EPA
U.S. federal regulations for air, water, waste protection
GLBA
U.S. federal regulation for financial privacy and safeguards
Quick Verdict
EPA mandates environmental compliance via pollution controls and monitoring for industries, while GLBA requires financial institutions to protect customer data privacy and security through risk assessments and safeguards. Companies adopt EPA to avoid massive fines; GLBA to prevent breaches and enforcement.
EPA
U.S. EPA Regulations (40 CFR Title 40)
Key Features
- 1. Multi-layered standards across air, water, waste programs
- 2. Site-specific permits enforcing national baselines
- 3. Mandatory monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting requirements
- 4. Technology-based and health-protective performance limits
- 5. Strict liability enforcement with penalty policies
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Key Features
- Privacy notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing
- Written information security program with safeguards
- Qualified Individual designation and board reporting
- 30-day FTC breach notification for 500+ consumers
- Service provider oversight and risk assessments
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
EPA Details
What It Is
EPA standards are legally binding regulations under statutes like CAA, CWA, and RCRA, codified in 40 CFR. This regulatory framework implements environmental protection across air, water, and waste media. Primary purpose: protect human health and environment via performance standards, permits, and enforcement. Approach combines technology-based limits (e.g., MACT, effluent guidelines) with health-based criteria (e.g., NAAQS, WQS).
Key Components
- Statutory authority, 40 CFR rules, numeric/narrative limits.
- Permitting (NPDES, Title V, RCRA), monitoring/reporting (DMRs, LDAR).
- Enforcement pathways with civil/criminal penalties. Built on federal-state implementation; no central certification but permit compliance and audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for regulated entities; avoids penalties, shutdowns, liabilities. Enhances risk management, ESG reputation, operational efficiency via data-driven compliance. Builds stakeholder trust through transparency tools like ECHO/ICIS.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, EMS design, controls deployment, audits. Applies to industrial facilities nationwide; state variations require layered registers. Ongoing via e-CFR tracking, no formal certification but inspections/enforcement audits.
GLBA Details
What It Is
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1999, known as the Financial Modernization Act. It is a regulation imposing privacy and security obligations on financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). GLBA uses a risk-based approach via the Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule, focusing on transparency, consumer choice, and data protection.
Key Components
- **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Mandates initial/annual notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing with nonaffiliates.
- **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Requires comprehensive security programs with administrative, technical, physical safeguards, including risk assessments and testing.
- **Pretexting ProvisionsProhibits false pretenses for obtaining NPI. Built on governance and controls; enforced via FTC audits, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for broad financial entities (banks, fintech, tax firms).
- Mitigates penalties ($100K/violation), builds customer trust, enhances resilience.
- Strategic: Vendor oversight, breach readiness yield competitive edges.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping NPI, risk assessment, controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing. Targets U.S. financial institutions; FTC/banking regulators audit compliance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | EPA | GLBA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Environmental pollution control across air/water/waste | Consumer financial data privacy and security |
| Industry | All industrial sectors, multi-state operators | Financial institutions including non-banks |
| Nature | Mandatory environmental statutes/regulations | Mandatory privacy/security rules for finance |
| Testing | Monitoring, sampling, inspections, DMR reporting | Risk assessments, pen tests, vulnerability scans |
| Penalties | Civil/criminal penalties, injunctive relief | $100K/violation civil, 5yr imprisonment criminal |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about EPA and GLBA
EPA FAQ
GLBA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026
Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation
Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20
NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch
Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
IEC 62443 vs ISO 27701
Discover IEC 62443 vs ISO 27701: OT cybersecurity powerhouse meets privacy PIMS. Zones/SLs vs controller controls—key diffs, mappings & implementation for industrial resilience. Secure now!
NIST CSF vs ISO 27701
Compare NIST CSF vs ISO 27701: Cyber risk mgmt powerhouse meets privacy PIMS. Key diffs, functions, benefits & mappings to boost compliance—discover now!
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs REACH
Unlock FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs REACH: Compare scopes, controls & enforcement for electronic records and chemical regs. Expert insights ensure global compliance mastery.