Standards Comparison

    EU AI Act

    Mandatory
    2024

    EU regulation for risk-based AI system governance

    VS

    FedRAMP

    Mandatory
    2011

    U.S. government program standardizing cloud security authorization

    Quick Verdict

    EU AI Act regulates high-risk AI systems EU-wide with conformity assessments and fines up to 7% turnover, ensuring safety. FedRAMP authorizes secure cloud for US federal use via 3PAO assessments. Companies adopt AI Act for EU market access, FedRAMP for government contracts.

    Artificial Intelligence

    EU AI Act

    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Artificial Intelligence Act

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based four-tier AI classification framework
    • Outright bans on unacceptable-risk practices
    • Conformity assessment and CE marking required
    • Lifecycle risk management for high-risk systems
    • Systemic risk rules for general-purpose AI
    Cloud Security

    FedRAMP

    Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 control baselines with overlays
    • Three FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High)
    • Independent 3PAO security assessments required
    • Continuous monitoring with monthly deliverables
    • Assess once, use many times reusability

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    EU AI Act Details

    What It Is

    EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is a comprehensive, horizontal EU regulation for AI systems. It adopts a risk-based approach, prohibiting unacceptable risks, imposing strict controls on high-risk AI, transparency for limited-risk, and minimal rules for others. Scope covers providers, deployers across value chain, with extraterritorial reach.

    Key Components

    • Four risk tiers: unacceptable (banned), high-risk (Annex I/III), limited (transparency), minimal.
    • High-risk obligations: risk management (Art. 9), data governance (Art. 10), documentation (Arts. 11-13), human oversight (Art. 14), cybersecurity (Art. 15).
    • GPAI rules (Chapter V): documentation, systemic risk assessments.
    • Conformity assessment, CE marking, EU database registration; hybrid enforcement via AI Office, national authorities.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance avoids fines up to 7% global turnover.
    • Ensures EU market access for high-risk AI.
    • Builds trust, mitigates safety/fundamental rights risks.
    • Provides competitive edge in regulated sectors like healthcare, finance.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased (6-36 months): inventory/classify AI, build QMS/RMS, conduct assessments, monitor post-market. Applies to EU-impacting organizations; involves cross-functional teams, notified bodies for certification.

    FedRAMP Details

    What It Is

    FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on a risk-based approach using NIST SP 800-53 controls and FIPS 199 impact levels.

    Key Components

    • Baselines at Low (~156 controls), Moderate (~323), High (~410), plus LI-SaaS for low-risk SaaS.
    • Core artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring plans.
    • Built on NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5; involves 3PAOs for independent assessments.
    • Compliance model: Agency or Program authorizations, listed on FedRAMP Marketplace.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Unlocks federal contracts (e.g., $20M+ opportunities).
    • Required for agencies using cloud; enables CMMC compliance.
    • Enhances risk management, competitive edge, stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: preparation, 3PAO assessment, authorization, monitoring.
    • Applies to CSPs targeting U.S. federal market; high complexity for all sizes.
    • Requires audits by accredited 3PAOs; 12-18 months typical.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    EU AI Act
    AI systems by risk levels across lifecycle
    FedRAMP
    Cloud services security for federal agencies

    Industry

    EU AI Act
    All sectors, EU-wide, high-risk focus
    FedRAMP
    Cloud providers, US federal government only

    Nature

    EU AI Act
    Mandatory EU regulation with fines
    FedRAMP
    Standardized authorization program, required for contracts

    Testing

    EU AI Act
    Conformity assessments, notified bodies
    FedRAMP
    3PAO independent assessments, continuous monitoring

    Penalties

    EU AI Act
    Up to 7% global turnover fines
    FedRAMP
    Loss of authorization, contract ineligibility

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about EU AI Act and FedRAMP

    EU AI Act FAQ

    FedRAMP FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages