, 22301 standards
Incident response and resilience planning

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

EMAS Details

What It Is

EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme), governed by Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009, is a voluntary EU framework for environmental management systems. It promotes continuous environmental performance improvement through structured evaluation, reporting, and verification, applicable to all sectors and organization sizes.

Key Components

Initial environmental review covering direct/indirect aspects
ISO 14001-aligned EMS with employee involvement
Core indicators (energy, materials, water, waste, emissions, biodiversity)
Internal audits and management reviews
Validated public environmental statements; independent verifier registration

Why Organizations Use It

Verified legal compliance reduces risks
Transparency builds stakeholder trust
Performance gains via resource efficiency
EU procurement advantages and ESG synergies
Supports CSRD/ESRS reporting

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: review, policy/programme, EMS deployment, audits, verification. Suitable for SMEs (derogations) and multisite operations; requires 12-18 months, verifier accreditation.

ISO 28000 Details

What It Is

ISO 28000:2022 is an international management system standard titled Security and resilience — Security management systems — Requirements. It provides a risk-based framework for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a security management system (SMS) focused on supply chain protection against threats like theft, sabotage, and disruptions.

Key Components

Core clauses follow **PDCA cyclecontext, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Emphasizes risk assessment/treatment, supplier governance, incident response, and continual improvement.
Aligns with ISO HLS for integration with ISO 9001, 27001, 22301.
Optional certification via accredited bodies per ISO 28003.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates operational/financial risks, reduces insurance costs.
Enables market access, trade facilitation, competitive edge.
Meets contractual/regulatory expectations; builds stakeholder trust.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: scoping, gap analysis, risk assessment, deployment, audits.
Scalable for all sizes/industries like logistics, manufacturing.
Involves training, supplier engagement, KPIs; certification optional but common.

Key Differences

Aspect	EMAS	ISO 28000
Scope	Environmental performance management and reporting	Supply chain security management system
Industry	All EU sectors, voluntary environmental focus	Global supply chain, logistics, manufacturing
Nature	EU Regulation, voluntary with verified reporting	International standard, voluntary certification
Testing	Independent verifier validation annually	Internal audits, optional third-party certification
Penalties	Registration suspension/deletion for non-compliance	No legal penalties, loss of certification

Scope

EMAS

Environmental performance management and reporting

ISO 28000

Supply chain security management system

Industry

EMAS

All EU sectors, voluntary environmental focus

ISO 28000

Global supply chain, logistics, manufacturing

Nature

EMAS

EU Regulation, voluntary with verified reporting

ISO 28000

International standard, voluntary certification

Testing

EMAS

Independent verifier validation annually

ISO 28000

Internal audits, optional third-party certification

Penalties

EMAS

Registration suspension/deletion for non-compliance

ISO 28000

No legal penalties, loss of certification

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about EMAS and ISO 28000

EMAS FAQ

ISO 28000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: First 5 Steps to Ace Your Type 2 Audit with Infographic

Ace your SOC 2 Type 2 audit with the first 5 essential steps: evidence collection, auditor tips, red flags from SignWell's experience. Get checklists & infograp

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

AS9100 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

Discover AS9100 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Aerospace QMS rigor meets AI governance. Compare clauses, risks & implementation for compliant innovation. Unlock key insights now!

APPI vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

APPI vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Compare Japan's data privacy law with SEC's incident disclosure mandates. Expert strategies for compliance, risk management & global ops.

HITRUST CSF vs ISO 31000

Explore HITRUST CSF vs ISO 31000: Certifiable controls & maturity scoring vs flexible risk guidelines. Optimize compliance, assurance & resilience—choose the right framework now!

EMAS

ISO 28000

Quick Verdict

EMAS

Key Features

ISO 28000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

EMAS Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 28000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

EMAS FAQ

What is the primary objective of EMAS?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with EMAS?

Does EMAS require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for EMAS be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with EMAS?

An EMAS be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing EMAS?

ISO 28000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 28000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 28000?

Does ISO 28000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 28000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 28000?

An ISO 28000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 28000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: First 5 Steps to Ace Your Type 2 Audit with Infographic

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

AS9100 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

APPI vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

HITRUST CSF vs ISO 31000