EPA
U.S. federal regulations for air, water, waste protection
SAMA CSF
Saudi framework for financial cybersecurity maturity model
Quick Verdict
EPA enforces environmental standards for US industries via permits and monitoring, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms. Organizations adopt EPA for legal compliance and SAMA CSF for sector resilience and regulatory approval.
EPA
U.S. EPA Standards (40 CFR Title 40)
Key Features
- Multi-layered systems: statutes, 40 CFR, permits, enforcement
- Hybrid health-based and technology-driven performance standards
- Evidence-driven compliance via monitoring and QA/QC
- Federal baselines with state-specific implementation flexibility
- Predictable enforcement pathways and penalty structures
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level maturity model targeting minimum Level 3
- Four domains including third-party cybersecurity
- Board-level governance and CISO requirements
- Sector-specific controls for payments and e-banking
- Self-assessment with SAMA regulatory audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
EPA Details
What It Is
EPA standards are a family of legally binding regulations under major U.S. environmental statutes like CAA, CWA, and RCRA, codified in 40 CFR. They form comprehensive frameworks for protecting air, water, and land, using a systems approach combining national baselines, technology-based limits, health-protective criteria, permitting, monitoring, and enforcement.
Key Components
- Numeric limits, thresholds, performance criteria across air (NAAQS, MACT), water (effluent guidelines, NPDES), waste (RCRA Subparts AA/BB/CC).
- Permitting (Title V, NPDES), monitoring/recordkeeping, reporting (DMRs, e-reporting).
- Tiered standards (BPT/BAT/NSPS), cross-program elections.
- Strict compliance model with federal oversight and state implementation.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, shutdowns, liabilities. Drives risk management, operational efficiency, ESG alignment, market access. Builds stakeholder trust via transparency tools like ECHO, ICIS-NPDES.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, EMS design, controls deployment, training, audits. Applies to industrial sectors; high complexity due to site-specific permits, data governance. Ongoing via PDCA, regulatory tracking (Regulations.gov).
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF), Version 1.0 (May 2017), is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. Its primary purpose is to ensure cybersecurity resilience through governance, risk management, and controls, protecting information assets' confidentiality, integrity, and availability. It employs a principle-based, risk-oriented approach with a six-level maturity model, targeting at least Level 3.
Key Components
- Four main domains: Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Security.
- Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
- Built on NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; compliance via self-assessment and SAMA audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for banks, insurers, finance firms to avoid penalties, audits.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incidents, enables partnerships.
- Builds trust, efficiency, competitive edge in digital finance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment, monitoring.
- Applies to all SAMA entities; scalable by size.
- Requires self-assessments, evidence portfolios, continuous improvement.
Key Differences
| Aspect | EPA | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Environmental regulations across air/water/waste | Cybersecurity controls for financial institutions |
| Industry | All industrial sectors, US-wide | Saudi financial sector only |
| Nature | Mandatory federal environmental statutes | Mandatory cybersecurity framework |
| Testing | Monitoring, self-reporting, EPA inspections | Self-assessments, maturity model audits |
| Penalties | Civil/criminal fines, injunctive relief | Supervisory actions, potential fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about EPA and SAMA CSF
EPA FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EMAS vs APRA CPS 234
Compare EMAS vs APRA CPS 234: EU eco-management scheme meets Australia's info security standard. Unlock compliance strategies, key differences & implementation tips. Read now!
ISO 27018 vs ITIL
Explore ISO 27018 vs ITIL: Cloud PII privacy code augments ISO 27001, while ITIL 4 drives ITSM value via SVS & 34 practices. Key diffs, synergies for compliance. Dive in!
PDPA vs ISO 27701
Compare PDPA vs ISO 27701: Key differences in Singapore/Thailand PDPA rules vs ISO 27701 PIMS for privacy governance. Align strategies, cut risks—discover now!