EPA
Federal regulations for air, water, waste protection via standards
EN 1090
EU standard for steel/aluminium structures execution and CE marking
Quick Verdict
EPA enforces US environmental compliance via statutes like CAA/CWA/RCRA for pollution control, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking for EU structural steel/aluminium fabrication. Companies adopt EPA to avoid penalties; EN 1090 for market access and liability protection.
EPA
U.S. EPA Standards (40 CFR Title 40)
Key Features
- Multi-layered system: statutes, 40 CFR regs, permits, enforcement
- Technology-based limits combined with health-protective standards
- Evidence-driven compliance via monitoring, QA/QC, reporting
- Federal-state partnership translating national baselines site-specifically
- Predictable enforcement pipelines with civil penalties, SEPs
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
- Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
- CE marking and Declaration of Performance
- Welding quality management via ISO 3834
- Material traceability and NDT inspection
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
EPA Details
What It Is
EPA standards are a family of legally binding regulations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, codified in Title 40 CFR. They implement statutes like CAA, CWA, RCRA to protect health/environment. Scope covers air, water, waste; uses risk-based systems blending technology controls with health endpoints.
Key Components
- Statutory mandates, performance limits/thresholds
- Permitting (NPDES, Title V, RCRA)
- Monitoring/reporting (DMRs, QA/QC)
- Enforcement structures Federal-state model; compliance via data/audits, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for regulated entities avoiding penalties/liabilities. Drives risk reduction, efficiency, ESG gains, market access, grants. Builds stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis (1-3mo), controls/SOPs (2-6mo), deployment/training (3-12mo), audits/reporting (ongoing). Applies industry-wide; site-specific via permits/inspections.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is the harmonized European standard family (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) for execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components/kits. It enables CE marking under CPR via risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-4), governing fabrication, welding, tolerances, and inspection.
Key Components
- **Factory Production Control (FPC)Certified internal system for traceability, processes, and testing.
- **Welding qualityISO 3834-aligned coordination and qualifications.
- Material controls, NDT/inspection, corrosion protection.
- AVCP with Notified Body certification and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for EU/EEA market access and legal CE marking.
- Mitigates liability, ensures structural safety.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables high-risk projects (e.g., bridges, stadia).
- Drives quality, reduces rework, competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC development, personnel training, ITT/ITC, NB audits. Targets fabricators in construction; 6-12 months typical, scalable by EXC.
Key Differences
| Aspect | EPA | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Environmental pollution control across air, water, waste | Structural steel/aluminium fabrication and conformity |
| Industry | All industrial sectors, US-wide | Construction/metal fabrication, EU/EEA market |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal regulations/statutes | Harmonized standard enabling CE marking |
| Testing | Continuous monitoring, self-reporting, EPA inspections | Factory audits, NDT, notified body surveillance |
| Penalties | Civil/criminal fines, shutdowns, remediation | Market exclusion, certificate withdrawal, liability |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about EPA and EN 1090
EPA FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
APPI vs GDPR UK
Discover APPI vs GDPR UK: Key differences in Japan's privacy law & UK GDPR on consent, transfers & rights. Master compliance for global ops. Expert insights await!
APPI vs SOC 2
Compare APPI vs SOC 2: Japan's data privacy law vs U.S. trust framework. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for global success. Secure your ops now!
BRC vs IFS Food
Discover BRC vs IFS Food: Compare GFSI standards, structures, audits & compliance. Unlock key differences to select the best for your food safety success now!